Cloud · head to head
Fly.io vs Infracost

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Infracost has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fly.io egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are; Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- They diverge on capability: Fly.io covers Global deployment, Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fly.io and Infracost actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fly.io
- Global deployment
- Docker support
- Postgres databases
- Redis support
- Auto-scaling
- Health checks
- Backups
- Monitoring
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fly.io
- Deploying containerised applications close to users across regionsnot Infracost
- Running full stack apps and databases on managed machinesnot Infracost
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Fly.io
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Fly.io
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Fly.io
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Fly.io
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fly.io
- Egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are
- Stopped machines still bill at $0.15 per GB of root filesystem a month, so a paused service is not a free one
- Volumes are billed on provisioned capacity rather than usage, at $0.15 per GB a month
- Reservation discounts of 40% require paying a year up front, from $36 to $1,440
- Fly Kubernetes is a separate $75 a month per cluster
- Dedicated IPv4 addresses are $2 a month each
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fly.io
$29/month- Pay-as-You-Go$null/mo
- Micro VMs and persistent storage charged by usage
- FlyCTL CLI
- Unlimited users and organizations
- Serious Support$29/month
- Access to dedicated engineering team
- All Pay-as-You-Go features
- Machine Reservation Blocks$null/mo
- 40% discount on machine usage
- Requires upfront payment for savings
- Compliance Package$99/month
- HIPAA compliance
- BAAs
- SOC2 documentation
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Which should you pick?
Choose Fly.io if
- You need global deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Docker.
- You also want docker support.
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Fly.io or Infracost better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fly.io starts at $29/month and Infracost at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fly.io or Infracost?
- Infracost has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for Fly.io and Free for Infracost.
- Does Fly.io or Infracost run on more platforms?
- Fly.io runs on Web, Api, Docker. Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Infracost for free?
- Yes. Infracost has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fly.io starts at $29/month.
- What is Fly.io best used for?
- Fly.io is most often used for deploying containerised applications close to users across regions, running full stack apps and databases on managed machines. Of those, deploying containerised applications close to users across regions and running full stack apps and databases on managed machines are not what Infracost is typically brought in for.
- What can Fly.io do that Infracost cannot?
- Fly.io covers Global deployment, Docker support, Postgres databases, Redis support. Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fly.io: Is there a free tier for Fly.io?
Fly.io does not advertise a free tier. The base plan is pay-as-you-go with usage-based pricing for Micro VMs and persistent storage. All users get FlyCTL CLI, unlimited organizations, private networking, SSO, ACLs, and scoped tokens.
SourceInfracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Fly.io: How much does Fly.io Serious Support cost?
Serious Support costs 29 USD per month and provides access to a dedicated engineering team while maintaining all pay-as-you-go features for Micro VMs and storage.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Fly.io: What does Fly.io Compliance Package include?
The Compliance Package is 99 USD per month and includes HIPAA compliance, BAAs, and SOC2 documentation for organizations requiring compliance certifications.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Fly.io: Does Fly.io offer discounts for upfront commitment?
Yes, Fly.io offers Machine Reservation Blocks with 40% discount on machine usage. This requires upfront payment but applies savings on infrastructure costs.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fly.io vs Dokku
- Fly.io vs Porter
- Fly.io vs DigitalOcean
- Fly.io vs Neon
- Fly.io vs Koyeb
- Fly.io vs Zeabur
- Fly.io vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fly.io vs Grafana Cloud
- Fly.io vs Coolify
- Fly.io vs Render
- Fly.io vs Railway
- Fly.io vs Beam Cloud
- Fly.io vs CapRover
- Fly.io vs Chef
- Fly.io vs Cilium
- Fly.io vs Contabo
- Fly.io vs containerd
- Fly.io vs Terragrunt
- Fly.io vs Pulumi
- Fly.io vs Packer
- Fly.io vs Serverless Framework
- Fly.io vs SST
- Fly.io vs DeepInfra
- Fly.io vs Linode
- Fly.io vs VictoriaMetrics
- Fly.io vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs Dokku
- Infracost vs Porter
- Infracost vs DigitalOcean
- Infracost vs Neon
- Infracost vs Koyeb
- Infracost vs Zeabur
- Infracost vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Infracost vs Grafana Cloud
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs Render
- Infracost vs Railway
- Infracost vs Beam Cloud
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs containerd
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Vagrant

