Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Fly.io vs Linode

Linode
Cloud & Infrastructure
Affordable cloud hosting and infrastructure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fly.io egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are; Linode linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- They diverge on capability: Fly.io covers Global deployment, Linode covers Compute instances.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fly.io and Linode actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud & Infrastructure).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fly.io
- Global deployment
- Docker support
- Postgres databases
- Redis support
- Auto-scaling
- Health checks
- Backups
- Monitoring
Only in Linode
- Compute instances
- Object storage
- Block storage
- Kubernetes
- Managed database
- Load balancers
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Both cover
- Docker
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fly.io
- Deploying containerised applications close to users across regionsnot Linode
- Running full stack apps and databases on managed machinesnot Linode
Linode
- Running Linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated CPU plansnot Fly.io
- Managed Kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud accountnot Fly.io
- Hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regionsnot Fly.io
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fly.io
- Egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are
- Stopped machines still bill at $0.15 per GB of root filesystem a month, so a paused service is not a free one
- Volumes are billed on provisioned capacity rather than usage, at $0.15 per GB a month
- Reservation discounts of 40% require paying a year up front, from $36 to $1,440
- Fly Kubernetes is a separate $75 a month per cluster
- Dedicated IPv4 addresses are $2 a month each
Linode
- linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- Charges accrue for any service on the account even when it is powered off, because RAM and network capacity stay reserved; only deleting the service stops billing
- Network transfer beyond the monthly allotment is billed from $0.005 per GB and the rate varies by region
- The Akamai Cloud pricing landing page shows no rates and directs visitors to regional pricing pages or sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Fly.io
Free- FreeFree
- 3 shared-cpu-1x VMs
- 3GB persistence storage
- 160GB outbound data/month
- Pay-as-you-goFree
- Unlimited applications
- Dedicated machines
- Global deployment
Linode
Free- Nanode 1GB$5/month
- 1GB RAM
- 1 vCPU
- 25GB SSD
- Linode 4GB$20/month
- 4GB RAM
- 2 vCPU
- 80GB SSD
Which should you pick?
Choose Fly.io if
- You need global deployment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Docker.
- You also want docker support.
Choose Linode if
- You need compute instances.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want object storage.
Questions people ask
- Is Fly.io or Linode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fly.io starts at Free and Linode at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fly.io or Linode?
- Fly.io starts at Free and Linode at Free.
- Does Fly.io or Linode run on more platforms?
- Fly.io runs on Web, Api, Docker. Linode runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use Fly.io for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Fly.io best used for?
- Fly.io is most often used for deploying containerised applications close to users across regions, running full stack apps and databases on managed machines. Of those, deploying containerised applications close to users across regions and running full stack apps and databases on managed machines are not what Linode is typically brought in for.
- What can Fly.io do that Linode cannot?
- Fly.io covers Global deployment, Docker support, Postgres databases, Redis support. Linode covers Compute instances, Object storage, Block storage, Kubernetes. Both handle Docker, Cloud deployment, Web support, Api support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fly.io vs Grafana Cloud
- Fly.io vs Neon
- Fly.io vs DigitalOcean
- Fly.io vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fly.io vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Fly.io vs Deno Deploy
- Fly.io vs Heroku
- Fly.io vs Hetzner Cloud
- Fly.io vs Packer
- Fly.io vs Pulumi
- Fly.io vs Render
- Fly.io vs Upstash
- Fly.io vs Vagrant
- Fly.io vs Vultr
- Fly.io vs Akamai
- Fly.io vs Alibaba Cloud
- Fly.io vs Chef
- Fly.io vs Contabo
- Linode vs Grafana Cloud
- Linode vs Neon
- Linode vs DigitalOcean
- Linode vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Linode vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Linode vs Deno Deploy
- Linode vs Heroku
- Linode vs Hetzner Cloud
- Linode vs Packer
- Linode vs Pulumi
- Linode vs Render
- Linode vs Upstash
- Linode vs Vagrant
- Linode vs Vultr
- Linode vs Akamai
- Linode vs Alibaba Cloud
- Linode vs Chef
- Linode vs Contabo

