Maps · head to head
SW Maps vs Transit

SW Maps
Maps
Free Android GIS data collector that pairs with external RTK GNSS receivers
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Transit
Maps
Public transit trip planning and real-time arrivals for buses, trains and shared bikes and scooters
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SW Maps android only. There is no iOS version and no sign of one, which rules it out for organisations that issue iPhones and iPads to field staff.; Transit coverage depends entirely on whether the local transit agency publishes a real-time feed, so quality swings sharply between well-funded metro systems and smaller regional operators.
- They diverge on capability: SW Maps covers Custom feature layers, Transit covers Real-time arrivals.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SW Maps and Transit actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SW Maps
- Custom feature layers
- External GNSS support
- Offline basemaps
- Geospatial PDF layers
- Vector import
- Photo and media capture
- Export formats
- NTRIP client
Only in Transit
- Real-time arrivals
- Multi-modal trip planning
- Service alerts
- In-app fare payment
- Offline schedules
- GO transit and micromobility layers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SW Maps
- An NGO or municipal utility mapping water points, pipe networks or road assets on a budget that cannot absorb per-user GIS subscriptionsnot Transit
- A survey team pairing a low-cost RTK receiver with Android tablets to collect centimetre-accurate attributed features without buying field software seatsnot Transit
- A university field course teaching GNSS data collection where every student needs the tool on their own devicenot Transit
- A consultant doing a one-off asset inventory who needs shapefile or GeoPackage output and does not want to start an annual subscription for a three-week jobnot Transit
Transit
- A commuter in a city with a well-maintained GTFS-realtime feed wanting live bus and train arrivalsnot SW Maps
- A rider comparing a transit trip against a bike share or scooter leg for the last milenot SW Maps
- A visitor needing offline-capable static schedules in a city with patchy data coveragenot SW Maps
- Someone wanting to buy a transit fare inside the same app used to plan the trip, in supported citiesnot SW Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SW Maps
- Android only. There is no iOS version and no sign of one, which rules it out for organisations that issue iPhones and iPads to field staff.
- There is no back end: no user management, no central project sync, no audit trail. Data lives on the device until someone exports it, and a lost tablet is lost data.
- No commercial support contract exists, so an organisation with a compliance requirement for vendor support cannot use it for regulated work regardless of technical fit.
- It is maintained by a small consultancy as a side product of its own project work, so the roadmap follows Softwel’s needs and a feature you depend on may never be prioritised.
- Form logic is basic compared with dedicated survey platforms: no meaningful skip logic, validation or multi-user assignment, so complex questionnaires quickly outgrow it.
Transit
- Coverage depends entirely on whether the local transit agency publishes a real-time feed, so quality swings sharply between well-funded metro systems and smaller regional operators.
- The company earns its revenue by selling agencies a paid analytics product built from rider trip data, which means the free app functions partly as a data-collection layer for a business customer, not only as a public service.
- In-app fare payment is only available in a limited set of cities, so the headline feature is not something most riders can actually use.
- Static schedule fallback in low-data cities is only as accurate as the agency last published, and service changes can go unreflected for weeks.
- The app has no offline routing without a cached area, so it is not reliable for navigation in areas with poor mobile signal.
Pricing, plan by plan
SW Maps
Free- SW MapsFree
- All features included
- External RTK GNSS support
- Unlimited layers and exports
Transit
Free- Rider appFree
- Real-time arrivals and trip planning
- No ads shown to riders
- In-app fare purchase where supported
Which should you pick?
Choose SW Maps if
- You need custom feature layers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Android.
- You also want external gnss support.
Choose Transit if
- You need real-time arrivals.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want multi-modal trip planning.
Questions people ask
- Is SW Maps or Transit better?
- Neither clearly leads. SW Maps starts at Free and Transit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SW Maps or Transit?
- SW Maps starts at Free and Transit at Free.
- Does SW Maps or Transit run on more platforms?
- SW Maps runs on Android. Transit runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use SW Maps for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is SW Maps best used for?
- SW Maps is most often used for an ngo or municipal utility mapping water points, pipe networks or road assets on a budget that cannot absorb per-user gis subscriptions, a survey team pairing a low-cost rtk receiver with android tablets to collect centimetre-accurate attributed features without buying field software seats, a university field course teaching gnss data collection where every student needs the tool on their own device, a consultant doing a one-off asset inventory who needs shapefile or geopackage output and does not want to start an annual subscription for a three-week job. Of those, an ngo or municipal utility mapping water points, pipe networks or road assets on a budget that cannot absorb per-user gis subscriptions and a survey team pairing a low-cost rtk receiver with android tablets to collect centimetre-accurate attributed features without buying field software seats are not what Transit is typically brought in for.
- What can SW Maps do that Transit cannot?
- SW Maps covers Custom feature layers, External GNSS support, Offline basemaps, Geospatial PDF layers. Transit covers Real-time arrivals, Multi-modal trip planning, Service alerts, In-app fare payment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SW Maps: Is SW Maps really free?
Yes. It is free with no advertising and no paid tier. There is no subscription and no feature paywall.
Transit: Does Transit cost anything to use?
No. The rider app is free with no subscription and no ads; the company earns money separately by selling agencies a paid data and communication platform.
SW Maps: Does it support RTK receivers?
Yes, over Bluetooth or USB serial, with NTRIP correction support, antenna height and per-point fix quality recording.
Transit: Does it work in every city?
No. Coverage depends on whether the local transit agency publishes a GTFS or GTFS-realtime feed; some smaller markets have static schedules only.
SW Maps: Is there an iOS version?
No. Android only.
Transit: Can I buy a bus or train ticket in the app?
Only in cities where the local agency has integrated fare payment; elsewhere you still need the agency app or a physical ticket.
SW Maps: Who maintains it?
Softwel, an engineering consultancy in Kathmandu, Nepal, which built it for its own infrastructure projects.
SW Maps: Can we get support?
Not contractually. There is no commercial support agreement, which is the main reason organisations with compliance obligations choose a paid alternative.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- SW Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- SW Maps vs QGIS
- SW Maps vs Emlid Studio
- SW Maps vs Leica Infinity
- SW Maps vs onX Maps
- SW Maps vs Felt
- SW Maps vs IndoorAtlas
- SW Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- SW Maps vs Mapbox
- SW Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- SW Maps vs Gaia GPS
- SW Maps vs GraphHopper
- SW Maps vs GRASS GIS
- SW Maps vs HERE WeGo
- SW Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- SW Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- SW Maps vs Citymapper
- SW Maps vs Ride with GPS
- SW Maps vs Google Maps
- SW Maps vs MapQuest
- SW Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- SW Maps vs Waze
- SW Maps vs Apple Maps
- SW Maps vs CARTO
- Transit vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Transit vs QGIS
- Transit vs Emlid Studio
- Transit vs Leica Infinity
- Transit vs onX Maps
- Transit vs Felt
- Transit vs IndoorAtlas
- Transit vs Agisoft Metashape
- Transit vs Mapbox
- Transit vs Google Maps Platform
- Transit vs Gaia GPS
- Transit vs GraphHopper
- Transit vs GRASS GIS
- Transit vs HERE WeGo
- Transit vs Esri ArcGIS
- Transit vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Transit vs Citymapper
- Transit vs Ride with GPS
- Transit vs Google Maps
- Transit vs MapQuest
- Transit vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Transit vs Waze
- Transit vs Apple Maps
- Transit vs CARTO
