Maps · head to head
Correlator3D vs Webfleet

Correlator3D
Maps
SimActive photogrammetry with a published price list and a perpetual licence still on sale
- From
- $295/month
- Free plan
- No

Webfleet
Fleet Management
European fleet telematics, owned by Bridgestone since the TomTom Telematics sale
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Correlator3D the standard licence caps at 61 megapixel sensors, so an operator moving to a medium or large format camera has to buy a different and separately quoted licence rather than paying an upgrade fee.; Webfleet ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- They diverge on capability: Correlator3D covers Aerial triangulation, Webfleet covers Tachograph management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Correlator3D and Webfleet actually diverge.
| Attribute | Correlator3D | Webfleet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $295/month | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | quote |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Correlator3D
- Aerial triangulation
- DSM and DTM generation
- Orthomosaic production
- Point cloud and 3D mesh output
- Feature extraction
- GPU acceleration
- Satellite imagery support
- Batch and unattended processing
Only in Webfleet
- Tachograph management
- OptiDrive 360
- LINK devices
- PRO driver terminals
- Tyre and vehicle data
- Video telematics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Correlator3D
- An aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licencenot Webfleet
- A national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagerynot Webfleet
- A drone service provider producing bare-earth terrain models for volumetrics and corridor mapping at high throughputnot Webfleet
- An organisation that wants a perpetual licence because a multi-year subscription cannot be justified against its capital budgeting rulesnot Webfleet
Webfleet
- A haulage operator running heavy goods vehicles across EU borders that must download tachograph data remotely and prove driving-time compliancenot Correlator3D
- A European van fleet that wants driver coaching and fuel reporting without buying an American platform with unused compliance modulesnot Correlator3D
- An organisation already buying Bridgestone tyres and maintenance that can fold telematics into an existing service contractnot Correlator3D
- Fleets that want in-cab navigation and job dispatch on a dedicated driver terminal rather than a phone appnot Correlator3D
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Correlator3D
- The standard licence caps at 61 megapixel sensors, so an operator moving to a medium or large format camera has to buy a different and separately quoted licence rather than paying an upgrade fee.
- It is Windows desktop only with no cloud processing option, so throughput is bounded by the workstation and GPU you buy, and there is no way to burst capacity for one large job.
- There is no collaboration layer, client portal or field application, so deliverable sharing, review and version control all have to be handled by other software.
- The interface and workflow are built for photogrammetry specialists; an occasional drone operator will find the learning curve steeper than a consumer-oriented mapping package.
- The perpetual licence includes only one year of support and updates, and staying current afterwards means paying maintenance, so the headline $5,900 is not the whole long-term cost.
Webfleet
- Ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- North American coverage is thin next to the European operation, with a smaller partner network and an hours of service product that is not competitive with purpose-built ELD vendors.
- Useful compliance capability sits in add-on tiers, so remote tachograph download and advanced reporting push the real per vehicle cost well above the entry quote.
- The camera line arrived later than the market and offers less on-device detection and less coaching workflow than Lytx or Samsara, so safety-driven buyers often end up running a second system.
- Contracts are hardware-led and usually multi-year, so replacing Webfleet means either running out the term or writing off installed devices that have no resale value.
Pricing, plan by plan
Correlator3D
$295/month- Monthly subscription$295/month
- Unlimited images
- Sensors up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Yearly subscription$2950/year
- Unlimited images
- Sensors up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Permanent licence$5900/one-time
- Perpetual licence
- Unlimited images up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Permanent floating licence$6400/one-time
- Perpetual floating licence shared across machines
- Unlimited images up to 61 megapixels
- One year of support and updates included
Webfleet
On request- Webfleet$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription in feature tiers
- Hardware bought outright or amortised over the term
- Tachograph and remote download sold as add-ons
Which should you pick?
Choose Correlator3D if
- You need aerial triangulation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want dsm and dtm generation.
Choose Webfleet if
- You need tachograph management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want optidrive 360.
Questions people ask
- Is Correlator3D or Webfleet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Correlator3D starts at $295/month and Webfleet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Correlator3D or Webfleet?
- Correlator3D starts at $295/month and Webfleet at On request.
- Does Correlator3D or Webfleet run on more platforms?
- Correlator3D runs on Windows. Webfleet runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Correlator3D best used for?
- Correlator3D is most often used for an aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licence, a national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagery, a drone service provider producing bare-earth terrain models for volumetrics and corridor mapping at high throughput, an organisation that wants a perpetual licence because a multi-year subscription cannot be justified against its capital budgeting rules. Of those, an aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licence and a national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagery are not what Webfleet is typically brought in for.
- What can Correlator3D do that Webfleet cannot?
- Correlator3D covers Aerial triangulation, DSM and DTM generation, Orthomosaic production, Point cloud and 3D mesh output. Webfleet covers Tachograph management, OptiDrive 360, LINK devices, PRO driver terminals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Correlator3D: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Yes. $5,900 for a permanent licence and $6,400 for a permanent floating licence, each including a year of support and updates.
Webfleet: Is Webfleet still connected to TomTom?
No. TomTom sold the telematics business to Bridgestone in 2019. There is still navigation and mapping heritage in the driver terminals, but the owner and the strategy are Bridgestone.
Correlator3D: What limits the standard licence?
Sensor resolution, up to 61 megapixels. Medium format, large format and satellite imagery need separately priced licences.
Webfleet: Can it handle US ELD requirements?
There is an offering, but it is not the strength of the platform. A fleet whose main problem is US hours of service compliance should look at vendors built around that mandate.
Correlator3D: Is there a cloud version?
No. Processing runs on your own Windows workstation. SimActive offers a data processing service as an alternative to buying the software.
Webfleet: Do I have to buy Bridgestone tyres to use it?
No. The tyre services integration is optional. It is worth pricing as a bundle if you already buy from Bridgestone, because that is where the discounting sits.
Correlator3D: Does it handle satellite imagery?
Yes, under a separate satellite licence class quoted on request.
Related pages
More on Correlator3D
Other head to heads
- Correlator3D vs QGIS
- Correlator3D vs Agisoft Metashape
- Correlator3D vs Emlid Studio
- Correlator3D vs Cesium ion
- Correlator3D vs Global Mapper
- Correlator3D vs Atlas.co
- Correlator3D vs Leica Infinity
- Correlator3D vs Bing Maps
- Correlator3D vs Gaia GPS
- Correlator3D vs Fused
- Correlator3D vs CesiumJS
- Correlator3D vs Mappedin
- Correlator3D vs Navmii GPS
- Correlator3D vs Nominatim
- Correlator3D vs OpenLayers
- Correlator3D vs OpenRouteService
- Correlator3D vs OpenStreetMap
- Correlator3D vs OsmAnd
- Correlator3D vs Samsara
- Correlator3D vs Geotab
- Correlator3D vs Teletrac Navman
- Correlator3D vs Lytx
- Correlator3D vs Motive
- Correlator3D vs Fleet Complete
- Correlator3D vs Uptake
- Correlator3D vs AssetWorks
- Correlator3D vs Omnitracs
- Correlator3D vs Chevin FleetWave
- Correlator3D vs CalAmp
- Correlator3D vs Whip Around
- Correlator3D vs Ridecell
- Correlator3D vs Zonar Systems
- Correlator3D vs NexTraq
- Webfleet vs QGIS
- Webfleet vs Agisoft Metashape
- Webfleet vs Emlid Studio
- Webfleet vs Cesium ion
- Webfleet vs Global Mapper
- Webfleet vs Atlas.co
- Webfleet vs Leica Infinity
- Webfleet vs Bing Maps
- Webfleet vs Gaia GPS
- Webfleet vs Fused
- Webfleet vs CesiumJS
- Webfleet vs Mappedin
- Webfleet vs Navmii GPS
- Webfleet vs Nominatim
- Webfleet vs OpenLayers
- Webfleet vs OpenRouteService
- Webfleet vs OpenStreetMap
- Webfleet vs OsmAnd
- Webfleet vs Samsara
- Webfleet vs Geotab
- Webfleet vs Teletrac Navman
- Webfleet vs Lytx
- Webfleet vs Motive
- Webfleet vs Fleet Complete
- Webfleet vs Uptake
- Webfleet vs AssetWorks
- Webfleet vs Omnitracs
- Webfleet vs Chevin FleetWave
- Webfleet vs CalAmp
- Webfleet vs Whip Around
- Webfleet vs Ridecell
- Webfleet vs Zonar Systems
- Webfleet vs NexTraq
