Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs RubyMine

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No

RubyMine
Developer Tools
JetBrains IDE for Ruby and Ruby on Rails development
- From
- $24/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; RubyMine no permanently free tier for commercial use; requires an ongoing subscription.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, RubyMine covers Rails-aware coding assistance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and RubyMine actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | RubyMine |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | $24/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | windows, mac, linux |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2000 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in RubyMine
- Rails-aware coding assistance
- Integrated debugger
- Test runner integration
- Database tools
- Version control integration
- Docker support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot RubyMine
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot RubyMine
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot RubyMine
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot RubyMine
RubyMine
- Building and maintaining Ruby on Rails applicationsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Debugging Ruby web applicationsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Running and managing RSpec or Minitest suitesnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Working across Ruby, JavaScript, and SQL in one projectnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
RubyMine
- No permanently free tier for commercial use; requires an ongoing subscription.
- More resource-intensive than lightweight editors such as Sublime Text.
- Focused primarily on Ruby, so polyglot teams may prefer IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate with plugins instead.
- Startup time can be slower than simpler text editors on older hardware.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
RubyMine
$24/month- Individual$24/month
- Personal use license
- Access to RubyMine
- Free for students and open-source maintainers
- Organization$34/month
- Business use license
- Access to RubyMine
- Volume and renewal discounts
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose RubyMine if
- You need rails-aware coding assistance.
- You work on windows, mac, linux.
- You also want integrated debugger.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or RubyMine better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and RubyMine at $24/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or RubyMine?
- Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and RubyMine at $24/month.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or RubyMine run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. RubyMine runs on windows, mac, linux.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what RubyMine is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that RubyMine cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. RubyMine covers Rails-aware coding assistance, Integrated debugger, Test runner integration, Database tools.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
RubyMine: How much does RubyMine cost?
RubyMine is sold as a JetBrains Toolbox subscription starting around $24/month for individuals and $34/month for organizations, with free licenses available for students and open-source maintainers.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
RubyMine: Is there a free trial?
JetBrains provides a free trial period for RubyMine so developers can evaluate it before purchasing a subscription.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
RubyMine: What platforms does RubyMine support?
RubyMine runs as a desktop application on Windows, macOS, and Linux via JetBrains Toolbox.
SourceRelated pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sweep
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Eclipse IDE
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Namespace
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GNU Emacs
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bazel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Earthly
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Harness
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Coder
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Garden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cody
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frappe
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Git
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hookdeck
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JFrog Artifactory
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nix
- RubyMine vs Cisco Duo
- RubyMine vs JumpCloud
- RubyMine vs Ping Identity
- RubyMine vs Frontegg
- RubyMine vs Authelia
- RubyMine vs Beyond Identity
- RubyMine vs Transmit Security
- RubyMine vs Akeyless
- RubyMine vs authentik
- RubyMine vs Logto
- RubyMine vs Speakeasy
- RubyMine vs Authy
- RubyMine vs ExpressVPN
- RubyMine vs Falco
- RubyMine vs Fenergo
- RubyMine vs Google Authenticator
- RubyMine vs Grype
- RubyMine vs Hanwha Vision
- RubyMine vs Visual Studio Code
- RubyMine vs Sweep
- RubyMine vs Eclipse IDE
- RubyMine vs Namespace
- RubyMine vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- RubyMine vs GNU Emacs
- RubyMine vs Bazel
- RubyMine vs Earthly
- RubyMine vs Harness
- RubyMine vs Coder
- RubyMine vs Garden
- RubyMine vs Cody
- RubyMine vs Frappe
- RubyMine vs Git
- RubyMine vs Hookdeck
- RubyMine vs JFrog Artifactory
- RubyMine vs Nix
