Legal · head to head
Intapp vs Relativity

Intapp
Legal
Risk, compliance and business intake software for professional services firms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Relativity
Legal
Ediscovery and legal data platform for large matters
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Intapp the product set is modular, so the cost of a working risk and intake configuration is well above the entry module a firm first prices.; Relativity quote-only and expensive, typically billed on data volume, so costs escalate with matter size
- They diverge on capability: Intapp covers Conflicts and business intake, Relativity covers Large-scale processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Intapp and Relativity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Intapp | Relativity |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, Cloud, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Intapp
- Conflicts and business intake
- Confidentiality walls
- Time capture
- DealCloud
- Outside counsel guidelines compliance
Only in Relativity
- Large-scale processing
- Review workflow
- Analytics and active learning
- Application ecosystem
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Intapp
- Large firms formalising conflicts clearance and matter opening approvalsnot Relativity
- Practices that must demonstrate confidentiality walls rather than assert them as policynot Relativity
- Firms losing revenue to outside counsel guideline breaches caught only after invoicingnot Relativity
- Advisory and capital markets teams needing deal pipeline and relationship managementnot Relativity
Relativity
- Large litigation with very high document volumesnot Intapp
- Corporate investigations requiring defensible, auditable reviewnot Intapp
- Firms whose review process is already built around the platformnot Intapp
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Intapp
- The product set is modular, so the cost of a working risk and intake configuration is well above the entry module a firm first prices.
- It assumes a firm large enough to have dedicated risk and compliance staff, and smaller practices have nobody to own the workflows it introduces.
- It sits alongside document management and billing rather than replacing them, adding integration work to an already complex estate.
- Pricing is not published, and the modular structure makes peer comparison harder because two firms rarely buy the same combination.
- Deployments change firm-wide processes such as matter opening, so rollout depends on partner behaviour change and commonly slips.
Relativity
- Quote-only and expensive, typically billed on data volume, so costs escalate with matter size
- Complex enough that certified specialists are a job title, which is a real staffing cost
- Considerable overkill for small matters, where lighter self-service tools are far cheaper
Pricing, plan by plan
Intapp
On request- Intapp$undefined/year
- Modular licensing quoted per firm
- Risk, intake, time and DealCloud modules priced separately
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Relativity
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Relativity review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Intapp if
- You need conflicts and business intake.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want confidentiality walls.
Choose Relativity if
- You need large-scale processing.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want review workflow.
Questions people ask
- Is Intapp or Relativity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Intapp starts at On request and Relativity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Intapp or Relativity?
- Intapp starts at On request and Relativity at On request.
- Does Intapp or Relativity run on more platforms?
- Intapp runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. Relativity runs on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- What is Intapp best used for?
- Intapp is most often used for large firms formalising conflicts clearance and matter opening approvals, practices that must demonstrate confidentiality walls rather than assert them as policy, firms losing revenue to outside counsel guideline breaches caught only after invoicing, advisory and capital markets teams needing deal pipeline and relationship management. Of those, large firms formalising conflicts clearance and matter opening approvals and practices that must demonstrate confidentiality walls rather than assert them as policy are not what Relativity is typically brought in for.
- What can Intapp do that Relativity cannot?
- Intapp covers Conflicts and business intake, Confidentiality walls, Time capture, DealCloud. Relativity covers Large-scale processing, Review workflow, Analytics and active learning, Application ecosystem.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Intapp: Is Intapp a practice management system?
No. It covers risk, compliance, intake and time capture. Firms run it alongside a billing and matter financial system such as Aderant or Elite 3E.
Relativity: What does Relativity cost?
It does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally billed on data volume and users, quoted per matter or organisation.
Intapp: Can we check Intapp's financial position before committing?
Yes, which is unusual in this market. Intapp has been listed on Nasdaq since 2021, so revenue and retention figures appear in public filings rather than only in sales material.
Relativity: Is Relativity only for law firms?
No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.
Intapp: What size of firm is it for?
Large firms and advisory businesses with a formal risk function. Small practices handle conflicts inside their practice management system instead.
Relativity: Do I need trained staff?
In practice yes. Relativity certification is a recognised specialism, and that staffing cost is part of the total.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Intapp vs Clio
- Intapp vs Ironclad
- Intapp vs NetDocuments
- Intapp vs Lawmatics
- Intapp vs Aderant
- Intapp vs Smokeball
- Intapp vs Docketwise
- Intapp vs Luminance
- Intapp vs iManage
- Intapp vs Secure Privacy
- Intapp vs MyCase
- Intapp vs iubenda
- Intapp vs LexisNexis
- Intapp vs Actionstep
- Intapp vs DISCO
- Intapp vs Everlaw
- Intapp vs Logikcull
- Intapp vs Westlaw
- Intapp vs Harvey
- Intapp vs Litera
- Intapp vs Filevine
- Intapp vs CASEpeer
- Intapp vs Cookiebot
- Relativity vs Clio
- Relativity vs Ironclad
- Relativity vs NetDocuments
- Relativity vs Lawmatics
- Relativity vs Aderant
- Relativity vs Smokeball
- Relativity vs Docketwise
- Relativity vs Luminance
- Relativity vs iManage
- Relativity vs Secure Privacy
- Relativity vs MyCase
- Relativity vs iubenda
- Relativity vs LexisNexis
- Relativity vs Actionstep
- Relativity vs DISCO
- Relativity vs Everlaw
- Relativity vs Logikcull
- Relativity vs Westlaw
- Relativity vs Harvey
- Relativity vs Litera
- Relativity vs Filevine
- Relativity vs CASEpeer
- Relativity vs Cookiebot
