Softwr

Software · head to head

FRISS vs Policyholders

FRISS logo

FRISS

Software

Trust automation for insurance

From
On request
Rated
-
P

Policyholders

Software

Insurance platform for brokers and agents

From
$99/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • They diverge on capability: FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, Policyholders covers Policy management.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FRISS and Policyholders actually diverge.

Attributes where FRISS and Policyholders differ
AttributeFRISSPolicyholders
Starting priceOn request$99/month
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, Ios, Android
Founded20062010

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FRISS

  • Underwriting risk scoring
  • Claims fraud detection
  • Network analysis
  • Real-time decisioning
  • Third-party data enrichment
  • Case management
  • Predictive analytics
  • Compliance monitoring

Only in Policyholders

  • Policy management
  • Client management
  • Commission tracking
  • Document storage
  • Task management
  • Calendar integration
  • Reporting and analytics
  • Mobile app

Both cover

  • SOC2
  • Cloud deployment
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FRISS

  • Fraud detectionnot Policyholders
  • Risk assessmentnot Policyholders
  • Underwriting automationnot Policyholders
  • Claims investigationnot Policyholders
  • Compliancenot Policyholders

Policyholders

  • Policy administrationnot FRISS
  • Client managementnot FRISS
  • Commission trackingnot FRISS
  • Agency operationsnot FRISS

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FRISS

  • FRISS's homepage confirms the insurance fraud-detection product but every pricing action is a 'contact sales' prompt, with no edition names or figures published anywhere on the site

Policyholders

Nothing recorded yet. See the Policyholders review.

Pricing, plan by plan

FRISS

On request
  • Underwriting$undefined/year
    • Risk scoring
    • Application fraud detection
    • Real-time assessment
  • Claims$undefined/year
    • Claims fraud detection
    • Network analysis
    • Investigation prioritization
  • Enterprise Platform$undefined/year
    • All modules
    • Custom models
    • Advanced analytics

Policyholders

$99/month
  • Starter$99/month
    • Policy management
    • Client tracking
    • Basic reporting
  • Professional$299/month
    • All Starter features
    • Commission tracking
    • Advanced analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose FRISS if

  • You need underwriting risk scoring.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want claims fraud detection.

Choose Policyholders if

  • You need policy management.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want client management.

Questions people ask

Is FRISS or Policyholders better?
Neither clearly leads. FRISS starts at On request and Policyholders at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FRISS or Policyholders?
FRISS starts at On request and Policyholders at $99/month.
Does FRISS or Policyholders run on more platforms?
FRISS runs on Web, Api. Policyholders runs on Web, Ios, Android.
What is FRISS best used for?
FRISS is most often used for fraud detection, risk assessment, underwriting automation, claims investigation. Of those, fraud detection and risk assessment are not what Policyholders is typically brought in for.
What can FRISS do that Policyholders cannot?
FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, Claims fraud detection, Network analysis, Real-time decisioning. Policyholders covers Policy management, Client management, Commission tracking, Document storage. Both handle SOC2, Cloud deployment, Web support.

Related pages

Other head to heads