Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Ping Identity
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Fig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fig | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $3/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Ping Identity does not also cover.
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Fig
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Fig
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Fig
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Ping Identity?
- Fig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fig and $3/month for Ping Identity.
- Does Fig or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Yes. Fig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ping Identity starts at $3/month.
- What can Fig do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Fig vs Frontegg
- Fig vs Speakeasy
- Fig vs Akeyless
- Fig vs authentik
- Fig vs Logto
- Fig vs Authelia
- Fig vs Transmit Security
- Fig vs Delinea
- Fig vs Genetec Security Center
- Fig vs VMware Carbon Black
- Fig vs Rhombus Systems
- Fig vs Yoti
- Fig vs Avast One
- Fig vs Chainguard
- Fig vs Cosign
- Fig vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Visual Studio Code
- Ping Identity vs ESLint
- Ping Identity vs Turborepo
- Ping Identity vs pnpm
- Ping Identity vs Sweep
- Ping Identity vs Cody
- Ping Identity vs Warp
- Ping Identity vs Keycloak
- Ping Identity vs Rust
- Ping Identity vs CodeSandbox
- Ping Identity vs Vite
- Ping Identity vs Daytona
- Ping Identity vs Visual Studio
- Ping Identity vs Xlinesoft
- Ping Identity vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ping Identity vs Sourcegraph
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
