Manufacturing · head to head
Autodesk Netfabb vs Duro PLM

Autodesk Netfabb
Manufacturing
Additive manufacturing build preparation and simulation, now sold only bundled with Fusion
- From
- $4415/year
- Rated
- -

Duro PLM
Manufacturing
Hosted PLM for hardware startups, sold in fixed user bands with no published price
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Autodesk Netfabb netfabb Ultimate has been retired outright, with no 2026 release and no renewals, so anyone who bought Ultimate is frozen on the 2025.1 build and must accept the repackaged Netfabb instead.; Duro PLM no pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.
- They diverge on capability: Autodesk Netfabb covers Mesh repair, Duro PLM covers Part library.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Autodesk Netfabb and Duro PLM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Autodesk Netfabb | Duro PLM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $4415/year | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, Desktop | Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Autodesk Netfabb
- Mesh repair
- Build orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build simulation
- Geometry compensation
- Lattice and shell structures
- Machine library
- Fusion bundle
Only in Duro PLM
- Part library
- Multi-level BOMs
- Change orders
- CAD integrations
- Supplier and cost data
- User band plans
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Autodesk Netfabb
- A metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine timenot Duro PLM
- An aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial buildsnot Duro PLM
- A production department nesting hundreds of small parts into a single polymer build to raise volume utilisationnot Duro PLM
- An engineering team that already subscribes to Fusion and wants AM preparation without adding a second vendornot Duro PLM
Duro PLM
- A robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturernot Autodesk Netfabb
- A consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the BOMnot Autodesk Netfabb
- A hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's BOM spreadsheet versionsnot Autodesk Netfabb
- A venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production buildnot Autodesk Netfabb
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Autodesk Netfabb
- Netfabb Ultimate has been retired outright, with no 2026 release and no renewals, so anyone who bought Ultimate is frozen on the 2025.1 build and must accept the repackaged Netfabb instead.
- Autodesk has ended development of the Selective Space Structures, Optimization Utility and Lattice Topology utilities, which removes capability some customers specifically bought the product for.
- It is now only sold bundled as Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb, so a shop that has standardised on other CAD pays for Fusion entitlements it will not use.
- At around 4,415 US dollars per seat per year it is far above slicer-class tools, and the pricing is per named user with no floating option in the standard subscription, which hurts teams where the AM engineer role is shared.
- Machine coverage is broad but not universal, and the newest printers from smaller manufacturers often reach their vendor own preparation software long before a Netfabb profile appears.
Duro PLM
- No pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.
- Plans are sold in fixed user bands rather than per seat, so hiring an eleventh engineer moves you to the next tier instead of adding one seat.
- Storage allowances are capped at 25, 50 and 100 GB, which is tight for teams keeping native CAD files rather than only neutral formats.
- There is no self-hosted or on-premises option, which rules Duro out for defence and some aerospace suppliers with data residency or ITAR handling constraints.
- Scope stops at engineering data: no requirements management, no quality module and no manufacturing process planning, so it does not replace the systems a company needs at production scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Autodesk Netfabb
$4415/year- Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb$4415/year
- Single-user subscription
- Netfabb build preparation, formerly Premium
- Selected functionality from the retired Ultimate edition
- Netfabb Simulation$undefined/year
- Metal powder bed build simulation
- Quoted through Autodesk sales, no published price
Duro PLM
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Up to 10 users
- 25 GB data storage
- Part library, BOMs and change orders
- Business$undefined/year
- Up to 20 users
- 50 GB data storage
- CAD integrations
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 20 or more users
- 100 GB data storage
- Extended support
Which should you pick?
Choose Autodesk Netfabb if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows, Desktop.
- You also want build orientation and nesting.
Questions people ask
- Is Autodesk Netfabb or Duro PLM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Autodesk Netfabb starts at $4415/year and Duro PLM at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Autodesk Netfabb or Duro PLM?
- Autodesk Netfabb starts at $4415/year and Duro PLM at On request.
- Does Autodesk Netfabb or Duro PLM run on more platforms?
- Autodesk Netfabb runs on Windows, Desktop. Duro PLM runs on Web.
- What is Autodesk Netfabb best used for?
- Autodesk Netfabb is most often used for a metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine time, an aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial builds, a production department nesting hundreds of small parts into a single polymer build to raise volume utilisation, an engineering team that already subscribes to fusion and wants am preparation without adding a second vendor. Of those, a metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine time and an aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial builds are not what Duro PLM is typically brought in for.
- What can Autodesk Netfabb do that Duro PLM cannot?
- Autodesk Netfabb covers Mesh repair, Build orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build simulation. Duro PLM covers Part library, Multi-level BOMs, Change orders, CAD integrations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Autodesk Netfabb: Is Netfabb discontinued?
No, but Netfabb Ultimate is. There is a 2026 release of Netfabb, sold only as Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb. Ultimate licences cannot be renewed.
Duro PLM: How much does Duro cost?
Duro does not publish prices. Plans are fixed annual subscriptions quoted by sales against a user band, billed Net 30.
Autodesk Netfabb: What does it cost?
The Fusion with Netfabb single-user subscription is listed at roughly 4,415 US dollars a year. Netfabb Simulation is quoted separately.
Duro PLM: Can I run Duro on my own servers?
No. It is cloud only, which is a hard blocker for organisations with data residency or export control requirements.
Autodesk Netfabb: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Autodesk sells subscription only across its product range.
Duro PLM: What happens when we exceed our user band?
You move to the next tier rather than adding individual seats, so growth arrives as a step change in cost.
Autodesk Netfabb: Do I need Fusion to use it?
You do not have to use Fusion, but you now pay for it, because the bundle is the only way Netfabb is sold.
Duro PLM: Is Duro suitable for medical device work?
Its change control is real but the workflow configuration and audit depth are lighter than dedicated regulated-industry PLM, so most ISO 13485 programmes need more.
Related pages
More on Autodesk Netfabb
Other head to heads
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Materialise Magics
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Oqton
- Autodesk Netfabb vs GrabCAD Print
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Simplify3D
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Formlabs PreForm
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Markforged Eiger
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Dyndrite
- Autodesk Netfabb vs 3YOURMIND
- Autodesk Netfabb vs AMFG
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Authentise
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Protolabs
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Fictiv
- Autodesk Netfabb vs ABB 800xA
- Autodesk Netfabb vs AVEVA System Platform
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Hippo CMMS
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Fusion 360
- Autodesk Netfabb vs PTC Windchill
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Aras Innovator
- Autodesk Netfabb vs OpenBOM
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Propel
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Augury
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Autodesk Netfabb vs KCF Technologies
- Autodesk Netfabb vs MOVUS
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Sight Machine
- Autodesk Netfabb vs TrakSYS
- Autodesk Netfabb vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Arena PLM
- Duro PLM vs Materialise Magics
- Duro PLM vs Oqton
- Duro PLM vs GrabCAD Print
- Duro PLM vs Simplify3D
- Duro PLM vs Formlabs PreForm
- Duro PLM vs Markforged Eiger
- Duro PLM vs Dyndrite
- Duro PLM vs 3YOURMIND
- Duro PLM vs AMFG
- Duro PLM vs Authentise
- Duro PLM vs Protolabs
- Duro PLM vs Fictiv
- Duro PLM vs ABB 800xA
- Duro PLM vs AVEVA System Platform
- Duro PLM vs Hippo CMMS
- Duro PLM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Duro PLM vs Fusion 360
- Duro PLM vs PTC Windchill
- Duro PLM vs Aras Innovator
- Duro PLM vs OpenBOM
- Duro PLM vs Propel
- Duro PLM vs Augury
- Duro PLM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Duro PLM vs KCF Technologies
- Duro PLM vs MOVUS
- Duro PLM vs Sight Machine
- Duro PLM vs TrakSYS
- Duro PLM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Duro PLM vs Arena PLM
