Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs OpenSearch

OpenSearch
Databases
Open-source search and analytics suite forked from Elasticsearch
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery; OpenSearch diverged from Elasticsearch since 7.10, so clients, plugins and features no longer map one to one
- They diverge on capability: Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, OpenSearch covers Full-text search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and OpenSearch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Neo4j | OpenSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee; managed services billed separately |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2007 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in OpenSearch
- Full-text search
- OpenSearch Dashboards
- Log analytics
- Vector search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot OpenSearch
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot OpenSearch
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot OpenSearch
OpenSearch
- Log and observability storage where an Apache-2.0 licence is a requirementnot Neo4j
- Replacing Elasticsearch after the licence change without changing architecturenot Neo4j
- Search plus analytics on one cluster rather than two systemsnot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
OpenSearch
- Diverged from Elasticsearch since 7.10, so clients, plugins and features no longer map one to one
- Operationally heavy in the way Elasticsearch is: cluster sizing, shard strategy and JVM tuning are ongoing work
- Smaller ecosystem of third-party tooling than Elasticsearch, which most integrations still target first
- Overkill for plain application search, where a dedicated search engine is far simpler
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
OpenSearch
Free- OpenSearchFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Choose OpenSearch if
- You need full-text search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want opensearch dashboards.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or OpenSearch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and OpenSearch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or OpenSearch?
- Neo4j starts at Free and OpenSearch at Free.
- Does Neo4j or OpenSearch run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. OpenSearch runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what OpenSearch is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that OpenSearch cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. OpenSearch covers Full-text search, OpenSearch Dashboards, Log analytics, Vector search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceOpenSearch: Is OpenSearch free?
Yes, Apache 2.0 licensed under the Linux Foundation. Amazon OpenSearch Service is a paid managed option.
Neo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceOpenSearch: Why does OpenSearch exist?
Elastic moved Elasticsearch off the Apache 2.0 licence in 2021. AWS forked the last Apache-licensed version, and the project now sits under the Linux Foundation.
Neo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceOpenSearch: Is OpenSearch compatible with Elasticsearch?
It was at the 7.10 fork point. Both have developed independently since, so compatibility weakens with every release and should be verified for the features you use.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs Meilisearch
- Neo4j vs DuckDB
- Neo4j vs Typesense
- Neo4j vs QuestDB
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs MariaDB
- Neo4j vs TimescaleDB
- Neo4j vs LanceDB
- Neo4j vs Marqo
- Neo4j vs Nile
- Neo4j vs Ninox
- Neo4j vs Privacera
- Neo4j vs RavenDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Flink
- Neo4j vs Apache Kafka
- Neo4j vs Apache Druid
- OpenSearch vs Elasticsearch
- OpenSearch vs Cockroach Labs
- OpenSearch vs PostgreSQL
- OpenSearch vs Airtable
- OpenSearch vs Amazon Aurora
- OpenSearch vs ArangoDB
- OpenSearch vs Dgraph
- OpenSearch vs Firebase Realtime Database
- OpenSearch vs Couchbase
- OpenSearch vs Cassandra
- OpenSearch vs Valkey
- OpenSearch vs Canary Labs
- OpenSearch vs Chroma
- OpenSearch vs DynamoDB
- OpenSearch vs CouchDB
- OpenSearch vs Apache Doris
- OpenSearch vs Apache Solr
- OpenSearch vs Meilisearch
- OpenSearch vs DuckDB
- OpenSearch vs Typesense
- OpenSearch vs QuestDB
- OpenSearch vs ClickHouse
- OpenSearch vs MariaDB
- OpenSearch vs TimescaleDB
- OpenSearch vs LanceDB
- OpenSearch vs Marqo
- OpenSearch vs Nile
- OpenSearch vs Ninox
- OpenSearch vs Privacera
- OpenSearch vs RavenDB
- OpenSearch vs Apache Flink
- OpenSearch vs Apache Kafka
- OpenSearch vs Apache Druid

