Cloud · head to head
Contabo vs Infracost

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Infracost has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Contabo fully unmanaged infrastructure requires all setup and maintenance by customer; Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- They diverge on capability: Contabo covers VPS Hosting, Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Contabo and Infracost actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Contabo
- VPS Hosting
- Dedicated Servers
- Object Storage
- Snapshots
- DDoS Protection
- Custom ISO
- Multiple Locations
- SSD Storage
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Contabo
- Web hostingnot Infracost
- Game serversnot Infracost
- Development environmentsnot Infracost
- VPN serversnot Infracost
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Contabo
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Contabo
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Contabo
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Contabo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Contabo
- Fully unmanaged infrastructure requires all setup and maintenance by customer
- No formal SLA with financial compensation for downtime violations
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Contabo
€4.5/month- Cloud VPS$4.5/month
- 4 vCPU
- 8 GB RAM
- 100 GB SSD
- Cloud VDS$39/month
- Dedicated cores
- 24 GB RAM
- 180 GB NVMe
- Dedicated Server$149/month
- AMD CPU
- 64 GB RAM
- 1 TB NVMe
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Which should you pick?
Choose Contabo if
- You need vps hosting.
- You work on Linux, Windows.
- You also want dedicated servers.
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Contabo or Infracost better?
- Neither clearly leads. Contabo starts at €4.5/month and Infracost at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Contabo or Infracost?
- Infracost has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at €4.5/month for Contabo and Free for Infracost.
- Does Contabo or Infracost run on more platforms?
- Contabo runs on Linux, Windows. Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Infracost for free?
- Yes. Infracost has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Contabo starts at €4.5/month.
- What is Contabo best used for?
- Contabo is most often used for web hosting, game servers, development environments, vpn servers. Of those, web hosting and game servers are not what Infracost is typically brought in for.
- What can Contabo do that Infracost cannot?
- Contabo covers VPS Hosting, Dedicated Servers, Object Storage, Snapshots. Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Contabo: What is the base pricing for Contabo VPS?
Contabo Cloud VPS starts at EUR 4.50 per month (approximately $4.95 USD) with 4 vCPU cores and 8 GB RAM. Prices scale up to EUR 39+ per month for dedicated performance VPS with higher specs.
SourceInfracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Contabo: Does Contabo raise prices at renewal?
No. Unlike many hosting providers, Contabo does not increase renewal prices. The promotional price you get at sign-up is locked in for future renewals.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Contabo: What data center locations does Contabo offer?
Contabo operates 9 global data center regions including multiple EU locations, US East/Central/West Coast, United Kingdom, India, Singapore, Japan, and Australia.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Contabo: Does Contabo provide managed services?
No. Contabo VPS is fully unmanaged. You handle all setup, security patching, and system maintenance. Managed hosting adds 2 hours per month of dedicated support for a fee.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Contabo: What is Contabo's uptime guarantee?
Contabo maintains a 99.996% uptime guarantee across all plans. The platform includes unlimited traffic and free DDoS protection.
SourceInfracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Contabo vs Vultr
- Contabo vs Hetzner Cloud
- Contabo vs Linode
- Contabo vs DigitalOcean
- Contabo vs Scaleway
- Contabo vs Wasabi
- Contabo vs Fastly
- Contabo vs HAProxy
- Contabo vs Koyeb
- Contabo vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Contabo vs Beam Cloud
- Contabo vs Buildah
- Contabo vs CapRover
- Contabo vs Chef
- Contabo vs Cilium
- Contabo vs Coolify
- Contabo vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Contabo vs containerd
- Contabo vs Terragrunt
- Contabo vs Pulumi
- Contabo vs Packer
- Contabo vs Serverless Framework
- Contabo vs SST
- Contabo vs DeepInfra
- Contabo vs VictoriaMetrics
- Contabo vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs Vultr
- Infracost vs Hetzner Cloud
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs DigitalOcean
- Infracost vs Scaleway
- Infracost vs Wasabi
- Infracost vs Fastly
- Infracost vs HAProxy
- Infracost vs Koyeb
- Infracost vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Infracost vs Beam Cloud
- Infracost vs Buildah
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Infracost vs containerd
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Vagrant

