Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs SingleStore

SingleStore
Databases
The real-time distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery; SingleStore high licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- They diverge on capability: Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and SingleStore actually diverge.
| Attribute | Neo4j | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web | Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed |
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in SingleStore
- Real-time Analytics
- Fast Data Ingest
- In-memory Processing
- Distributed Architecture
- MySQL Compatible
- Columnar Storage
- Vector Search
- Spark
Both cover
- Kafka
- Linux support
- Docker support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot SingleStore
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot SingleStore
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot SingleStore
SingleStore
- Transaction processingnot Neo4j
- Data storagenot Neo4j
- Application backendnot Neo4j
- Reportingnot Neo4j
- Data analyticsnot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
SingleStore
- High licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- Eventual consistency in replication: secondary replicas may lag during high write loads
- Complex operational setup requiring specialized knowledge for optimization
- Vendor lock-in due to proprietary technology without open-source alternatives
- Disorganized documentation and lack of online training resources
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
SingleStore
Free- Free Tier$0.99/month
- Usage-based pricing
- Limited resources
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Choose SingleStore if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- You also want fast data ingest.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or SingleStore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and SingleStore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or SingleStore?
- Neo4j starts at Free and SingleStore at Free.
- Does Neo4j or SingleStore run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. SingleStore runs on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what SingleStore is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that SingleStore cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics, Fast Data Ingest, In-memory Processing, Distributed Architecture. Both handle Kafka, Linux support, Docker support, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceSingleStore: Does SingleStore offer a free tier?
Yes, SingleStore offers a free tier starting from $0.99/month with usage-based pricing. The free tier allows developers to evaluate the platform with limited resources before scaling to production workloads.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceSingleStore: Can SingleStore handle both transactional and analytical workloads?
Yes, SingleStore is a hybrid transactional/analytical processing (HTAP) database that combines operational (OLTP) and analytical (OLAP) workloads in a single unified engine, eliminating the need for separate systems.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceSingleStore: Does SingleStore integrate with Apache Spark?
Yes, SingleStore provides the Spark Connector 3.0 for bidirectional data integration with Apache Spark. The connector supports SQL, Python, Scala, Java, and R for data loading and extraction.
SourceSingleStore: Can SingleStore ingest data from Kafka?
Yes, SingleStore supports high-throughput streaming ingestion from Apache Kafka and other sources, enabling millions of events per second without requiring ETL pipelines or data movement.
SourceSingleStore: Is SingleStore available as cloud or self-managed?
SingleStore offers both deployment options: SingleStoreDB Cloud (managed service) and SingleStore Self-Managed for on-premises or private cloud deployments. The managed service handles infrastructure, scaling, and maintenance automatically.
SourceRelated pages
More on SingleStore
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs Apache Druid
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs DuckDB
- Neo4j vs TiDB
- Neo4j vs Materialize
- Neo4j vs TimescaleDB
- Neo4j vs Estuary
- Neo4j vs Fivetran HVR
- Neo4j vs Firebolt
- Neo4j vs Nile
- Neo4j vs Ninox
- Neo4j vs Presto
- Neo4j vs Privacera
- Neo4j vs RavenDB
- Neo4j vs Readyset
- Neo4j vs Apache Pinot
- Neo4j vs Apache Flink
- SingleStore vs Elasticsearch
- SingleStore vs Cockroach Labs
- SingleStore vs PostgreSQL
- SingleStore vs Airtable
- SingleStore vs Amazon Aurora
- SingleStore vs ArangoDB
- SingleStore vs Dgraph
- SingleStore vs Firebase Realtime Database
- SingleStore vs Couchbase
- SingleStore vs Cassandra
- SingleStore vs Valkey
- SingleStore vs Canary Labs
- SingleStore vs Chroma
- SingleStore vs DynamoDB
- SingleStore vs CouchDB
- SingleStore vs Apache Doris
- SingleStore vs Apache Solr
- SingleStore vs Apache Druid
- SingleStore vs ClickHouse
- SingleStore vs DuckDB
- SingleStore vs TiDB
- SingleStore vs Materialize
- SingleStore vs TimescaleDB
- SingleStore vs Estuary
- SingleStore vs Fivetran HVR
- SingleStore vs Firebolt
- SingleStore vs Nile
- SingleStore vs Ninox
- SingleStore vs Presto
- SingleStore vs Privacera
- SingleStore vs RavenDB
- SingleStore vs Readyset
- SingleStore vs Apache Pinot
- SingleStore vs Apache Flink

