Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs VUEWorks

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

VUEWorks
Government
GIS-centred enterprise asset management for public agencies, built around Esri ArcGIS
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; VUEWorks the product assumes a maintained enterprise ArcGIS geodatabase; agencies without one face a spatial data cleanup project before VUEWorks does anything useful, and that project is usually quoted by the same consultancy selling the software.
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, VUEWorks covers Native Esri integration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and VUEWorks actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | VUEWorks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | quote |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Government |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in VUEWorks
- Native Esri integration
- Work orders and requests
- Inspections
- Condition and risk
- Capital planning
- Pavement management
- Mobile field access
- Dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot VUEWorks
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot VUEWorks
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot VUEWorks
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot VUEWorks
VUEWorks
- A county public works department that already runs Esri and wants work orders raised directly against map featuresnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A stormwater utility recording CCTV sewer inspection results against pipe segments for regulatory reportingnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A transport agency modelling pavement treatment strategies to defend a road resurfacing budgetnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A city consolidating sign, signal and streetlight inventories that currently live in separate spreadsheetsnot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
VUEWorks
- The product assumes a maintained enterprise ArcGIS geodatabase; agencies without one face a spatial data cleanup project before VUEWorks does anything useful, and that project is usually quoted by the same consultancy selling the software.
- No pricing is published and deals are typically bundled with consulting services, which makes it hard to separate the software cost from the data work when comparing bids.
- The interface is functional rather than modern, and field crews accustomed to consumer mobile apps often resist it, which undermines the data quality the capital planning depends on.
- The Esri dependency is also an Esri cost: agencies need current ArcGIS Enterprise or ArcGIS Online licensing, and that sits outside the VUEWorks quote entirely.
- It is a small vendor with a limited partner network and a mainly North American footprint, so support and implementation capacity outside that region is thin.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
VUEWorks
On request- VUEWorks Enterprise$undefined/year
- Quoted per agency by user count and modules
- Hosted or on-premise deployment options
- GIS integration, data migration and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose VUEWorks if
- You need native esri integration.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work orders and requests.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or VUEWorks better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and VUEWorks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or VUEWorks?
- ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and VUEWorks at On request.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or VUEWorks run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. VUEWorks runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what VUEWorks is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that VUEWorks cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. VUEWorks covers Native Esri integration, Work orders and requests, Inspections, Condition and risk.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
VUEWorks: Do we need Esri ArcGIS?
Effectively yes. The asset register is the GIS, and the ArcGIS licensing sits outside the VUEWorks quote.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
VUEWorks: Is pricing published?
No. VUEWorks is quoted per agency by users and modules, often bundled with data collection services.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
VUEWorks: Can it replace Cityworks?
It occupies the same GIS-centric municipal asset management space, so yes in principle, but migration means remapping workflows and history.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
VUEWorks: Is there a cloud option?
Yes, VUEWorks is offered hosted as well as on-premise.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs DataSF
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CityView
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs RecDesk
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs DemandStar
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bonfire
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs NEOGOV
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Springbrook Software
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OpenGov
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Legistar
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OnBase
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Polco
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs PublicInput
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Socrata
- VUEWorks vs QGIS
- VUEWorks vs SW Maps
- VUEWorks vs Felt
- VUEWorks vs CARTO
- VUEWorks vs Global Mapper
- VUEWorks vs GRASS GIS
- VUEWorks vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- VUEWorks vs Trailforks
- VUEWorks vs onX Maps
- VUEWorks vs Mapbox
- VUEWorks vs Google Maps Platform
- VUEWorks vs Leaflet
- VUEWorks vs Bing Maps
- VUEWorks vs Cesium ion
- VUEWorks vs Citymapper
- VUEWorks vs Gaia GPS
- VUEWorks vs GraphHopper
- VUEWorks vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- VUEWorks vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- VUEWorks vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- VUEWorks vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- VUEWorks vs DataSF
- VUEWorks vs CityView
- VUEWorks vs RecDesk
- VUEWorks vs DemandStar
- VUEWorks vs Bonfire
- VUEWorks vs NEOGOV
- VUEWorks vs Springbrook Software
- VUEWorks vs OpenGov
- VUEWorks vs Legistar
- VUEWorks vs OnBase
- VUEWorks vs Polco
- VUEWorks vs PublicInput
- VUEWorks vs Socrata
