Insurance · head to head
FRISS vs Policyholders
Policyholders
Insurance
Insurance platform for brokers and agents
- From
- $99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- They diverge on capability: FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, Policyholders covers Policy management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FRISS and Policyholders actually diverge.
| Attribute | FRISS | Policyholders |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $99/month |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Ios, Android |
| Founded | 2006 | 2010 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FRISS
- Underwriting risk scoring
- Claims fraud detection
- Network analysis
- Real-time decisioning
- Third-party data enrichment
- Case management
- Predictive analytics
- Compliance monitoring
Only in Policyholders
- Policy management
- Client management
- Commission tracking
- Document storage
- Task management
- Calendar integration
- Reporting and analytics
- Mobile app
Both cover
- SOC2
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FRISS
- Fraud detectionnot Policyholders
- Risk assessmentnot Policyholders
- Underwriting automationnot Policyholders
- Claims investigationnot Policyholders
- Compliancenot Policyholders
Policyholders
- Policy administrationnot FRISS
- Client managementnot FRISS
- Commission trackingnot FRISS
- Agency operationsnot FRISS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FRISS
- No pricing plans, tiers, or costs are published on the website
- Requires direct contact through 'Let's talk' call-to-action for pricing inquiries
Policyholders
Nothing recorded yet. See the Policyholders review.
Pricing, plan by plan
FRISS
On request- Underwriting$undefined/year
- Risk scoring
- Application fraud detection
- Real-time assessment
- Claims$undefined/year
- Claims fraud detection
- Network analysis
- Investigation prioritization
- Enterprise Platform$undefined/year
- All modules
- Custom models
- Advanced analytics
Policyholders
$99/month- Starter$99/month
- Policy management
- Client tracking
- Basic reporting
- Professional$299/month
- All Starter features
- Commission tracking
- Advanced analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose FRISS if
- You need underwriting risk scoring.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want claims fraud detection.
Choose Policyholders if
- You need policy management.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want client management.
Questions people ask
- Is FRISS or Policyholders better?
- Neither clearly leads. FRISS starts at On request and Policyholders at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FRISS or Policyholders?
- FRISS starts at On request and Policyholders at $99/month.
- Does FRISS or Policyholders run on more platforms?
- FRISS runs on Web, Api. Policyholders runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is FRISS best used for?
- FRISS is most often used for fraud detection, risk assessment, underwriting automation, claims investigation. Of those, fraud detection and risk assessment are not what Policyholders is typically brought in for.
- What can FRISS do that Policyholders cannot?
- FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, Claims fraud detection, Network analysis, Real-time decisioning. Policyholders covers Policy management, Client management, Commission tracking, Document storage. Both handle SOC2, Cloud deployment, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FRISS: How does FRISS publish pricing information?
FRISS does not publicly disclose pricing on their website. The company directs interested parties to contact their sales team directly for pricing and licensing details.
SourceFRISS: What pricing model does FRISS use?
FRISS does not specify their pricing model on publicly available pages, requiring direct contact with their sales team to discuss pricing structure and implementation costs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Policyholders
Other head to heads
- FRISS vs Duck Creek Policy
- FRISS vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- FRISS vs Duck Creek
- FRISS vs Shift Technology
- FRISS vs Snapsheet Claims
- FRISS vs Origami Risk
- FRISS vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- FRISS vs Applied Epic
- FRISS vs Tarmika
- FRISS vs Insurity Suite
- FRISS vs Splice Software
- FRISS vs TurboRater
- FRISS vs Verisk
- FRISS vs Vertafore Content
- FRISS vs AgencyBloc
- FRISS vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- FRISS vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- FRISS vs EZLynx
- FRISS vs HawkSoft
- FRISS vs Vertafore AMS360
- FRISS vs Bold Penguin
- FRISS vs Indio
- FRISS vs Haven Life
- FRISS vs Hippo
- FRISS vs INSTANDA
- FRISS vs InsurancePro
- Policyholders vs Duck Creek Policy
- Policyholders vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Policyholders vs Duck Creek
- Policyholders vs Shift Technology
- Policyholders vs Snapsheet Claims
- Policyholders vs Origami Risk
- Policyholders vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Policyholders vs Applied Epic
- Policyholders vs Tarmika
- Policyholders vs Insurity Suite
- Policyholders vs Splice Software
- Policyholders vs TurboRater
- Policyholders vs Verisk
- Policyholders vs Vertafore Content
- Policyholders vs AgencyBloc
- Policyholders vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Policyholders vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Policyholders vs EZLynx
- Policyholders vs HawkSoft
- Policyholders vs Vertafore AMS360
- Policyholders vs Bold Penguin
- Policyholders vs Indio
- Policyholders vs Haven Life
- Policyholders vs Hippo
- Policyholders vs INSTANDA
- Policyholders vs InsurancePro

