Softwr

Legal · head to head

Aderant vs Everlaw

Aderant logo

Aderant

Legal

Practice and financial management for large law firms

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Everlaw logo

Everlaw

Legal

Cloud ediscovery and litigation platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Aderant implementation is a programme of work with consultants and data migration, so the licence fee is a minority of the real first year cost.; Everlaw quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance
  • They diverge on capability: Aderant covers Aderant Expert, Everlaw covers Document processing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Aderant and Everlaw actually diverge.

Attributes where Aderant and Everlaw differ
AttributeAderantEverlaw
PlatformsWindows, Web, iOS, AndroidWeb, Cloud

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Aderant

  • Aderant Expert
  • Conflicts and new business intake
  • Docketing and calendaring
  • Multi-currency and multi-entity billing
  • Business intelligence

Only in Everlaw

  • Document processing
  • Predictive coding
  • Review workflow
  • Search and clustering
  • Case building
  • Cloud-native

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Aderant

  • Firms of a hundred or more fee earners needing matter financials across multiple offices and currenciesnot Everlaw
  • Practices replacing an ageing time and billing system without leaving the large firm segmentnot Everlaw
  • Firms needing conflicts checking and new business intake governed by an approval workflownot Everlaw
  • Partnerships reporting profitability by practice group and requiring realisation analysisnot Everlaw

Everlaw

  • Litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document setsnot Aderant
  • Government and corporate investigations requiring defensible reviewnot Aderant
  • Firms wanting ediscovery without running on-premise infrastructurenot Aderant

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Aderant

  • Implementation is a programme of work with consultants and data migration, so the licence fee is a minority of the real first year cost.
  • It is designed for large firms, so a practice below roughly fifty fee earners pays for governance and reporting depth it will never use.
  • Ownership by an acquisitive holding company tends to mean predictable maintenance uplifts at renewal rather than competitive discounting.
  • The credible alternative set is effectively one other product, which weakens a firm's negotiating position because switching is genuinely expensive.
  • Nothing about pricing is published, so budgeting requires a sales engagement and useful comparisons come only from peer firms.

Everlaw

  • Quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance
  • Specialist product: outside litigation and investigations there is no use for it
  • Predictive coding requires a properly trained review workflow, and poor input produces unreliable prioritisation
  • Data volume charges can escalate sharply on large matters

Pricing, plan by plan

Aderant

On request
  • Aderant Expert$undefined/year
    • Enterprise licensing quoted per firm
    • Implementation, migration and consultancy quoted separately
    • Annual maintenance and support

Everlaw

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Everlaw review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Aderant if

  • You need aderant expert.
  • You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want conflicts and new business intake.
Aderant review

Choose Everlaw if

  • You need document processing.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want predictive coding.
Everlaw review

Questions people ask

Is Aderant or Everlaw better?
Neither clearly leads. Aderant starts at On request and Everlaw at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Aderant or Everlaw?
Aderant starts at On request and Everlaw at On request.
Does Aderant or Everlaw run on more platforms?
Aderant runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Everlaw runs on Web, Cloud.
What is Aderant best used for?
Aderant is most often used for firms of a hundred or more fee earners needing matter financials across multiple offices and currencies, practices replacing an ageing time and billing system without leaving the large firm segment, firms needing conflicts checking and new business intake governed by an approval workflow, partnerships reporting profitability by practice group and requiring realisation analysis. Of those, firms of a hundred or more fee earners needing matter financials across multiple offices and currencies and practices replacing an ageing time and billing system without leaving the large firm segment are not what Everlaw is typically brought in for.
What can Aderant do that Everlaw cannot?
Aderant covers Aderant Expert, Conflicts and new business intake, Docketing and calendaring, Multi-currency and multi-entity billing. Everlaw covers Document processing, Predictive coding, Review workflow, Search and clustering.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Aderant: Who owns Aderant?

Roper Technologies acquired Aderant in 2015. Roper buys and holds vertical market software businesses, which in practice means long product support and steady renewal pricing rather than rapid change.

Everlaw: What does Everlaw cost?

Everlaw does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally priced on data volume and users, which is why costs are quoted per matter or per organisation.

Aderant: What size of firm is Aderant for?

Large firms, broadly a hundred fee earners and above. Smaller practices are better served by Clio, Tabs3 or Smokeball.

Everlaw: What is ediscovery?

The process of identifying, collecting and reviewing electronic documents as evidence in litigation or investigation.

Aderant: What does it compete with?

Thomson Reuters Elite 3E is the main alternative at this size, and most large firm selections come down to those two.

Everlaw: What is predictive coding?

Machine learning trained on reviewer decisions to prioritise documents likely to be relevant, so a team reviews the important fraction rather than everything.

Everlaw: Is Everlaw only for law firms?

No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.

Share

Related pages

More on Aderant

More on Everlaw

Keep looking

Other head to heads