Cloud · head to head
Grafana Cloud vs Infracost

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grafana Cloud active Series (AS) billing model is difficult to predict and control; misconfiguration can cause sudden spikes and unexpected bills; Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- They diverge on capability: Grafana Cloud covers Grafana Dashboards, Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grafana Cloud and Infracost actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grafana Cloud | Infracost |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Free open source tool, then per month by run volume |
| Platforms | Web (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari), API | Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grafana Cloud
- Grafana Dashboards
- Prometheus Metrics
- Loki Logs
- Tempo Traces
- Alerting
- OnCall
- Synthetic Monitoring
- Incident Management
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grafana Cloud
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Infracost
- Application monitoringnot Infracost
- Log aggregationnot Infracost
- Distributed tracingnot Infracost
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Grafana Cloud
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Grafana Cloud
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Grafana Cloud
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Grafana Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grafana Cloud
- Active Series (AS) billing model is difficult to predict and control; misconfiguration can cause sudden spikes and unexpected bills
- Reduced control and customization compared to self-hosted Grafana instances
- Data sovereignty concerns for organizations requiring on-premises data retention
- Limited reporting types compared to traditional BI tools for compliance and audit requirements
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Grafana Cloud
Free- FreeFree
- 10k active series (metrics)
- 50GB logs/traces per month
- 3 active users
- Pro$19/month
- Usage-based pricing beyond free tier
- 8 USD per active visualization user
- Included Grafana Alerting
- Enterprise$25000/year
- Minimum annual commitment
- Full-service deployment options
- Premium support
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Which should you pick?
Choose Grafana Cloud if
- You need grafana dashboards.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari), API.
- You also want prometheus metrics.
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Grafana Cloud or Infracost better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grafana Cloud starts at Free and Infracost at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grafana Cloud or Infracost?
- Grafana Cloud starts at Free and Infracost at Free.
- Does Grafana Cloud or Infracost run on more platforms?
- Grafana Cloud runs on Web (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari), API. Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Grafana Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grafana Cloud best used for?
- Grafana Cloud is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, application monitoring, log aggregation, distributed tracing. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and application monitoring are not what Infracost is typically brought in for.
- What can Grafana Cloud do that Infracost cannot?
- Grafana Cloud covers Grafana Dashboards, Prometheus Metrics, Loki Logs, Tempo Traces. Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grafana Cloud: What are the exact limits of Grafana Cloud's free tier?
Grafana Cloud free tier includes 10,000 active series for metrics, 50GB logs and traces per month, 3 active visualization users, and 14-day retention with community support. No credit card required.
SourceInfracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Grafana Cloud: How is Grafana Cloud billed, and what are the per-unit costs?
Grafana Cloud Pro tier starts at $19/month platform fee plus usage-based charges. Metrics cost $6.50 per 1,000 active series above free limits, logs and traces are charged per GB ingested, and visualization users are $8 per active user.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Grafana Cloud: Can I use Grafana Cloud for open-source Grafana deployments?
Grafana Cloud is the managed cloud service version. Open-source Grafana is free and can be self-hosted indefinitely on your own infrastructure.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Grafana Cloud: What observability signals does Grafana Cloud include?
Grafana Cloud includes metrics (via Mimir), logs (via Loki), traces (via Tempo), profiles, and synthetics, with unified querying and visualization across all signals.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Grafana Cloud: Does Grafana Cloud include alerting and how is it priced?
Yes, Grafana Alerting is included at no additional charge across all tiers. Rule storage, evaluation, and notification delivery are covered by the platform fee with no per-alert or per-notification fees.
SourceInfracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
More on Grafana Cloud
Other head to heads
- Grafana Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Grafana Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- Grafana Cloud vs OVHcloud
- Grafana Cloud vs Scaleway
- Grafana Cloud vs Pulumi
- Grafana Cloud vs Render
- Grafana Cloud vs Fly.io
- Grafana Cloud vs Railway
- Grafana Cloud vs Heroku
- Grafana Cloud vs Vault
- Grafana Cloud vs Proxmox VE
- Grafana Cloud vs Upstash
- Grafana Cloud vs Azure Functions
- Grafana Cloud vs Deno Deploy
- Grafana Cloud vs Hetzner Cloud
- Grafana Cloud vs Jaeger
- Grafana Cloud vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Grafana Cloud vs Terragrunt
- Grafana Cloud vs Packer
- Grafana Cloud vs Serverless Framework
- Grafana Cloud vs SST
- Grafana Cloud vs Coolify
- Grafana Cloud vs CapRover
- Grafana Cloud vs DeepInfra
- Grafana Cloud vs Linode
- Grafana Cloud vs VictoriaMetrics
- Grafana Cloud vs Contabo
- Grafana Cloud vs Chef
- Grafana Cloud vs Cilium
- Grafana Cloud vs Vagrant
- Grafana Cloud vs containerd
- Infracost vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Infracost vs DigitalOcean
- Infracost vs OVHcloud
- Infracost vs Scaleway
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Render
- Infracost vs Fly.io
- Infracost vs Railway
- Infracost vs Heroku
- Infracost vs Vault
- Infracost vs Proxmox VE
- Infracost vs Upstash
- Infracost vs Azure Functions
- Infracost vs Deno Deploy
- Infracost vs Hetzner Cloud
- Infracost vs Jaeger
- Infracost vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd

