Cloud · head to head
Infracost vs Koyeb

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Koyeb
Cloud
High-performance serverless infrastructure for APIs, inference, and databases
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Infracost has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.; Koyeb pricing starts at $29/month with additional compute costs
- They diverge on capability: Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Koyeb covers Serverless containers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infracost and Koyeb actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
Only in Koyeb
- Serverless containers
- GPU support
- Global distribution
- Multi-protocol support
- Serverless Postgres
- Zero-downtime deployments
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Koyeb
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Koyeb
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Koyeb
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Koyeb
Koyeb
- Deploying AI inference models globally with GPU accelerationnot Infracost
- Building SaaS platforms with automatic scalingnot Infracost
- Running distributed AI agents and background workersnot Infracost
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Koyeb
- Pricing starts at $29/month with additional compute costs
- GPU compute is expensive at $0.75-$2.50 per hour
- Limited customization for infrastructure configuration
Pricing, plan by plan
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Koyeb
$29/month- Pro$29/month
- $10 included compute
- 10 users
- 100 services
- Scale$299/month
- $100 included compute
- 50 users
- 1,000 services
- Enterprise$1000/month
- Unlimited users
- Custom resources
- SSO/RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Choose Koyeb if
- You need serverless containers.
- You work on Web, CLI, API.
- You also want gpu support.
Questions people ask
- Is Infracost or Koyeb better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infracost starts at Free and Koyeb at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infracost or Koyeb?
- Infracost has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Infracost and $29/month for Koyeb.
- Does Infracost or Koyeb run on more platforms?
- Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. Koyeb runs on Web, CLI, API.
- Can I use Infracost for free?
- Yes. Infracost has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Koyeb starts at $29/month.
- What is Infracost best used for?
- Infracost is most often used for teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice, platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all, organisations adopting finops practice without buying a full cloud management platform, engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the terraform. Of those, teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice and platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all are not what Koyeb is typically brought in for.
- What can Infracost do that Koyeb cannot?
- Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies. Koyeb covers Serverless containers, GPU support, Global distribution, Multi-protocol support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Koyeb: What are Koyeb's subscription plans?
Pro plan is $29/month with $10 included compute, Scale plan is $299/month with $100 included compute and 99.9% SLA, and Enterprise starts at $1,000/month with unlimited users and 99.99% SLA.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Koyeb: How much does GPU compute cost?
GPU pricing is per-second: RTX-A6000 costs $0.75/hour, A100 costs $1.60/hour, H100 costs $2.50/hour, and 8x H100 costs $20.00/hour.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Koyeb: What database options are available?
Koyeb offers serverless Postgres starting at free (0.25 vCPU, 1GB RAM) up to 3XL at $1.28/hour with 8 vCPU and 32GB RAM. Storage costs $0.50/month per GB.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd
- Infracost vs Render
- Infracost vs Fly.io
- Infracost vs Railway
- Infracost vs Beam Cloud
- Infracost vs Cerebrium
- Infracost vs Northflank
- Infracost vs Upstash
- Infracost vs Deno Deploy
- Infracost vs Neon
- Infracost vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Infracost vs Lambda
- Infracost vs Crossplane
- Infracost vs Dokku
- Koyeb vs Terragrunt
- Koyeb vs Pulumi
- Koyeb vs Packer
- Koyeb vs Serverless Framework
- Koyeb vs SST
- Koyeb vs Coolify
- Koyeb vs CapRover
- Koyeb vs DeepInfra
- Koyeb vs Linode
- Koyeb vs VictoriaMetrics
- Koyeb vs Contabo
- Koyeb vs Chef
- Koyeb vs Cilium
- Koyeb vs Vagrant
- Koyeb vs containerd
- Koyeb vs Render
- Koyeb vs Fly.io
- Koyeb vs Railway
- Koyeb vs Beam Cloud
- Koyeb vs Cerebrium
- Koyeb vs Northflank
- Koyeb vs Upstash
- Koyeb vs Deno Deploy
- Koyeb vs Neon
- Koyeb vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Koyeb vs Lambda
- Koyeb vs Crossplane
- Koyeb vs Dokku
