Software · head to head
DigitalOcean vs Fly.io
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DigitalOcean data transfer overage charged at $0.01 per GiB beyond included allowances; Fly.io egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are
- They diverge on capability: DigitalOcean covers Droplets (VPS), Fly.io covers Global deployment.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DigitalOcean and Fly.io actually diverge.
| Attribute | DigitalOcean | Fly.io |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Linux, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure backend) | Web, Api, Docker |
| Founded | 2011 | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DigitalOcean
- Droplets (VPS)
- Managed Kubernetes
- App Platform
- Managed Databases
- Spaces (Object Storage)
- Floating IPs
- Load Balancers
- Firewalls
Only in Fly.io
- Global deployment
- Docker support
- Postgres databases
- Redis support
- Auto-scaling
- Health checks
- Backups
- Monitoring
Both cover
- Docker
- Git
- GitHub
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DigitalOcean
- Developers seeking affordable VPS starting at $4/month for small applicationsnot Fly.io
- Teams deploying containerised workloads with Kubernetes starting at $12/month cluster costnot Fly.io
- Data scientists and ML engineers requiring NVIDIA GPU access at $1.91/GPU/hour (committed)not Fly.io
Fly.io
- Deploying containerised applications close to users across regionsnot DigitalOcean
- Running full stack apps and databases on managed machinesnot DigitalOcean
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DigitalOcean
- Data transfer overage charged at $0.01 per GiB beyond included allowances
- Free tier includes only 3 static sites; additional static sites require paid upgrade
- Container registry free tier capped at 500 MiB storage; exceeding requires paid tier
- Functions free tier allows 90,000 GiB-seconds monthly; overages billed on usage basis
- GPU Droplets require minimum monthly commitment for lower hourly rates; on-demand significantly more expensive
Fly.io
- Egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are
- Stopped machines still bill at $0.15 per GB of root filesystem a month, so a paused service is not a free one
- Volumes are billed on provisioned capacity rather than usage, at $0.15 per GB a month
- Reservation discounts of 40% require paying a year up front, from $36 to $1,440
- Fly Kubernetes is a separate $75 a month per cluster
- Dedicated IPv4 addresses are $2 a month each
Pricing, plan by plan
DigitalOcean
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the DigitalOcean review.
Fly.io
Free- FreeFree
- 3 shared-cpu-1x VMs
- 3GB persistence storage
- 160GB outbound data/month
- Pay-as-you-goFree
- Unlimited applications
- Dedicated machines
- Global deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose DigitalOcean if
- You need droplets (vps).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure backend).
- You also want managed kubernetes.
Choose Fly.io if
- You need global deployment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Docker.
- You also want docker support.
Questions people ask
- Is DigitalOcean or Fly.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. DigitalOcean starts at Free and Fly.io at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DigitalOcean or Fly.io?
- DigitalOcean starts at Free and Fly.io at Free.
- Does DigitalOcean or Fly.io run on more platforms?
- DigitalOcean runs on Linux, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure backend). Fly.io runs on Web, Api, Docker.
- Can I use DigitalOcean for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DigitalOcean best used for?
- DigitalOcean is most often used for developers seeking affordable vps starting at $4/month for small applications, teams deploying containerised workloads with kubernetes starting at $12/month cluster cost, data scientists and ml engineers requiring nvidia gpu access at $1.91/gpu/hour (committed). Of those, developers seeking affordable vps starting at $4/month for small applications and teams deploying containerised workloads with kubernetes starting at $12/month cluster cost are not what Fly.io is typically brought in for.
- What can DigitalOcean do that Fly.io cannot?
- DigitalOcean covers Droplets (VPS), Managed Kubernetes, App Platform, Managed Databases. Fly.io covers Global deployment, Docker support, Postgres databases, Redis support. Both handle Docker, Git, GitHub, Cloud deployment.
Related pages
More on DigitalOcean
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- DigitalOcean vs Grafana Cloud
- DigitalOcean vs Neon
- DigitalOcean vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- DigitalOcean vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- DigitalOcean vs Deno Deploy
- DigitalOcean vs Heroku
- DigitalOcean vs Hetzner Cloud
- DigitalOcean vs Linode
- DigitalOcean vs Packer
- DigitalOcean vs Pulumi
- DigitalOcean vs Render
- DigitalOcean vs Upstash
- DigitalOcean vs Vagrant
- DigitalOcean vs Vultr
- DigitalOcean vs Akamai
- DigitalOcean vs Alibaba Cloud
- DigitalOcean vs Chef
- DigitalOcean vs Contabo
- Fly.io vs Grafana Cloud
- Fly.io vs Neon
- Fly.io vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fly.io vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Fly.io vs Deno Deploy
- Fly.io vs Heroku
- Fly.io vs Hetzner Cloud
- Fly.io vs Linode
- Fly.io vs Packer
- Fly.io vs Pulumi
- Fly.io vs Render
- Fly.io vs Upstash
- Fly.io vs Vagrant
- Fly.io vs Vultr
- Fly.io vs Akamai
- Fly.io vs Alibaba Cloud
- Fly.io vs Chef
- Fly.io vs Contabo


