Cloud · head to head
Dokku vs Infracost

Dokku
Cloud
Single-server platform that accepts a git push and runs Heroku buildpacks on Docker
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dokku one maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.; Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- They diverge on capability: Dokku covers Git push deploy, Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dokku and Infracost actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dokku
- Git push deploy
- Heroku buildpacks
- Datastore plugins
- Automatic certificates
- Zero downtime deploys
- Pluggable schedulers
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dokku
- Running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with Heroku style deploymentnot Infracost
- Moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic hasnot Infracost
- A consultancy that wants buildpack deployments without teaching every client team Kubernetesnot Infracost
- Keeping a legacy Procfile application alive on hardware you control after a managed platform deprecates its stacknot Infracost
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Dokku
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Dokku
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Dokku
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Dokku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dokku
- One maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.
- Dokku Pro asks 849 US dollars for a lifetime licence from a project with no disclosed legal entity behind the promise and no published refund terms, while the product is still described as in development at early bird pricing.
- Dokku is single-server by design, and the k3s scheduler that provides multi-node support is missing log retrieval, process inspection and content-based health checks, with a post-run hook the documentation says does not consistently fire.
- Supported operating systems are limited to Ubuntu 22.04 or 24.04 and Debian 11 or later, so organisations standardised on Red Hat, Rocky or Alma Linux cannot run it on their approved base image.
- Backups are separate commands per datastore plugin that you schedule yourself, with no unified snapshot, no point-in-time recovery and no tested restore path, so verifying that a restore works is entirely your responsibility.
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dokku
Free- DokkuFree
- MIT licensed, no usage limits
- Command line and SSH only
- All datastore and certificate plugins
- Dokku Pro$849/one-time
- Lifetime licence with free upgrades and no subscription
- Covers 1 production and 2 pre-production servers
- Web dashboard and JSON REST API
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Which should you pick?
Choose Dokku if
- You need git push deploy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want heroku buildpacks.
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Dokku or Infracost better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dokku starts at Free and Infracost at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dokku or Infracost?
- Dokku starts at Free and Infracost at Free.
- Does Dokku or Infracost run on more platforms?
- Dokku runs on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Dokku for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dokku best used for?
- Dokku is most often used for running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with heroku style deployment, moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic has, a consultancy that wants buildpack deployments without teaching every client team kubernetes, keeping a legacy procfile application alive on hardware you control after a managed platform deprecates its stack. Of those, running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with heroku style deployment and moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic has are not what Infracost is typically brought in for.
- What can Dokku do that Infracost cannot?
- Dokku covers Git push deploy, Heroku buildpacks, Datastore plugins, Automatic certificates. Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dokku: Is Dokku still maintained?
Yes. Version 0.38.27 shipped in August 2026 with roughly six releases in the preceding two months. The caveat is that one maintainer writes nearly all of it.
Infracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Dokku: What does Dokku Pro give me over the free edition?
A web dashboard, a JSON REST API, git push over HTTPS, browser log tailing, team management and email support from the maintainers. It costs 849 US dollars once for one production and two pre-production servers.
Infracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Dokku: Can Dokku run across multiple servers?
Only through the k3s or Nomad schedulers. The k3s path is missing several commands and health check types, and the older Kubernetes scheduler is deprecated and no longer developed.
Infracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Dokku: Will my Heroku application run on it unchanged?
Usually. Dokku runs the same buildpacks and reads a Procfile, so the application layer normally moves across. Add-ons, scaling behaviour and backups are the parts you have to rebuild.
Infracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dokku vs Fly.io
- Dokku vs Render
- Dokku vs Heroku
- Dokku vs Coolify
- Dokku vs CapRover
- Dokku vs Qovery
- Dokku vs Porter
- Dokku vs Railway
- Dokku vs Northflank
- Dokku vs Podman
- Dokku vs Portworx
- Dokku vs minikube
- Dokku vs Scaleway
- Dokku vs SST
- Dokku vs Tencent Cloud
- Dokku vs Terragrunt
- Dokku vs Skopeo
- Dokku vs Pulumi
- Dokku vs Packer
- Dokku vs Serverless Framework
- Dokku vs DeepInfra
- Dokku vs Linode
- Dokku vs VictoriaMetrics
- Dokku vs Contabo
- Dokku vs Chef
- Dokku vs Cilium
- Dokku vs Vagrant
- Dokku vs containerd
- Infracost vs Fly.io
- Infracost vs Render
- Infracost vs Heroku
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs Qovery
- Infracost vs Porter
- Infracost vs Railway
- Infracost vs Northflank
- Infracost vs Podman
- Infracost vs Portworx
- Infracost vs minikube
- Infracost vs Scaleway
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Tencent Cloud
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Skopeo
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd
