Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Bolt Solutions vs EIS Group

Bolt Solutions logo

Bolt Solutions

Insurance

Commercial insurance distribution platform

From
On request
Rated
-
EIS Group logo

EIS Group

Insurance

Coretech platform for insurers, strongest in group and voluntary benefits

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bolt Solutions no transparent pricing published on vendor website; EIS Group implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • They diverge on capability: Bolt Solutions covers Commercial quoting, EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bolt Solutions and EIS Group actually diverge.

Attributes where Bolt Solutions and EIS Group differ
AttributeBolt SolutionsEIS Group
Pricing modeltransactionquote
Founded2007Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bolt Solutions

  • Commercial quoting
  • Multi-carrier marketplace
  • Instant binding
  • Policy issuance
  • Agent portal
  • Carrier connectivity
  • Document generation
  • Analytics dashboard

Only in EIS Group

  • Group and voluntary benefits
  • OneSuite core applications
  • Open API layer
  • Cloud-native deployment
  • Multi-line support
  • Digital engagement

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bolt Solutions

  • Commercial quotingnot EIS Group
  • Small business insurancenot EIS Group
  • BOP policiesnot EIS Group
  • Workers compnot EIS Group
  • Multi-carrier accessnot EIS Group

EIS Group

  • A carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modellingnot Bolt Solutions
  • A multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendornot Bolt Solutions
  • A mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud accountnot Bolt Solutions
  • An insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suitenot Bolt Solutions

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bolt Solutions

  • No transparent pricing published on vendor website

EIS Group

  • Implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • The name recognition gap against Guidewire and Duck Creek means your reinsurers, auditors and incoming executives will ask you to justify the choice repeatedly over the life of the system.
  • Benefits strength does not transfer to personal lines, where you are comparing on general capability and the incumbents have more comparable references.
  • The microservices architecture that makes the platform flexible also raises the operational bar; carriers without a mature platform engineering function end up paying the vendor or an integrator to run it.
  • Licence costs are quoted per programme and scale with premium or policy volume, so a book that grows faster than forecast produces a renewal conversation you have little leverage in.

Pricing, plan by plan

Bolt Solutions

On request
  • Agent Portal$undefined/month
    • Commercial quoting
    • Multi-carrier access
    • Policy binding
  • Enterprise$undefined/custom
    • All Agent features
    • API access
    • White-label options

EIS Group

On request
  • EIS OneSuite$undefined/year
    • Policy, billing, claims and customer applications
    • Cloud deployment
    • API access

Which should you pick?

Choose Bolt Solutions if

  • You need commercial quoting.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want multi-carrier marketplace.

Choose EIS Group if

  • You need group and voluntary benefits.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want onesuite core applications.

Questions people ask

Is Bolt Solutions or EIS Group better?
Neither clearly leads. Bolt Solutions starts at On request and EIS Group at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bolt Solutions or EIS Group?
Bolt Solutions starts at On request and EIS Group at On request.
Does Bolt Solutions or EIS Group run on more platforms?
Bolt Solutions runs on Web, Api. EIS Group runs on Web, API.
What is Bolt Solutions best used for?
Bolt Solutions is most often used for commercial quoting, small business insurance, bop policies, workers comp. Of those, commercial quoting and small business insurance are not what EIS Group is typically brought in for.
What can Bolt Solutions do that EIS Group cannot?
Bolt Solutions covers Commercial quoting, Multi-carrier marketplace, Instant binding, Policy issuance. EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, OneSuite core applications, Open API layer, Cloud-native deployment.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Bolt Solutions: Does Bolt offer a free trial or free tier?

No information about free trial or free options is published on the pricing page. You must contact Bolt's sales team to request a demo or trial.

Source
EIS Group: Who is EIS actually best for?

Carriers writing group or voluntary benefits, where the alternative is heavy customisation of a property and casualty platform that was never designed to model an employer group.

EIS Group: Can it run in our own cloud account?

Yes. It is container-based and is deployed in customer-controlled cloud tenancies as well as the vendor cloud, which matters for carriers with data residency obligations.

EIS Group: How much of the outcome depends on the integrator?

Most of it. Budget for the delivery partner as the larger line item and check references for the specific practice team, not the firm.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads