Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Transmit Security
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Fig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fig | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Transmit Security does not also cover.
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Fig
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Fig
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Fig
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Transmit Security?
- Fig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fig and On request for Transmit Security.
- Does Fig or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Yes. Fig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Transmit Security starts at On request.
- What can Fig do that Transmit Security cannot?
- Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Transmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Transmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Transmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Related pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Descope
- Fig vs NICE Actimize
- Fig vs Beyond Identity
- Fig vs Sardine
- Fig vs Feedzai
- Fig vs Socure
- Fig vs Unit21
- Fig vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Fig vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Fig vs Ping Identity
- Fig vs Stytch
- Fig vs Rhombus Systems
- Fig vs Semgrep
- Fig vs Spot AI
- Fig vs Syft
- Fig vs ThetaRay
- Fig vs Trivy
- Fig vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Visual Studio Code
- Transmit Security vs ESLint
- Transmit Security vs Turborepo
- Transmit Security vs pnpm
- Transmit Security vs Sweep
- Transmit Security vs Cody
- Transmit Security vs Warp
- Transmit Security vs Keycloak
- Transmit Security vs Rust
- Transmit Security vs CodeSandbox
- Transmit Security vs Vite
- Transmit Security vs Daytona
- Transmit Security vs Visual Studio
- Transmit Security vs Xlinesoft
- Transmit Security vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Transmit Security vs Sourcegraph
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo
