Business Intelligence · head to head
Cube vs Umami

Cube
Business Intelligence
AI-native analytics platform with semantic layer and governed access
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Umami
Marketing
Open source, cookie-free web analytics you can self-host for the cost of a database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cube per-developer licensing can be expensive for large analytics teams; Umami there is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- They diverge on capability: Cube covers Analytics Chat, Umami covers Cookie-free tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cube and Umami actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cube
- Analytics Chat
- Workbooks
- Dashboards
- Embedded Analytics
- AI Integrations
- Core Data APIs
- Caching and pre-aggregations
Only in Umami
- Cookie-free tracking
- Self-hosting
- Small tracking script
- Custom events
- Funnels and goals
- Multi-site and teams
- Public dashboards
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cube
- Building governed semantic data models for analyticsnot Umami
- Embedding analytics into customer-facing productsnot Umami
- Enabling natural language data queries for teamsnot Umami
- Creating conversational dashboards with AI assistancenot Umami
Umami
- A developer who wants traffic numbers on a personal or client site without adding a consent bannernot Cube
- An organisation whose legal or procurement team has ruled out sending visitor data to a US advertising companynot Cube
- A high-traffic site where hosted analytics priced by pageview band has become expensive and self-hosting removes the ceiling entirelynot Cube
- A team that wants analytics data in a database they already control so they can query and join it themselvesnot Cube
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cube
- Per-developer licensing can be expensive for large analytics teams
- Additional cost for Explorer and Viewer roles beyond developers
- Semantic layer approach requires upfront modeling investment
- Smaller connector ecosystem than dedicated BI platforms
- May be overengineered for simple reporting needs
Umami
- There is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Self-hosting is only free in licence terms; you own the database, the upgrades, the backups and the query performance at scale, and a busy site's events table grows quickly enough to need real attention.
- Because it stores no persistent identifier, it cannot follow a user across devices or sessions in any meaningful way, which makes returning-visitor and lifetime-value questions unanswerable by design rather than by omission.
- Cloud overage is billed per event beyond the plan allowance, so a traffic spike or a badly instrumented custom event can produce a bill materially above the $20 or $200 headline before anyone notices.
- It is maintained by a small team, so the pace of new capability is modest and enterprise expectations such as SSO, granular role permissions and formal support agreements are limited compared with commercial analytics vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cube
Free- FreeFree
- For hobbyists and personal projects
- Basic data source connection
- Semantic modeling
- Starter$40/developer/month
- Extended agent limits
- Premium LLMs
- Unlimited workbooks
- Premium$80/developer/month
- All Starter features
- Embedded dashboards
- Embedded analytics chat
- Enterprise$null/custom
- 99.990% uptime SLA
- Dedicated single-tenant installation
- Bring Your Own Cloud
Umami
Free- Self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- No event limit imposed by the software
- Unlimited websites and users
- Cloud HobbyFree
- Up to 100,000 events per month
- 3 websites
- 6 months data retention
- Cloud Pro$20/month
- Up to 1,000,000 events per month
- Unlimited websites
- Unlimited team members
- Cloud Business$200/month
- Up to 10,000,000 events per month
- All Pro features
- Higher volume overage rate
Which should you pick?
Choose Cube if
- You need analytics chat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want workbooks.
Choose Umami if
- You need cookie-free tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want self-hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is Cube or Umami better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cube starts at Free and Umami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cube or Umami?
- Cube starts at Free and Umami at Free.
- Does Cube or Umami run on more platforms?
- Cube runs on Cloud, Self-hosted. Umami runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Cube for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cube best used for?
- Cube is most often used for building governed semantic data models for analytics, embedding analytics into customer-facing products, enabling natural language data queries for teams, creating conversational dashboards with ai assistance. Of those, building governed semantic data models for analytics and embedding analytics into customer-facing products are not what Umami is typically brought in for.
- What can Cube do that Umami cannot?
- Cube covers Analytics Chat, Workbooks, Dashboards, Embedded Analytics. Umami covers Cookie-free tracking, Self-hosting, Small tracking script, Custom events.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cube: What is the cost per developer on Cube?
Starter plan costs $40/developer/month. Premium adds embedded analytics at $80/developer/month. Explorer and Viewer roles cost $40 and $20/month respectively.
SourceUmami: Is Umami really free?
Self-hosted, yes; it is MIT licensed with no event cap. You pay for the server and database. Umami Cloud has a free tier at 100,000 events a month and paid tiers from $20.
Cube: What uptime SLAs does Cube offer?
Premium plan offers 99.950% uptime SLA. Enterprise plan provides 99.990% uptime SLA with dedicated support.
SourceUmami: Do I need a cookie consent banner?
For Umami analytics specifically, generally no, because it sets no cookies and stores no personal data. Other tags on your site may still require one.
Cube: Can I use Cube for free?
Yes, the Free plan includes basic data source connection, semantic modeling, workbooks, and dashboards for hobbyists and personal projects.
SourceUmami: Can it replace Google Analytics?
For traffic, referrers and event counts, yes. For attribution modelling, audiences and advertising integration, no.
Umami: What does it need to run?
A container and a PostgreSQL or MySQL database. Most people deploy it on infrastructure they already pay for.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cube vs Evidence
- Cube vs Zenlytic
- Cube vs Sisense
- Cube vs GoodData
- Cube vs Logi Analytics
- Cube vs Dundas BI
- Cube vs Fabi
- Cube vs Yellowfin
- Cube vs ThoughtSpot
- Cube vs Jedox
- Cube vs Pigment
- Cube vs MicroStrategy
- Cube vs ProfitWell
- Cube vs Quantum Metric
- Cube vs Quid
- Cube vs Reportz
- Cube vs Rill Data
- Cube vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Cube vs Matomo
- Cube vs Plausible
- Cube vs Fathom Analytics
- Cube vs Mautic
- Cube vs Countly
- Cube vs Freshpaint
- Cube vs Simple Analytics
- Cube vs Attribution
- Cube vs CallRail
- Cube vs Microsoft Clarity
- Cube vs Octoboard
- Cube vs Onclusive
- Cube vs WebEngage
- Cube vs Woopra
- Cube vs Wunderkind
- Cube vs Whatagraph
- Cube vs MoEngage
- Cube vs Optimizely
- Umami vs Evidence
- Umami vs Zenlytic
- Umami vs Sisense
- Umami vs GoodData
- Umami vs Logi Analytics
- Umami vs Dundas BI
- Umami vs Fabi
- Umami vs Yellowfin
- Umami vs ThoughtSpot
- Umami vs Jedox
- Umami vs Pigment
- Umami vs MicroStrategy
- Umami vs ProfitWell
- Umami vs Quantum Metric
- Umami vs Quid
- Umami vs Reportz
- Umami vs Rill Data
- Umami vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Umami vs Matomo
- Umami vs Plausible
- Umami vs Fathom Analytics
- Umami vs Mautic
- Umami vs Countly
- Umami vs Freshpaint
- Umami vs Simple Analytics
- Umami vs Attribution
- Umami vs CallRail
- Umami vs Microsoft Clarity
- Umami vs Octoboard
- Umami vs Onclusive
- Umami vs WebEngage
- Umami vs Woopra
- Umami vs Wunderkind
- Umami vs Whatagraph
- Umami vs MoEngage
- Umami vs Optimizely
