Database & Data Management · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Firestore

Cockroach Labs
Database & Data Management
The cloud-native distributed SQL database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Firestore
Database & Data Management
Flexible, scalable NoSQL cloud database from Firebase
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); Firestore the no-cost Spark plan caps Standard edition at 50,000 document reads, 20,000 writes and 20,000 deletes per day
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Firestore covers Document Model.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Firestore actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Firestore |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Web, Ios, Android, Flutter |
| Founded | 2015 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Database & Data Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
- Kubernetes
Only in Firestore
- Document Model
- Real-time Updates
- Offline Support
- Expressive Queries
- Multi-region
- Security Rules
- Firebase Auth
- Cloud Functions
Both cover
- ACID Transactions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Firestore
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Firestore
Firestore
- Storing structured application data with realtime listenersnot Cockroach Labs
- Backing mobile and web apps with a serverless document databasenot Cockroach Labs
- Building offline first apps that sync when connectivity returnsnot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Firestore
- The no-cost Spark plan caps Standard edition at 50,000 document reads, 20,000 writes and 20,000 deletes per day
- The Spark plan caps storage at 1 GiB and network egress at 10 GiB per month
- Charging is per document read, so a query returning many documents bills for every one of them
- Going beyond the free thresholds requires the pay as you go Blaze plan billed at Google Cloud rates with no fixed monthly ceiling
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Firestore
Free- SparkFree
- 1GB storage
- 50K reads/day
- 20K writes/day
- BlazeFree
- Pay as you go
- Unlimited operations
- Multi-region
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Firestore if
- You need document model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Flutter.
- You also want real-time updates.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Firestore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Firestore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Firestore?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Firestore at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Firestore run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Firestore runs on Web, Ios, Android, Flutter.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Firestore is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Firestore cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. Firestore covers Document Model, Real-time Updates, Offline Support, Expressive Queries. Both handle ACID Transactions.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt
- Firestore vs PostgreSQL
- Firestore vs Airtable
- Firestore vs Amazon Aurora
- Firestore vs Elasticsearch
- Firestore vs PlanetScale
- Firestore vs Azure SQL
- Firestore vs ClickHouse
- Firestore vs Couchbase
- Firestore vs DuckDB
- Firestore vs DynamoDB
- Firestore vs MariaDB
- Firestore vs Oracle Database
- Firestore vs Amazon RDS
- Firestore vs Amazon Redshift
- Firestore vs Apache Druid
- Firestore vs Cassandra
- Firestore vs CouchDB
- Firestore vs Firebolt
