Construction · head to head
eSUB vs Sitemark

eSUB
Construction
Cloud-based mobile construction management platform
- From
- $49/month
- Rated
- -

Sitemark
Construction
Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: eSUB limited to commercial subcontractors; not suitable for general contractors or non-construction industries; Sitemark it only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- They diverge on capability: eSUB covers Mobile task management, Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which eSUB and Sitemark actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in eSUB
- Mobile task management
- Timesheet tracking
- Photo documentation
- Job costing
- Field notes
- QuickBooks
- Sage
- Procore
Only in Sitemark
- Construction progress tracking
- As-built versus design comparison
- Thermographic inspection
- Defect localisation
- Commissioning workflows
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
- Drone and robotics ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
eSUB
- Project management for commercial construction subcontractorsnot Sitemark
- Daily reports, RFIs, submittals and change orders from the fieldnot Sitemark
- Crew time capture on mobile devicesnot Sitemark
- Labour, job cost, equipment and material reportingnot Sitemark
- Centralised drawing and document managementnot Sitemark
Sitemark
- An EPC contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rowsnot eSUB
- An asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signingnot eSUB
- An operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the faultnot eSUB
- A developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement roundnot eSUB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
eSUB
- Limited to commercial subcontractors; not suitable for general contractors or non-construction industries
- Custom pricing with no transparent public pricing makes budget planning difficult for prospective customers
- Narrow candidate list with only one direct competitor (Procore) in the space
- May have smaller feature set compared to enterprise construction platforms
Sitemark
- It only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Pricing is quoted on site count and unpublished variables, which penalises owners of many small distributed assets relative to one operator of a single large plant with the same total capacity.
- You still need someone to fly the site, and Sitemark does not remove the drone operator cost, permits or airspace constraints; it monetises the data after the flight.
- Automated progress counting depends on a clean, current design layout, and on projects where the layout changes weekly the comparison generates false deviations that erode trust in the numbers.
- Thermographic defect detection needs the plant producing at sufficient irradiance, so inspection windows in northern latitudes are narrow and a missed window pushes findings into the next season.
Pricing, plan by plan
eSUB
$49/month- Starter$49/month
- Mobile task management
- Timesheet tracking
- Document management
- Professional$99/month
- Advanced scheduling
- Accounting integration
- Custom workflows
Sitemark
On request- Sitemark Construction$undefined/year
- Priced on number of sites and other variables
- Progress tracking across construction activities
- As-built versus design quality control
- Sitemark Operations$undefined/year
- Thermographic inspection and defect detection
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose eSUB if
- You need mobile task management.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want timesheet tracking.
Choose Sitemark if
- You need construction progress tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want as-built versus design comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is eSUB or Sitemark better?
- Neither clearly leads. eSUB starts at $49/month and Sitemark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, eSUB or Sitemark?
- eSUB starts at $49/month and Sitemark at On request.
- Does eSUB or Sitemark run on more platforms?
- eSUB runs on iOS, Android, Web. Sitemark runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is eSUB best used for?
- eSUB is most often used for project management for commercial construction subcontractors, daily reports, rfis, submittals and change orders from the field, crew time capture on mobile devices, labour, job cost, equipment and material reporting. Of those, project management for commercial construction subcontractors and daily reports, rfis, submittals and change orders from the field are not what Sitemark is typically brought in for.
- What can eSUB do that Sitemark cannot?
- eSUB covers Mobile task management, Timesheet tracking, Photo documentation, Job costing. Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking, As-built versus design comparison, Thermographic inspection, Defect localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
eSUB: What is eSUB designed for and who is the primary user?
eSUB is a mobile-first construction management platform built exclusively for commercial subcontractors. It connects the field to the office through mobile apps and web interfaces for creating, tracking, and managing documents and daily activities.
SourceSitemark: Is Sitemark priced per megawatt?
No. Sitemark states pricing is based on number of sites and other variables. Ask explicitly how a portfolio of small sites is treated, because per-site pricing is unkind to distributed assets.
eSUB: What key features does eSUB Cloud include?
eSUB includes submittals, change orders, RFIs, daily reports, mobile app functionality, email integration, field notes, time cards, project management, document management, time tracking, and job costing capabilities.
SourceSitemark: Do we have to use Sitemark drone pilots?
No. It accepts data from third-party drone operators, which lets you keep an existing flight contractor.
eSUB: Does eSUB offer a free trial?
Yes. eSUB offers a 14-day free trial as well as customized demos. The demo includes a 45-minute guided walkthrough in a staged demo project.
SourceSitemark: Does it cover anything other than solar?
No. It is built specifically around solar plant structures and defect types.
eSUB: How does eSUB pricing work?
eSUB Cloud pricing depends on user count and modules required; quotes are provided on a customized basis. No implementation fees apply for standard scopes, and no per-job charges are assessed. Updates are included in the subscription.
SourceSitemark: Can we export our data?
Yes, orthomosaics, defect lists and reports export. Confirm the format and whether historical inspections remain accessible after a subscription lapses.
eSUB: What platforms does eSUB support?
eSUB offers mobile apps for both iOS and Android, as well as a web interface. The platform is designed mobile-first with field-focused functionality.
SourceSitemark: Where is the company based?
Leuven, Belgium, with customers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the Americas.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- eSUB vs Procore
- eSUB vs Clearstory
- eSUB vs Document Crunch
- eSUB vs Siteline
- eSUB vs Kahua
- eSUB vs Egnyte
- eSUB vs Fieldwire
- eSUB vs Newforma
- eSUB vs Oracle Aconex
- eSUB vs Microsoft Project
- eSUB vs Smartsheet
- eSUB vs Raken
- eSUB vs Vectorworks Architect
- eSUB vs Viewpoint Vista
- eSUB vs PlanGrid
- eSUB vs Primavera P6
- eSUB vs Revit
- eSUB vs Reconstruct
- eSUB vs Dalux
- eSUB vs Buildots
- eSUB vs Propeller Aero
- eSUB vs Skydio Dock for X10
- eSUB vs B2W Estimate
- eSUB vs HCSS HeavyBid
- eSUB vs Buildertrend
- eSUB vs Adaptive
- eSUB vs GCPay
- eSUB vs HammerTech
- eSUB vs Handoff
- eSUB vs Houzz Pro
- Sitemark vs Procore
- Sitemark vs Clearstory
- Sitemark vs Document Crunch
- Sitemark vs Siteline
- Sitemark vs Kahua
- Sitemark vs Egnyte
- Sitemark vs Fieldwire
- Sitemark vs Newforma
- Sitemark vs Oracle Aconex
- Sitemark vs Microsoft Project
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet
- Sitemark vs Raken
- Sitemark vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sitemark vs Viewpoint Vista
- Sitemark vs PlanGrid
- Sitemark vs Primavera P6
- Sitemark vs Revit
- Sitemark vs Reconstruct
- Sitemark vs Dalux
- Sitemark vs Buildots
- Sitemark vs Propeller Aero
- Sitemark vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sitemark vs B2W Estimate
- Sitemark vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sitemark vs Buildertrend
- Sitemark vs Adaptive
- Sitemark vs GCPay
- Sitemark vs HammerTech
- Sitemark vs Handoff
- Sitemark vs Houzz Pro
