Databases · head to head
ClickHouse vs Neo4j

ClickHouse
Databases
Fast open-source column-oriented database for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ClickHouse limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems; Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- They diverge on capability: ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ClickHouse and Neo4j actually diverge.
| Attribute | ClickHouse | Neo4j |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker) | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web |
| Founded | 2021 | 2007 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ClickHouse
- Column-oriented Storage
- Real-time Analytics
- SQL Support
- Linear Scalability
- Data Compression
- Vectorized Query Execution
- Approximate Calculations
- S3
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Both cover
- Kafka
- Linux support
- Mac support
- Docker support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ClickHouse
- Business intelligencenot Neo4j
- Data warehousingnot Neo4j
- Real-time analyticsnot Neo4j
- Reportingnot Neo4j
- Machine learningnot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot ClickHouse
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot ClickHouse
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot ClickHouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ClickHouse
- Limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems
- Requires upfront schema design discipline with MergeTree engine choices and sort/partition keys
- Experimental vector search support, not production-ready for vector operations
- Different query syntax from standard SQL requiring migration planning
- Limited JOIN capabilities compared to traditional relational databases
- Migration complexity with 2-4 weeks estimated for data type mapping and query translation
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
ClickHouse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ClickHouse review.
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Which should you pick?
Choose ClickHouse if
- You need column-oriented storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker).
- You also want real-time analytics.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is ClickHouse or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. ClickHouse starts at Free and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ClickHouse or Neo4j?
- ClickHouse starts at Free and Neo4j at Free.
- Does ClickHouse or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- ClickHouse runs on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker). Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use ClickHouse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ClickHouse best used for?
- ClickHouse is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can ClickHouse do that Neo4j cannot?
- ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, Real-time Analytics, SQL Support, Linear Scalability. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Both handle Kafka, Linux support, Mac support, Docker support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ClickHouse: What is ClickHouse best used for?
ClickHouse is optimized for analytical workloads on large datasets. It excels at fast aggregations and queries, being 10-100x faster than PostgreSQL on large aggregations.
SourceNeo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceClickHouse: Does ClickHouse support transactions?
ClickHouse has limited transaction support and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations. It is not suitable for transactional workloads requiring strict ACID guarantees.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceClickHouse: How does ClickHouse compare to PostgreSQL?
ClickHouse is 10-100x faster for analytics but PostgreSQL is better for transactional workloads. Many teams use both: PostgreSQL for writes via MaterializedPostgreSQL replication to ClickHouse for analytics.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ClickHouse vs Apache Druid
- ClickHouse vs SingleStore
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Redshift
- ClickHouse vs TimescaleDB
- ClickHouse vs Tinybird
- ClickHouse vs Timeplus
- ClickHouse vs StarRocks
- ClickHouse vs Presto
- ClickHouse vs DuckDB
- ClickHouse vs Valkey
- ClickHouse vs ArangoDB
- ClickHouse vs Canary Labs
- ClickHouse vs Chroma
- ClickHouse vs Apache Pinot
- ClickHouse vs Apache Doris
- ClickHouse vs Cassandra
- ClickHouse vs Apache Solr
- ClickHouse vs Elasticsearch
- ClickHouse vs Cockroach Labs
- ClickHouse vs PostgreSQL
- ClickHouse vs Airtable
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Aurora
- ClickHouse vs Dgraph
- ClickHouse vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ClickHouse vs Couchbase
- ClickHouse vs DynamoDB
- ClickHouse vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Druid
- Neo4j vs SingleStore
- Neo4j vs Amazon Redshift
- Neo4j vs TimescaleDB
- Neo4j vs Tinybird
- Neo4j vs Timeplus
- Neo4j vs StarRocks
- Neo4j vs Presto
- Neo4j vs DuckDB
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs Apache Pinot
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB

