Databases · head to head
Firestore vs Neo4j

Firestore
Databases
Flexible, scalable NoSQL cloud database from Firebase
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Firestore the no-cost Spark plan caps Standard edition at 50,000 document reads, 20,000 writes and 20,000 deletes per day; Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- They diverge on capability: Firestore covers Document Model, Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Firestore and Neo4j actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Firestore
- Document Model
- Real-time Updates
- Offline Support
- Expressive Queries
- Multi-region
- Security Rules
- Firebase Auth
- Cloud Functions
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
- Spring Data
Both cover
- ACID Transactions
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Firestore
- Storing structured application data with realtime listenersnot Neo4j
- Backing mobile and web apps with a serverless document databasenot Neo4j
- Building offline first apps that sync when connectivity returnsnot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Firestore
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Firestore
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Firestore
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Firestore
- The no-cost Spark plan caps Standard edition at 50,000 document reads, 20,000 writes and 20,000 deletes per day
- The Spark plan caps storage at 1 GiB and network egress at 10 GiB per month
- Charging is per document read, so a query returning many documents bills for every one of them
- Going beyond the free thresholds requires the pay as you go Blaze plan billed at Google Cloud rates with no fixed monthly ceiling
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
Firestore
Free- SparkFree
- 1GB storage
- 50K reads/day
- 20K writes/day
- BlazeFree
- Pay as you go
- Unlimited operations
- Multi-region
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Firestore if
- You need document model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Flutter.
- You also want real-time updates.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Firestore or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. Firestore starts at Free and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Firestore or Neo4j?
- Firestore starts at Free and Neo4j at Free.
- Does Firestore or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- Firestore runs on Web, Ios, Android, Flutter. Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Firestore for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Firestore best used for?
- Firestore is most often used for storing structured application data with realtime listeners, backing mobile and web apps with a serverless document database, building offline first apps that sync when connectivity returns. Of those, storing structured application data with realtime listeners and backing mobile and web apps with a serverless document database are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can Firestore do that Neo4j cannot?
- Firestore covers Document Model, Real-time Updates, Offline Support, Expressive Queries. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, High Availability, Graph Data Science. Both handle ACID Transactions, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Firestore: What are the free limits on Cloud Firestore?
The Spark Plan includes 1 GiB of stored data, 50,000 reads per day, 20,000 writes per day, and 20,000 deletes per day at no cost.
SourceNeo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceFirestore: What happens when I exceed the Spark Plan free tier?
Exceeding the free tier requires upgrading to the Blaze Plan, which bills based on actual usage through Google Cloud pricing. Charges apply for reads, writes, deletes, and data storage.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceFirestore: Can I use Firestore without a credit card?
Yes, you can use the Spark Plan indefinitely without a credit card. To use the Blaze Plan (pay-as-you-go), a credit card is required.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceFirestore: Is there a trial period for Cloud Firestore?
No trial period is specified. The Spark Plan free tier serves as the trial, with no time limit.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Firestore vs PostgreSQL
- Firestore vs Airtable
- Firestore vs Cockroach Labs
- Firestore vs Amazon Aurora
- Firestore vs Couchbase
- Firestore vs CouchDB
- Firestore vs RavenDB
- Firestore vs Estuary
- Firestore vs ArangoDB
- Firestore vs ClickHouse
- Firestore vs OpenSearch
- Firestore vs Qdrant
- Firestore vs SingleStore
- Firestore vs TiDB
- Firestore vs Tinybird
- Firestore vs Typesense
- Firestore vs Apache Pinot
- Firestore vs Apache Kafka
- Firestore vs Elasticsearch
- Firestore vs Dgraph
- Firestore vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Firestore vs Cassandra
- Firestore vs Valkey
- Firestore vs Canary Labs
- Firestore vs Chroma
- Firestore vs DynamoDB
- Firestore vs Apache Doris
- Firestore vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs RavenDB
- Neo4j vs Estuary
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs OpenSearch
- Neo4j vs Qdrant
- Neo4j vs SingleStore
- Neo4j vs TiDB
- Neo4j vs Tinybird
- Neo4j vs Typesense
- Neo4j vs Apache Pinot
- Neo4j vs Apache Kafka
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr

