Databases · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs NATS

NATS
Databases
High-performance messaging system for cloud-native applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); NATS core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, NATS covers Very low latency.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and NATS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | NATS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in NATS
- Very low latency
- JetStream
- Single binary
- Request-reply
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot NATS
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot NATS
NATS
- Service-to-service messaging where latency is the binding constraintnot Cockroach Labs
- Edge and IoT messaging where a lightweight broker mattersnot Cockroach Labs
- Replacing a heavier broker when the workload does not need its guaranteesnot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
NATS
- Core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- JetStream adds the durability but also the operational complexity NATS is chosen to avoid
- A much smaller ecosystem than Kafka or RabbitMQ, with fewer connectors and integrations
- Fewer people know it, so hiring and existing organisational knowledge favour the alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
NATS
Free- NATSFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose NATS if
- You need very low latency.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want jetstream.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or NATS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and NATS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or NATS?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and NATS at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or NATS run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. NATS runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what NATS is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that NATS cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. NATS covers Very low latency, JetStream, Single binary, Request-reply.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cockroach Labs: What does the free Basic tier include?
The Basic tier is free and includes 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month, with a maximum compute of 30K RU/sec. No credit card is required to start.
SourceNATS: Is NATS free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Synadia sells a managed service.
Cockroach Labs: How much do the paid tiers cost?
Standard tier starts at $0.18 per hour for 2 vCPUs, and Advanced tier starts at $0.60 per hour for 4 vCPUs. Both tiers support additional resources with higher costs for increased compute and storage.
SourceNATS: Does NATS persist messages?
Core NATS does not — it is fire-and-forget. JetStream adds persistence, streaming and replay when you need them.
Cockroach Labs: What are the storage limits for each tier?
Basic plan supports up to 3 TiB storage, Standard tier up to 3 TiB, and Advanced tier up to 10 TiB per node with unlimited total storage.
SourceNATS: NATS or Kafka?
NATS is far lighter and lower latency, and much simpler to run. Kafka is the answer when you need a durable replayable log and a large connector ecosystem.
Cockroach Labs: Can I get trial credits before paying?
Yes, new users can try CockroachDB free with $400 in credits. The Basic and Standard plans do not require a credit card to start.
SourceCockroach Labs: Do legacy contracts have different pricing?
Customers with annual or multi-year contracts entered before December 1, 2024 can view legacy pricing terms on a separate page, which apply until their contract renewal date.
SourceRelated pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs Google Cloud SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs TiDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Dgraph
- Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DataStax
- Cockroach Labs vs Neo4j
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Materialize
- Cockroach Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Turso
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Pulsar
- Cockroach Labs vs RabbitMQ
- Cockroach Labs vs VerneMQ
- Cockroach Labs vs EMQX
- Cockroach Labs vs Redpanda
- Cockroach Labs vs Timeplus
- Cockroach Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Cockroach Labs vs SurrealDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Teradata
- Cockroach Labs vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Cockroach Labs vs turbopuffer
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Kafka
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Flink
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- NATS vs YugabyteDB
- NATS vs PostgreSQL
- NATS vs Couchbase
- NATS vs Google Cloud SQL
- NATS vs Amazon Aurora
- NATS vs Elasticsearch
- NATS vs Oracle Database
- NATS vs TiDB
- NATS vs Dgraph
- NATS vs CosmosDB
- NATS vs DataStax
- NATS vs Neo4j
- NATS vs MariaDB
- NATS vs Materialize
- NATS vs TimescaleDB
- NATS vs Turso
- NATS vs Amazon RDS
- NATS vs Apache Pulsar
- NATS vs RabbitMQ
- NATS vs VerneMQ
- NATS vs EMQX
- NATS vs Redpanda
- NATS vs Timeplus
- NATS vs Solace PubSub+
- NATS vs SurrealDB
- NATS vs Teradata
- NATS vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- NATS vs turbopuffer
- NATS vs Apache Kafka
- NATS vs Apache Flink
- NATS vs Apache Druid

