Developer Tools · head to head
Sweep vs Very Good Security

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Sweep has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sweep limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: Sweep covers Autocomplete, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sweep and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sweep | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | Freemium with paid tiers | Per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | JetBrains IDEs | Web, API |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2023 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sweep
- Autocomplete
- AI Agent
- Full codebase indexing
- Code review functionality
- Multi-IDE support
- GitHub integration
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sweep
- Accelerating code completion for JetBrains developersnot Very Good Security
- Automating refactoring tasks across codebasesnot Very Good Security
- Handling bug fixes with full repository contextnot Very Good Security
- Code review and quality assurancenot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Sweep
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Sweep
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Sweep
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Sweep
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sweep
- Limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- Free tier limited to 1,000 autocompletes per month
- API credit consumption varies by feature usage
- Performance dependent on codebase size and indexing quality
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sweep
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 autocompletes
- 5 USD API credits included
- All JetBrains IDEs supported
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Higher API credit allocation
- Priority support
- Ultra$60/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Maximum API credit allocation
- Extended context window
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Sweep if
- You need autocomplete.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JetBrains IDEs.
- You also want ai agent.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Sweep or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sweep starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sweep or Very Good Security?
- Sweep has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Sweep and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
- Does Sweep or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Sweep runs on JetBrains IDEs. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Sweep for free?
- Yes. Sweep has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
- What is Sweep best used for?
- Sweep is most often used for accelerating code completion for jetbrains developers, automating refactoring tasks across codebases, handling bug fixes with full repository context, code review and quality assurance. Of those, accelerating code completion for jetbrains developers and automating refactoring tasks across codebases are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Sweep do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Sweep covers Autocomplete, AI Agent, Full codebase indexing, Code review functionality. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sweep: What programming languages does Sweep support?
Sweep works with all programming languages supported by JetBrains IDEs, including Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, Kotlin, C++, and many others.
SourceVery Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Sweep: Does Sweep retain my code data?
No. Sweep is SOC 2 Type II certified with zero data retention. Code is processed for suggestions but not stored.
SourceVery Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Sweep: Can I cancel my Sweep subscription anytime?
Yes. You can cancel your subscription at any time from your account settings with no long-term commitments or cancellation fees.
SourceVery Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Sweep vs GitHub Copilot
- Sweep vs Refact
- Sweep vs PhpStorm
- Sweep vs JetBrains Rider
- Sweep vs Pieces for Developers
- Sweep vs Cody
- Sweep vs Deep Code
- Sweep vs Pants Build
- Sweep vs Fig
- Sweep vs Namespace
- Sweep vs Nix
- Sweep vs Nixpacks
- Sweep vs Octopus Deploy
- Sweep vs Okteto
- Sweep vs OpsLevel
- Sweep vs RubyMine
- Sweep vs Sourcegraph
- Sweep vs GoLand
- Sweep vs Baffle
- Sweep vs HashiCorp Vault
- Sweep vs Feedzai
- Sweep vs Securiti
- Sweep vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sweep vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Sweep vs LastPass
- Sweep vs DataGrail
- Sweep vs 1Password
- Sweep vs Transcend
- Sweep vs Doppler
- Sweep vs Tuta
- Sweep vs Delinea
- Sweep vs Envysion
- Sweep vs Frontegg
- Sweep vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs GitHub Copilot
- Very Good Security vs Refact
- Very Good Security vs PhpStorm
- Very Good Security vs JetBrains Rider
- Very Good Security vs Pieces for Developers
- Very Good Security vs Cody
- Very Good Security vs Deep Code
- Very Good Security vs Pants Build
- Very Good Security vs Fig
- Very Good Security vs Namespace
- Very Good Security vs Nix
- Very Good Security vs Nixpacks
- Very Good Security vs Octopus Deploy
- Very Good Security vs Okteto
- Very Good Security vs OpsLevel
- Very Good Security vs RubyMine
- Very Good Security vs Sourcegraph
- Very Good Security vs GoLand
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary

