CAD · head to head
Modo vs Shapr3D
The short version
- Only Shapr3D has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Modo foundry announced on November 7, 2024 that it is winding down development of Modo after the Modo 17.1 release, with no further feature or maintenance releases anticipated; Shapr3D the free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- They diverge on capability: Modo covers Polygon modeling, Shapr3D covers Direct modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Modo and Shapr3D actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Modo
- Polygon modeling
- Subdivision surfaces
- Sculpting
- UV tools
- Procedural modeling
- Rendering
- Animation
- MeshFusion
Only in Shapr3D
- Direct modeling
- Parametric history
- Visualization
- 2D drawings
- Apple Pencil support
- Import/export
- Annotations
- Fusion 360
Both cover
- Windows support
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Modo
- Polygon and subdivision surface modelling for media and entertainment assetsnot Shapr3D
- Look development and rendering of product and character modelsnot Shapr3D
Shapr3D
- Direct modelling CAD on iPad with Apple Pencilnot Modo
- Producing manufacturable solid models and technical drawingsnot Modo
- Sharing CAD projects with collaborators on desktop and tabletnot Modo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Modo
- Foundry announced on November 7, 2024 that it is winding down development of Modo after the Modo 17.1 release, with no further feature or maintenance releases anticipated
- Support continues only until each customer's current contract term expires
- Foundry does not guarantee that Modo will keep working on future operating system updates because no patches will be issued, and recommends customers migrate to alternative 3D workflows
- Perpetual licences keep working but receive no further updates, bug fixes or support
- The Modo forums closed in December 2024 and downloads, docs and the support knowledgebase were committed only until November 2025
Shapr3D
- The free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- Free plan exports only basic resolution 3MF and STL, so no STEP or IGES output
- Free plan caps generative renders at 3 per day; Pro raises this to 50 per day and only Enterprise is unlimited
- Importing SLDPRT and SLDASM SolidWorks files requires Pro
- Importing NX, JT, CREO, Solid Edge and Rhino files requires Enterprise
- Exporting ACIS, FBX, Parasolid and PRC requires Enterprise
- On premises and single tenant data storage is Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is by quote with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Modo
$29/month- Indie$599/month
- Full Modo
- Revenue limit $100K
- Modo$1898/month
- Full commercial license
Shapr3D
Free- BasicFree
- 2 projects
- cloud storage
- basic import/export (XT, STEP, IGES, DWG, STL)
- Pro$299/year
- unlimited shared team projects
- up to 2 contributors
- high-resolution exports
- Enterprise$null/custom
- granular access control
- flexible data storage (single tenant/private cloud/on-premises)
- unlimited renders
Which should you pick?
Choose Modo if
- You need polygon modeling.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want subdivision surfaces.
Choose Shapr3D if
- You need direct modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- You also want parametric history.
Questions people ask
- Is Modo or Shapr3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. Modo starts at $29/month and Shapr3D at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Modo or Shapr3D?
- Shapr3D has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for Modo and Free for Shapr3D.
- Does Modo or Shapr3D run on more platforms?
- Modo runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Shapr3D runs on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- Can I use Shapr3D for free?
- Yes. Shapr3D has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Modo starts at $29/month.
- What is Modo best used for?
- Modo is most often used for polygon and subdivision surface modelling for media and entertainment assets, look development and rendering of product and character models. Of those, polygon and subdivision surface modelling for media and entertainment assets and look development and rendering of product and character models are not what Shapr3D is typically brought in for.
- What can Modo do that Shapr3D cannot?
- Modo covers Polygon modeling, Subdivision surfaces, Sculpting, UV tools. Shapr3D covers Direct modeling, Parametric history, Visualization, 2D drawings. Both handle Windows support, MacOS support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Shapr3D: How much does Shapr3D cost?
Shapr3D Basic tier is free. Pro tier is $299 per year or available monthly with price not specified on the pricing page. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales.
SourceShapr3D: Is there a free trial for Shapr3D Pro?
Yes, Shapr3D offers a 14-day free trial for Pro tier that requires a credit card, plus a 14-day money-back guarantee on purchases.
SourceShapr3D: What is the difference between Shapr3D Pro and Enterprise?
Pro tier includes up to 2 contributors on unlimited shared team projects, 50 renders daily, technical drawings, and AR on iPad. Enterprise provides granular access control, flexible data storage options (single tenant, private cloud, on-premises, or cloud off), unlimited renders, extended import/export formats, and dedicated account management.
SourceShapr3D: Does Shapr3D offer educational pricing?
Yes, Shapr3D is free for students and educators with annual license renewal through an in-app application form.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Modo vs V-Ray
- Modo vs KeyShot
- Modo vs Enscape
- Modo vs FreeCAD
- Modo vs Arnold
- Modo vs Redshift
- Modo vs Octane Render
- Modo vs PrusaSlicer
- Modo vs Ultimaker Cura
- Modo vs Siemens NX
- Modo vs Lumion
- Modo vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Modo vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Modo vs Nomad Sculpt
- Modo vs nTop
- Modo vs RealityScan
- Modo vs Corona Renderer
- Modo vs IronCAD
- Modo vs Creo
- Modo vs Houdini
- Modo vs Inventor
- Modo vs Plasticity
- Modo vs 3D-Coat
- Modo vs Alibre Design
- Modo vs Substance 3D Designer
- Modo vs Vectorworks
- Modo vs Zoo
- Modo vs Twinmotion
- Modo vs Tinkercad
- Shapr3D vs V-Ray
- Shapr3D vs KeyShot
- Shapr3D vs Enscape
- Shapr3D vs FreeCAD
- Shapr3D vs Arnold
- Shapr3D vs Redshift
- Shapr3D vs Octane Render
- Shapr3D vs PrusaSlicer
- Shapr3D vs Ultimaker Cura
- Shapr3D vs Siemens NX
- Shapr3D vs Lumion
- Shapr3D vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Shapr3D vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Shapr3D vs Nomad Sculpt
- Shapr3D vs nTop
- Shapr3D vs RealityScan
- Shapr3D vs Corona Renderer
- Shapr3D vs IronCAD
- Shapr3D vs Creo
- Shapr3D vs Houdini
- Shapr3D vs Inventor
- Shapr3D vs Plasticity
- Shapr3D vs 3D-Coat
- Shapr3D vs Alibre Design
- Shapr3D vs Substance 3D Designer
- Shapr3D vs Vectorworks
- Shapr3D vs Zoo
- Shapr3D vs Twinmotion
- Shapr3D vs Tinkercad


