Softwr

Legal · head to head

Actionstep vs Everlaw

Actionstep logo

Actionstep

Legal

Configurable legal practice and accounting management platform sold as two separate products, priced per user with no published rate

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Everlaw logo

Everlaw

Legal

Cloud ediscovery and litigation platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Actionstep no pricing is published beyond a rough $60 a month starting figure; real cost including implementation and add-ons requires a sales quote and can rise substantially, as one documented case showed a fourfold increase within a year.; Everlaw quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance
  • They diverge on capability: Actionstep covers Configurable workflows, Everlaw covers Document processing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Actionstep and Everlaw actually diverge.

Attributes where Actionstep and Everlaw differ
AttributeActionstepEverlaw
Pricing modelPer user per monthquote
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, Cloud

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Actionstep

  • Configurable workflows
  • Legal Accounting
  • Builder
  • Capture
  • Trace
  • Acumen

Only in Everlaw

  • Document processing
  • Predictive coding
  • Review workflow
  • Search and clustering
  • Case building
  • Cloud-native

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Actionstep

  • A firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structurenot Everlaw
  • A US firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter managementnot Everlaw
  • A firm using AI time capture to reduce billing leakage from unrecorded worknot Everlaw
  • A growing mid-size firm wanting embedded analytics on matter profitability without exporting to a separate BI toolnot Everlaw

Everlaw

  • Litigation teams reviewing very large discovery document setsnot Actionstep
  • Government and corporate investigations requiring defensible reviewnot Actionstep
  • Firms wanting ediscovery without running on-premise infrastructurenot Actionstep

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Actionstep

  • No pricing is published beyond a rough $60 a month starting figure; real cost including implementation and add-ons requires a sales quote and can rise substantially, as one documented case showed a fourfold increase within a year.
  • The configurability that is the main selling point means implementation is a genuine project requiring firm time to design workflows, not a same-day signup like more templated competitors.
  • Legal Accounting is sold as a separate North America-only product, so international firms cannot get the full accounting feature set through the same purchase.
  • Reviewer base skews heavily toward small firms, and Actionstep itself is candid that most of its reviews come from small businesses, which is a signal about where the product is proven at scale.
  • Add-on modules (Builder, Capture, Trace, Acumen) are each additional cost, so a firm comparing Actionstep to an all-in-one competitor needs to price in modules separately to get a fair comparison.

Everlaw

  • Quote-only pricing, and ediscovery is typically billed on data volume, which makes costs hard to predict in advance
  • Specialist product: outside litigation and investigations there is no use for it
  • Predictive coding requires a properly trained review workflow, and poor input produces unreliable prioritisation
  • Data volume charges can escalate sharply on large matters

Pricing, plan by plan

Actionstep

On request
  • Practice Management$undefined/month
    • Starts around $60 per user per month, quote required for exact rate
    • Implementation fees charged separately
    • Priced per user, varies by region (US, UK, AU, NZ, CAD)
  • Legal Accounting$undefined/month
    • North America only
    • Sold separately from or combined with Practice Management
    • Add-on modules (Builder, Capture, Trace, Acumen) priced separately

Everlaw

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Everlaw review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Actionstep if

  • You need configurable workflows.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want legal accounting.
Actionstep review

Choose Everlaw if

  • You need document processing.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want predictive coding.
Everlaw review

Questions people ask

Is Actionstep or Everlaw better?
Neither clearly leads. Actionstep starts at On request and Everlaw at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Actionstep or Everlaw?
Actionstep starts at On request and Everlaw at On request.
Does Actionstep or Everlaw run on more platforms?
Actionstep runs on Web, iOS, Android. Everlaw runs on Web, Cloud.
What is Actionstep best used for?
Actionstep is most often used for a firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structure, a us firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter management, a firm using ai time capture to reduce billing leakage from unrecorded work, a growing mid-size firm wanting embedded analytics on matter profitability without exporting to a separate bi tool. Of those, a firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structure and a us firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter management are not what Everlaw is typically brought in for.
What can Actionstep do that Everlaw cannot?
Actionstep covers Configurable workflows, Legal Accounting, Builder, Capture. Everlaw covers Document processing, Predictive coding, Review workflow, Search and clustering.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Actionstep: Is Actionstep pricing published?

No. The pricing page gives no rate card; you must request a quote, and cost is per user plus implementation fees, varying by region.

Everlaw: What does Everlaw cost?

Everlaw does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally priced on data volume and users, which is why costs are quoted per matter or per organisation.

Actionstep: Can I buy just the accounting product?

Yes, Legal Accounting is sold separately from Practice Management, though it is limited to North America.

Everlaw: What is ediscovery?

The process of identifying, collecting and reviewing electronic documents as evidence in litigation or investigation.

Actionstep: Does it work like Clio or MyCase out of the box?

Not exactly. Actionstep leans on firm-configured workflows rather than fixed templates, which means more setup but a closer eventual fit to how the firm works.

Everlaw: What is predictive coding?

Machine learning trained on reviewer decisions to prioritise documents likely to be relevant, so a team reviews the important fraction rather than everything.

Everlaw: Is Everlaw only for law firms?

No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.

Share

Related pages

More on Actionstep

More on Everlaw

Keep looking

Other head to heads