Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs Qdrant

Qdrant
Databases
High-performance vector database for similarity search and embedding-based retrieval
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery; Qdrant free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and Qdrant actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in Qdrant
Nothing recorded that Neo4j does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Qdrant
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Qdrant
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Qdrant
Qdrant
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backends for LLM applicationsnot Neo4j
- Semantic search across large document corporanot Neo4j
- Multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systemsnot Neo4j
- Similarity-based product or content recommendationsnot Neo4j
- Real-time vector indexing for streaming embedding datanot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Qdrant
- Free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Standard and Premium pricing usage-based; specific costs not published; requires calculator or quote
- Requires understanding of embeddings and vector search concepts; not suitable for SQL-only teams
- Early-stage serverless offering (coming soon) suggests maturity gaps in that deployment model
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Qdrant
Free- FreeFree
- Single-node cluster
- 0.5 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- Standard$undefined/usage-based
- Dedicated resources
- Flexible scaling
- High availability
- Premium$undefined/minimum spend
- SSO and SAML
- Private VPC links
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Choose Qdrant if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or Qdrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and Qdrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or Qdrant?
- Neo4j starts at Free and Qdrant at Free.
- Does Neo4j or Qdrant run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. Qdrant runs on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what Qdrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that Qdrant cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceQdrant: Can I use Qdrant for free?
Yes, Qdrant offers a free tier that provides a single node cluster with 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 4GB disk space. It includes free cloud inference with selected models and is described as free forever for testing and prototypes.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceQdrant: How is Qdrant Cloud billing calculated?
Billing is calculated based on actual resource usage during each billing period. You are charged hourly for compute (vCPU), memory (GB), storage (GB), backups, and any paid inference tokens used.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceQdrant: What happens if I scale beyond the free tier?
The Standard Tier uses the same usage-based billing model as the free tier but adds features like dedicated resources with flexible scaling, highly available setups with backup and disaster recovery, and a 99.5% uptime SLA.
SourceQdrant: What SLA does Qdrant offer?
The Standard Tier provides 99.5% uptime SLA. The Premium Tier, which requires a minimum spend for enterprises, offers 99.9% uptime SLA along with single sign-on and private VPC links.
SourceQdrant: Are there dedicated cloud infrastructure options?
Yes, Qdrant offers Hybrid Cloud (runs on your infrastructure) and Private Cloud (complete isolation) options, both with custom pricing that requires contacting the sales team.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs Zilliz
- Neo4j vs Vespa
- Neo4j vs YugabyteDB
- Neo4j vs NATS
- Neo4j vs QuestDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Druid
- Neo4j vs Grist
- Neo4j vs IBM Db2
- Neo4j vs Instaclustr
- Neo4j vs Knack
- Neo4j vs LanceDB
- Neo4j vs Marqo
- Qdrant vs Elasticsearch
- Qdrant vs Cockroach Labs
- Qdrant vs PostgreSQL
- Qdrant vs Airtable
- Qdrant vs Amazon Aurora
- Qdrant vs ArangoDB
- Qdrant vs Dgraph
- Qdrant vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Qdrant vs Couchbase
- Qdrant vs Cassandra
- Qdrant vs Valkey
- Qdrant vs Canary Labs
- Qdrant vs Chroma
- Qdrant vs DynamoDB
- Qdrant vs CouchDB
- Qdrant vs Apache Doris
- Qdrant vs Apache Solr
- Qdrant vs Zilliz
- Qdrant vs Vespa
- Qdrant vs YugabyteDB
- Qdrant vs NATS
- Qdrant vs QuestDB
- Qdrant vs Apache Druid
- Qdrant vs Grist
- Qdrant vs IBM Db2
- Qdrant vs Instaclustr
- Qdrant vs Knack
- Qdrant vs LanceDB
- Qdrant vs Marqo

