Softwr
Infracost logo

Infracost

Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier

As of 31 August 2026, Infracost has a free plan and paid plans start at $250/month. An Apache-2. Softwr lists it under Cloud. Infracost is made by Infracost Inc., available on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows.

Overview

What Infracost does

Infracost parses Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation, AWS CDK, ARM and Bicep definitions and produces a cost estimate for the resources they would create, so a pull request that adds an expensive instance type says so before anyone approves it. The command line tool is Apache 2.0 and has never been relicensed, which is a cleaner position than most of the infrastructure tooling around it. The division between free and paid is the thing to understand. The open source tool estimates and flags. It parses definitions, produces breakdowns and diffs, and reports policy and tagging violations locally. Everything that turns that into a control sits in the hosted product: pull request comments, automated remediation, organisation-wide policies, cost guardrails, dashboards and audit trails. The permissive licence protects a real tool, and an increasing share of the product is on the other side of it. The estimates are also list price rather than your bill. Negotiated enterprise agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level price overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier, and the documentation is explicit that usage-based resources such as object storage, functions and data transfer need monthly usage figures supplied by hand or they read as free.

What people use it for

  • Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice
  • Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all
  • Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platform
  • Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraform

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Infracost.

  • Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
  • Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
  • The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
  • Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
  • The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of Infracost

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • Infracost logo
    Infracost
    vs
    Spacelift logo
    Spacelift

    Spacelift: Orchestration rather than costing, where cost policy is one gate among many

  • Infracost logo
    Infracost
    vs
    Steampipe logo
    Steampipe

    Steampipe: Query cloud spend and configuration with SQL instead of estimating from code

Pricing

What Infracost costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Free

Free

  • 1,000 runs a month
  • Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
  • Community support

Starter

$250 /mo

  • 10,000 runs a month
  • Email support

Cloud

$1,000 /mo

  • Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
  • FinOps policies and cost guardrails
  • Dashboards and audit trails
  • Automated remediation

Enterprise

On request

  • SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
  • Business unit reporting
  • SSO with SAML group mapping
  • Service level agreements

Capabilities

Features

  • Pull request cost diffs

    Comments on the change showing what the infrastructure delta costs per month

  • Multi-format parsing

    Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation, AWS CDK, ARM, Bicep and Kubernetes

  • Apache-2.0 CLI

    The estimation engine is open source with no relicensing history

  • FinOps policies

    Organisation-wide rules on tagging and spend, in the hosted product

  • Automated remediation

    Pull requests that fix policy violations, in the hosted product

  • IDE integration

    Inline estimates in VS Code and JetBrains editors

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?

Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.

Will the estimate match my cloud bill?

No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.

Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?

Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.

Has the licence ever changed?

No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.

What is a run?

Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from Infracost

Best Cloud software for

Compare Infracost with

Other Cloud software

  • The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust

    Free plan8 researched notes
  • Modern infrastructure as code using programming languages

    Free plan15 researched notes
  • Build automated machine images

    Free plan9 researched notes
  • Build and deploy serverless applications on AWS Lambda

    Free, then $4/credit9 researched notes
  • Build full-stack apps on your own infrastructure

    Free plan8 researched notes
  • Open source self-hosted platform that deploys applications and databases to servers you already own

    Free, then $5/mo12 researched notes
  • Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Low-cost cloud API for running open-source AI models

    From $0.08/mo11 researched notes
  • Affordable cloud hosting and infrastructure

    Free, then $5/mo11 researched notes
  • Fast, cost-effective time series database for metrics

    Open source9 researched notes
  • Affordable high-performance VPS hosting

    From €4.5/mo11 researched notes
  • Infrastructure automation and management

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes

    Open source7 researched notes
  • Development environments made easy

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • Open source self-hosted platform that deploys applications and databases to servers you already own

    Free, then $5/mo12 researched notes
  • Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Affordable high-performance VPS hosting

    From €4.5/mo11 researched notes
  • Industry-standard container runtime, and the engine inside Docker

    Open source10 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Infracost, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on Infracost

Best Cloud software alternatives

Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour

Per node hour

Kubernetes operator that deploys and manages Ceph storage clusters

Open source, no licence fee

Open source container-attached storage for Kubernetes

Open source, no licence fee

Open source distributed block storage for Kubernetes, incubating at the CNCF

Open source, no licence fee

Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account

quote

Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates

Open source, no licence fee

Open source self-hosted platform that deploys applications and databases to servers you already own

Open source, no licence fee

Compare Infracost with alternatives