Maps · head to head
onX Maps vs QGIS

onX Maps
Maps
Land ownership and offline navigation apps sold as separate subscriptions per activity: Hunt, Offroad, Backcountry
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
QGIS
Maps
Free, open-source desktop GIS application that supports viewing, editing, and analysis of
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: onX Maps hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.; QGIS requires technical knowledge to use effectively for advanced GIS analysis
- They diverge on capability: onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries, QGIS covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which onX Maps and QGIS actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in onX Maps
- Land ownership boundaries
- Offline maps
- Waypoint and track marking
- Elite tier private land data
- 3D terrain view
- Weather overlay
Only in QGIS
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
onX Maps
- A hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a propertynot QGIS
- An off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access datanot QGIS
- A backcountry skier or hiker wanting offline terrain maps without cell signalnot QGIS
- Someone who does two or more of these activities and needs to budget for two or three separate subscriptionsnot QGIS
QGIS
- Creating thematic maps showing population density by regionnot onX Maps
- Digitizing building footprints from satellite imagery for urban planningnot onX Maps
- Analyzing proximity of retail stores to competitor locationsnot onX Maps
- Performing spatial analysis of wildlife habitat suitabilitynot onX Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
onX Maps
- Hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.
- Elite-tier pricing at roughly $99.99 a year per product is expensive if a buyer only occasionally needs the private land ownership data it adds.
- The apps are US and Canada focused, with more limited usefulness for international travel compared to a global mapping product.
- Land ownership data, while extensive, can lag real-world changes in property boundaries in fast-changing areas.
- It is not a general-purpose hiking or trail-review app in the way AllTrails or Gaia GPS are, so casual hikers without a land-boundary need may find the focus narrower than expected.
QGIS
- Requires technical knowledge to use effectively for advanced GIS analysis
- Desktop application does not include built-in web publishing capabilities
Pricing, plan by plan
onX Maps
On request- onX Hunt Elite$99.99/year
- Nationwide private land ownership data
- Recent satellite imagery
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Premium$34.99/year
- Trail and land ownership maps for off-road use
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Elite$99.99/year
- Everything in Premium plus nationwide land ownership and recent imagery
- onX Backcountry$29.99/year
- Backcountry ski and hike focused maps
- Offline maps
- Avalanche and terrain data
QGIS
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the QGIS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose onX Maps if
- You need land ownership boundaries.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want offline maps.
Choose QGIS if
- You need core functionality.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is onX Maps or QGIS better?
- Neither clearly leads. onX Maps starts at On request and QGIS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, onX Maps or QGIS?
- onX Maps starts at On request and QGIS at On request.
- Does onX Maps or QGIS run on more platforms?
- onX Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. QGIS runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- What is onX Maps best used for?
- onX Maps is most often used for a hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a property, an off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access data, a backcountry skier or hiker wanting offline terrain maps without cell signal, someone who does two or more of these activities and needs to budget for two or three separate subscriptions. Of those, a hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a property and an off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access data are not what QGIS is typically brought in for.
- What can onX Maps do that QGIS cannot?
- onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries, Offline maps, Waypoint and track marking, Elite tier private land data. QGIS covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
onX Maps: Can I use one onX subscription for both hunting and off-roading?
No, onX Hunt, onX Offroad and onX Backcountry are separate apps with separate subscriptions.
QGIS: Is QGIS free and open source?
Yes. QGIS is free and open-source software, licensed under the GNU General Public License, available for download and modification by anyone.
SourceonX Maps: What does the Elite tier add?
Elite tiers add nationwide private land ownership data, more recent satellite imagery and partner discounts on top of the base Premium tier.
QGIS: What operating systems does QGIS support?
QGIS runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with installers available for each platform.
SourceonX Maps: Does onX work outside the US?
Coverage is strongest in the US and Canada; usefulness elsewhere is limited.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- onX Maps vs Gaia GPS
- onX Maps vs Trailforks
- onX Maps vs AllTrails
- onX Maps vs Ride with GPS
- onX Maps vs Google Maps
- onX Maps vs Citymapper
- onX Maps vs Felt
- onX Maps vs SW Maps
- onX Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- onX Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- onX Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- onX Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- onX Maps vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- onX Maps vs TomTom
- onX Maps vs Transit
- onX Maps vs Waze
- onX Maps vs What3words
- onX Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- onX Maps vs GRASS GIS
- onX Maps vs WhiteboxTools
- onX Maps vs Global Mapper
- onX Maps vs SAGA GIS
- onX Maps vs CesiumJS
- onX Maps vs Atlas.co
- onX Maps vs Emlid Studio
- onX Maps vs Mapbox
- onX Maps vs Leaflet
- onX Maps vs Potree
- onX Maps vs Foursquare Places API
- onX Maps vs Fused
- onX Maps vs Geoapify
- onX Maps vs Leica Infinity
- QGIS vs Gaia GPS
- QGIS vs Trailforks
- QGIS vs AllTrails
- QGIS vs Ride with GPS
- QGIS vs Google Maps
- QGIS vs Citymapper
- QGIS vs Felt
- QGIS vs SW Maps
- QGIS vs Geographic Calculator
- QGIS vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- QGIS vs ArcGIS Survey123
- QGIS vs Agisoft Metashape
- QGIS vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- QGIS vs TomTom
- QGIS vs Transit
- QGIS vs Waze
- QGIS vs What3words
- QGIS vs TomTom Developer Portal
- QGIS vs GRASS GIS
- QGIS vs WhiteboxTools
- QGIS vs Global Mapper
- QGIS vs SAGA GIS
- QGIS vs CesiumJS
- QGIS vs Atlas.co
- QGIS vs Emlid Studio
- QGIS vs Mapbox
- QGIS vs Leaflet
- QGIS vs Potree
- QGIS vs Foursquare Places API
- QGIS vs Fused
- QGIS vs Geoapify
- QGIS vs Leica Infinity
