Duck Creek Policy vs Policyholders

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Both are used for policy administration, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Pricing, plan by plan

Which should you pick?

Questions people ask

Is Duck Creek Policy or Policyholders better?

Neither clearly leads. Duck Creek Policy starts at On request and Policyholders at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Duck Creek Policy or Policyholders?

Duck Creek Policy starts at On request and Policyholders at $99/month.

Does Duck Creek Policy or Policyholders run on more platforms?

Duck Creek Policy runs on Web. Policyholders runs on Web, Ios, Android.

What is Duck Creek Policy best used for?

Duck Creek Policy is most often used for policy administration, underwriting workflows, rating and pricing, claims management. Of those, underwriting workflows and rating and pricing are not what Policyholders is typically brought in for.

What can Duck Creek Policy do that Policyholders cannot?

Duck Creek Policy covers Policy lifecycle management, Product configuration, Rating engine, Underwriting workbench. Policyholders covers Policy management, Client management, Commission tracking, Document storage. Both handle SOC2, Cloud deployment, Web support.