Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs SonarQube

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No

SonarQube
Developer Tools
Code quality and code security for clean code, at every step
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only SonarQube has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; SonarQube advanced Security add-on uses custom pricing
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and SonarQube actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in SonarQube
Nothing recorded that Entrust Identity as a Service does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot SonarQube
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot SonarQube
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot SonarQube
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot SonarQube
SonarQube
- Code quality analysisnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Vulnerability detectionnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Security scanningnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Compliance reportingnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
SonarQube
- Advanced Security add-on uses custom pricing
- Only private project lines of code count toward limits
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
SonarQube
Free- FreeFree
- Supports up to 50000 lines of code in private projects
- Never expires
- Covers public projects
- Team$34/month
- 30+ languages
- Code quality standards
- Bug and vulnerability detection
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Advanced security reports
- OWASP/CWE/PCI DSS compliance
- Unlimited users and projects
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or SonarQube better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and SonarQube at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or SonarQube?
- SonarQube has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for SonarQube.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or SonarQube run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. SonarQube runs on Web.
- Can I use SonarQube for free?
- Yes. SonarQube has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what SonarQube is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that SonarQube cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
SonarQube: How much does SonarQube cost?
SonarQube offers a free tier supporting up to 50000 lines of code in private projects, a Team plan starting at $34/month, and custom Enterprise pricing. Team plan includes 14-day free trial.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
SonarQube: Is SonarQube free?
Yes, SonarQube offers a free tier that never expires and covers both public and private projects up to 50000 lines of code in private projects.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
SonarQube: What languages does SonarQube support?
SonarQube Team plan supports 30+ languages including common programming languages. Enterprise plan adds support for 40+ languages including ABAP, COBOL, and Apex.
SourceRelated pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ESLint
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs pnpm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Turborepo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cortex
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Harness
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Jitsu
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Steampipe
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Tilt
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Backstage
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ConfigCat
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cody
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Dagger
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Deep Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Deno
- SonarQube vs Cisco Duo
- SonarQube vs JumpCloud
- SonarQube vs Ping Identity
- SonarQube vs Frontegg
- SonarQube vs Authelia
- SonarQube vs Beyond Identity
- SonarQube vs Transmit Security
- SonarQube vs Akeyless
- SonarQube vs authentik
- SonarQube vs Logto
- SonarQube vs Speakeasy
- SonarQube vs Authy
- SonarQube vs ExpressVPN
- SonarQube vs Falco
- SonarQube vs Fenergo
- SonarQube vs Google Authenticator
- SonarQube vs Grype
- SonarQube vs Hanwha Vision
- SonarQube vs Visual Studio Code
- SonarQube vs ESLint
- SonarQube vs pnpm
- SonarQube vs Turborepo
- SonarQube vs Cortex
- SonarQube vs Harness
- SonarQube vs Jitsu
- SonarQube vs Steampipe
- SonarQube vs Tilt
- SonarQube vs Backstage
- SonarQube vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- SonarQube vs ConfigCat
- SonarQube vs Cody
- SonarQube vs Dagger
- SonarQube vs Deep Code
- SonarQube vs Deno
