Construction · head to head
Cubit Estimating vs Foundation Software

Cubit Estimating
Construction
Australian estimating and on-screen takeoff in one window, priced openly per user per month
- From
- 167/month
- Rated
- -

Foundation Software
Construction
Job cost accounting and construction payroll for contractors running certified and union jobs
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cubit Estimating every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.; Foundation Software no pricing is published anywhere, so shortlisting requires sitting through a sales process before you know whether the product is within budget at all.
- They diverge on capability: Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Foundation Software covers Job costing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cubit Estimating and Foundation Software actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cubit Estimating | Foundation Software |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | 167/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cubit Estimating
- Integrated takeoff and estimate
- Calculation and rate sheets
- Price list management
- Bills of quantities
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Revision management
- AI Estimating add-on
- Job collaboration
Only in Foundation Software
- Job costing
- Certified payroll
- Union payroll
- AIA billing
- Equipment costing
- Service dispatch
- Mobile time entry
- Executive dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cubit Estimating
- An Australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement toolnot Foundation Software
- A quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local conventionnot Foundation Software
- A subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tendernot Foundation Software
- A small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is publishednot Foundation Software
Foundation Software
- A union electrical or mechanical contractor whose payroll spans several trades and fringe schedules in the same weeknot Cubit Estimating
- A general contractor bidding federally funded work that requires weekly certified payroll filingsnot Cubit Estimating
- A contractor whose QuickBooks file has outgrown job costing and who is reconciling work in progress in spreadsheetsnot Cubit Estimating
- A firm with owned plant that needs equipment hours costed back to jobs to see true contract marginnot Cubit Estimating
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cubit Estimating
- Every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.
- BIM and IFC takeoff sits only in Enterprise at $250 per user per month, meaning a builder who receives models rather than PDFs is pushed to the top tier whether or not it needs collaboration features.
- The product is Windows only with no macOS or browser client, which excludes practices standardised on Macs unless they run virtualisation.
- Rate libraries, measurement conventions and BOQ structures follow Australian practice, so buyers outside Australia and New Zealand inherit a method that does not match their local standard forms.
- The AI Estimating add-on is priced at an explicitly temporary introductory rate, so a firm building the feature into its workflow is accepting an unspecified future increase on top of the seat price.
Foundation Software
- No pricing is published anywhere, so shortlisting requires sitting through a sales process before you know whether the product is within budget at all.
- Implementation, data conversion and training are billed separately from the licence and routinely run into five figures, which buyers comparing monthly software subscriptions do not budget for.
- The payroll compliance engine is built for United States federal and state law, so the product has essentially no value to contractors outside the US.
- The interface is a long-lived Windows-style application, and staff hired from cloud-native tools find it slow to learn compared with Buildertrend or Procore.
- Project management, document control and field collaboration are weaker than the dedicated construction platforms, so most sites end up running Foundation for money and something else for the job, and paying twice.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cubit Estimating
167/month- Standard$167/month
- Integrated estimating and takeoff
- Calculation sheets, rate sheets and price lists
- Basic job management
- Professional$222/month
- Everything in Standard
- Code grouping
- Custom reporting
- Enterprise$250/month
- Everything in Professional
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Multi-user job collaboration
- AI Estimating add-on$20/month
- Automated element recognition
- Works with any edition
- Introductory rate the vendor says will increase
Foundation Software
On request- FOUNDATION$undefined/year
- Modular licensing, priced by modules and user count
- Cloud hosted or installed on your own server
- Separate one-off implementation, data conversion and training fee
Which should you pick?
Choose Cubit Estimating if
- You need integrated takeoff and estimate.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want calculation and rate sheets.
Choose Foundation Software if
- You need job costing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want certified payroll.
Questions people ask
- Is Cubit Estimating or Foundation Software better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and Foundation Software at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cubit Estimating or Foundation Software?
- Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and Foundation Software at On request.
- Does Cubit Estimating or Foundation Software run on more platforms?
- Cubit Estimating runs on Windows. Foundation Software runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Cubit Estimating best used for?
- Cubit Estimating is most often used for an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool, a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention, a subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tender, a small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is published. Of those, an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool and a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention are not what Foundation Software is typically brought in for.
- What can Cubit Estimating do that Foundation Software cannot?
- Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Calculation and rate sheets, Price list management, Bills of quantities. Foundation Software covers Job costing, Certified payroll, Union payroll, AIA billing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cubit Estimating: What does Cubit actually cost?
Standard $167, Professional $222 and Enterprise $250 per user per month on annual billing, in Australian dollars excluding GST. Monthly billing is about 16 per cent more.
Foundation Software: How much does Foundation Software cost?
The vendor publishes no rates. Pricing is assembled per contractor from module selection and user count, with a separate implementation fee, and is only given after a discovery call.
Cubit Estimating: Can I get BIM takeoff without the Enterprise tier?
No. IFC model takeoff is an Enterprise feature only.
Foundation Software: Does it replace Procore?
No. Foundation is the accounting and payroll system; Procore is project management. They integrate, and many contractors run both.
Cubit Estimating: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Cubit Estimating is subscription only with a minimum twelve month commitment.
Foundation Software: Can it handle certified payroll for multiple states?
Yes, it produces state-specific certified payroll formats as well as the federal WH-347, which is the main reason multi-state contractors buy it.
Cubit Estimating: Does it suit contractors outside Australia?
It works, but rate libraries and BOQ conventions follow Australian standards, so buyers elsewhere do more setup than a locally built alternative would need.
Foundation Software: Is there a cloud version?
Yes, it is offered hosted as well as on-premise, but the hosted version is the same application delivered remotely rather than a rebuilt browser product.
Related pages
More on Cubit Estimating
More on Foundation Software
Other head to heads
- Cubit Estimating vs Togal.AI
- Cubit Estimating vs PlanSwift
- Cubit Estimating vs Sage Estimating
- Cubit Estimating vs Bluebeam Revu
- Cubit Estimating vs RIB CostX
- Cubit Estimating vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Cubit Estimating vs Handoff
- Cubit Estimating vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs B2W Estimate
- Cubit Estimating vs Dalux
- Cubit Estimating vs Bridgit Bravo
- Cubit Estimating vs Builderbox
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildots
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildxact
- Cubit Estimating vs Chief Architect
- Cubit Estimating vs Clearstory
- Cubit Estimating vs Adaptive
- Cubit Estimating vs Siteline
- Cubit Estimating vs Kojo
- Cubit Estimating vs Sage 300 Construction
- Cubit Estimating vs GCPay
- Cubit Estimating vs Procore
- Cubit Estimating vs Briq
- Cubit Estimating vs CMiC
- Cubit Estimating vs Jonas Premier
- Cubit Estimating vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Cubit Estimating vs Topcon MAGNET
- Cubit Estimating vs Trunk Tools
- Cubit Estimating vs Microsoft Project
- Cubit Estimating vs Egnyte
- Cubit Estimating vs Fieldwire
- Cubit Estimating vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Foundation Software vs Togal.AI
- Foundation Software vs PlanSwift
- Foundation Software vs Sage Estimating
- Foundation Software vs Bluebeam Revu
- Foundation Software vs RIB CostX
- Foundation Software vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Foundation Software vs HCSS
- Foundation Software vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Foundation Software vs Handoff
- Foundation Software vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Foundation Software vs B2W Estimate
- Foundation Software vs Dalux
- Foundation Software vs Bridgit Bravo
- Foundation Software vs Builderbox
- Foundation Software vs Buildots
- Foundation Software vs Buildxact
- Foundation Software vs Chief Architect
- Foundation Software vs Clearstory
- Foundation Software vs Adaptive
- Foundation Software vs Siteline
- Foundation Software vs Kojo
- Foundation Software vs Sage 300 Construction
- Foundation Software vs GCPay
- Foundation Software vs Procore
- Foundation Software vs Briq
- Foundation Software vs CMiC
- Foundation Software vs Jonas Premier
- Foundation Software vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Foundation Software vs Topcon MAGNET
- Foundation Software vs Trunk Tools
- Foundation Software vs Microsoft Project
- Foundation Software vs Egnyte
- Foundation Software vs Fieldwire
- Foundation Software vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
