CAD · head to head
nTop vs Shapr3D

nTop
CAD
Implicit computational design for lattices, heat exchangers and topology-driven parts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Shapr3D has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: nTop nTop is a specialist tool that sits alongside mainstream CAD rather than replacing it, so you pay for an extra seat and accept a handoff between two geometry systems.; Shapr3D the free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- They diverge on capability: nTop covers Implicit modelling, Shapr3D covers Direct modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which nTop and Shapr3D actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in nTop
- Implicit modelling
- Lattice and cellular structures
- Field-driven design
- Integrated simulation
- Reusable workflows
- Topology optimisation
- CAD and AM interoperability
Only in Shapr3D
- Direct modeling
- Parametric history
- Visualization
- 2D drawings
- Apple Pencil support
- Import/export
- Annotations
- Fusion 360
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
nTop
- Designing a variable-density lattice bracket where mass must drop without losing stiffness in the loaded regionsnot Shapr3D
- Generating a heat exchanger with thousands of internal channels that a conventional CAD kernel cannot representnot Shapr3D
- Producing patient-specific implant geometry with porous surfaces at scale rather than one at a timenot Shapr3D
- Automating a family of parts as a reusable design workflow that reruns when the load case changesnot Shapr3D
Shapr3D
- Direct modelling CAD on iPad with Apple Pencilnot nTop
- Producing manufacturable solid models and technical drawingsnot nTop
- Sharing CAD projects with collaborators on desktop and tabletnot nTop
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
nTop
- nTop is a specialist tool that sits alongside mainstream CAD rather than replacing it, so you pay for an extra seat and accept a handoff between two geometry systems.
- Implicit modelling requires a different way of thinking from feature-based CAD, and the retraining period is long enough that unused licences are a common and expensive outcome.
- No pricing is published and there is no free or hobbyist tier, so evaluation runs through a sales process and small teams cannot try it seriously without engaging.
- Subscription only, with no perpetual licence, means the geometry logic you built stops being editable the day you stop paying, which is a real risk for long-lifecycle aerospace and medical programmes.
- The output is most valuable when you have additive manufacturing capacity to make it; organisations without machines that can print the geometry end up designing parts nobody can produce.
Shapr3D
- The free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- Free plan exports only basic resolution 3MF and STL, so no STEP or IGES output
- Free plan caps generative renders at 3 per day; Pro raises this to 50 per day and only Enterprise is unlimited
- Importing SLDPRT and SLDASM SolidWorks files requires Pro
- Importing NX, JT, CREO, Solid Edge and Rhino files requires Enterprise
- Exporting ACIS, FBX, Parasolid and PRC requires Enterprise
- On premises and single tenant data storage is Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is by quote with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
nTop
On request- nTop$undefined/year
- Annual named or floating seat subscription
- No perpetual licence offered
- Capability tiers quoted by use case
Shapr3D
Free- BasicFree
- 2 projects
- cloud storage
- basic import/export (XT, STEP, IGES, DWG, STL)
- Pro$299/year
- unlimited shared team projects
- up to 2 contributors
- high-resolution exports
- Enterprise$null/custom
- granular access control
- flexible data storage (single tenant/private cloud/on-premises)
- unlimited renders
Which should you pick?
Choose nTop if
- You need implicit modelling.
- You work on Windows, Cloud.
- You also want lattice and cellular structures.
Choose Shapr3D if
- You need direct modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- You also want parametric history.
Questions people ask
- Is nTop or Shapr3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. nTop starts at On request and Shapr3D at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, nTop or Shapr3D?
- Shapr3D has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for nTop and Free for Shapr3D.
- Does nTop or Shapr3D run on more platforms?
- nTop runs on Windows, Cloud. Shapr3D runs on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- Can I use Shapr3D for free?
- Yes. Shapr3D has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. nTop starts at On request.
- What is nTop best used for?
- nTop is most often used for designing a variable-density lattice bracket where mass must drop without losing stiffness in the loaded regions, generating a heat exchanger with thousands of internal channels that a conventional cad kernel cannot represent, producing patient-specific implant geometry with porous surfaces at scale rather than one at a time, automating a family of parts as a reusable design workflow that reruns when the load case changes. Of those, designing a variable-density lattice bracket where mass must drop without losing stiffness in the loaded regions and generating a heat exchanger with thousands of internal channels that a conventional cad kernel cannot represent are not what Shapr3D is typically brought in for.
- What can nTop do that Shapr3D cannot?
- nTop covers Implicit modelling, Lattice and cellular structures, Field-driven design, Integrated simulation. Shapr3D covers Direct modeling, Parametric history, Visualization, 2D drawings.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
nTop: Is nTop the same company as nTopology?
Yes. nTopology rebranded to nTop. The product is the same lineage.
Shapr3D: How much does Shapr3D cost?
Shapr3D Basic tier is free. Pro tier is $299 per year or available monthly with price not specified on the pricing page. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales.
SourcenTop: Does it replace SolidWorks or NX?
No. It is used alongside them. Mainstream CAD handles the conventional geometry and assembly; nTop handles the lattice, field-driven and complex internal structure work.
Shapr3D: Is there a free trial for Shapr3D Pro?
Yes, Shapr3D offers a 14-day free trial for Pro tier that requires a credit card, plus a 14-day money-back guarantee on purchases.
SourcenTop: Is there a free version?
No free commercial tier is published. Access runs through a demo and sales process, with academic programmes handled separately.
Shapr3D: What is the difference between Shapr3D Pro and Enterprise?
Pro tier includes up to 2 contributors on unlimited shared team projects, 50 renders daily, technical drawings, and AR on iPad. Enterprise provides granular access control, flexible data storage options (single tenant, private cloud, on-premises, or cloud off), unlimited renders, extended import/export formats, and dedicated account management.
SourcenTop: Can I buy a perpetual licence?
No. It is sold as an annual subscription, so budget it as recurring cost across the life of the programme.
Shapr3D: Does Shapr3D offer educational pricing?
Yes, Shapr3D is free for students and educators with annual license renewal through an in-app application form.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- nTop vs ANSYS Fluent
- nTop vs Siemens NX
- nTop vs CoreTechnologie
- nTop vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- nTop vs Bambu Studio
- nTop vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- nTop vs SolveSpace
- nTop vs Zoo
- nTop vs OnShape
- nTop vs Arnold
- nTop vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- nTop vs Alibre Design
- nTop vs DraftSight
- nTop vs Mari
- nTop vs IronCAD
- nTop vs KiCad
- nTop vs Redshift
- nTop vs Modo
- nTop vs FreeCAD
- nTop vs V-Ray
- nTop vs Enscape
- nTop vs KeyShot
- nTop vs Creo
- nTop vs Houdini
- nTop vs Inventor
- nTop vs Plasticity
- nTop vs 3D-Coat
- nTop vs Substance 3D Designer
- nTop vs Vectorworks
- nTop vs Twinmotion
- nTop vs Tinkercad
- Shapr3D vs ANSYS Fluent
- Shapr3D vs Siemens NX
- Shapr3D vs CoreTechnologie
- Shapr3D vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Shapr3D vs Bambu Studio
- Shapr3D vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Shapr3D vs SolveSpace
- Shapr3D vs Zoo
- Shapr3D vs OnShape
- Shapr3D vs Arnold
- Shapr3D vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Shapr3D vs Alibre Design
- Shapr3D vs DraftSight
- Shapr3D vs Mari
- Shapr3D vs IronCAD
- Shapr3D vs KiCad
- Shapr3D vs Redshift
- Shapr3D vs Modo
- Shapr3D vs FreeCAD
- Shapr3D vs V-Ray
- Shapr3D vs Enscape
- Shapr3D vs KeyShot
- Shapr3D vs Creo
- Shapr3D vs Houdini
- Shapr3D vs Inventor
- Shapr3D vs Plasticity
- Shapr3D vs 3D-Coat
- Shapr3D vs Substance 3D Designer
- Shapr3D vs Vectorworks
- Shapr3D vs Twinmotion
- Shapr3D vs Tinkercad

