Databases · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ
Databases
Open-source message broker supporting AMQP and other protocols
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); RabbitMQ not built for replay: once consumed, a message is gone, which is exactly what Kafka exists to change
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, RabbitMQ covers Flexible routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and RabbitMQ actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee; managed services billed separately |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in RabbitMQ
- Flexible routing
- Multiple protocols
- Management UI
- Clustering and mirroring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot RabbitMQ
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
- Distributing background jobs to a pool of workers with retriesnot Cockroach Labs
- Decoupling services that need delivery rather than a replayable historynot Cockroach Labs
- Routing messages by pattern to different consumers from one publishernot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
RabbitMQ
- Not built for replay: once consumed, a message is gone, which is exactly what Kafka exists to change
- Throughput ceilings are lower than a log-based platform under very heavy streaming loads
- Queues that build up degrade broker performance, so consumer lag is an operational problem rather than just a backlog
- Clustering and partition behaviour has historically been a source of hard-to-diagnose problems
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
RabbitMQ
Free- RabbitMQFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose RabbitMQ if
- You need flexible routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want multiple protocols.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or RabbitMQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and RabbitMQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or RabbitMQ?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and RabbitMQ at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or RabbitMQ run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. RabbitMQ runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what RabbitMQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that RabbitMQ cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. RabbitMQ covers Flexible routing, Multiple protocols, Management UI, Clustering and mirroring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cockroach Labs: What does the free Basic tier include?
The Basic tier is free and includes 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month, with a maximum compute of 30K RU/sec. No credit card is required to start.
SourceRabbitMQ: Is RabbitMQ free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee. Broadcom sells commercial support.
Cockroach Labs: How much do the paid tiers cost?
Standard tier starts at $0.18 per hour for 2 vCPUs, and Advanced tier starts at $0.60 per hour for 4 vCPUs. Both tiers support additional resources with higher costs for increased compute and storage.
SourceRabbitMQ: RabbitMQ or Kafka?
RabbitMQ is a message broker: simpler to run and better at flexible routing and work queues. Kafka is a replayable event log built for very high throughput streaming, and much heavier to operate.
Cockroach Labs: What are the storage limits for each tier?
Basic plan supports up to 3 TiB storage, Standard tier up to 3 TiB, and Advanced tier up to 10 TiB per node with unlimited total storage.
SourceRabbitMQ: Can RabbitMQ replay messages?
Not in the way Kafka can. Messages are removed once acknowledged, so rebuilding state from history is not the model.
Cockroach Labs: Can I get trial credits before paying?
Yes, new users can try CockroachDB free with $400 in credits. The Basic and Standard plans do not require a credit card to start.
SourceCockroach Labs: Do legacy contracts have different pricing?
Customers with annual or multi-year contracts entered before December 1, 2024 can view legacy pricing terms on a separate page, which apply until their contract renewal date.
SourceRelated pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs Google Cloud SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs TiDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Dgraph
- Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DataStax
- Cockroach Labs vs Neo4j
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Materialize
- Cockroach Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Turso
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Pulsar
- Cockroach Labs vs NATS
- Cockroach Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Cockroach Labs vs VerneMQ
- Cockroach Labs vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Cockroach Labs vs EMQX
- Cockroach Labs vs Aiven
- Cockroach Labs vs Redpanda
- Cockroach Labs vs OpenSearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Qdrant
- Cockroach Labs vs SingleStore
- Cockroach Labs vs Tinybird
- Cockroach Labs vs Typesense
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Kafka
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Flink
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Solr
- RabbitMQ vs YugabyteDB
- RabbitMQ vs PostgreSQL
- RabbitMQ vs Couchbase
- RabbitMQ vs Google Cloud SQL
- RabbitMQ vs Amazon Aurora
- RabbitMQ vs Elasticsearch
- RabbitMQ vs Oracle Database
- RabbitMQ vs TiDB
- RabbitMQ vs Dgraph
- RabbitMQ vs CosmosDB
- RabbitMQ vs DataStax
- RabbitMQ vs Neo4j
- RabbitMQ vs MariaDB
- RabbitMQ vs Materialize
- RabbitMQ vs TimescaleDB
- RabbitMQ vs Turso
- RabbitMQ vs Amazon RDS
- RabbitMQ vs Apache Pulsar
- RabbitMQ vs NATS
- RabbitMQ vs Solace PubSub+
- RabbitMQ vs VerneMQ
- RabbitMQ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- RabbitMQ vs EMQX
- RabbitMQ vs Aiven
- RabbitMQ vs Redpanda
- RabbitMQ vs OpenSearch
- RabbitMQ vs Qdrant
- RabbitMQ vs SingleStore
- RabbitMQ vs Tinybird
- RabbitMQ vs Typesense
- RabbitMQ vs Apache Kafka
- RabbitMQ vs Apache Flink
- RabbitMQ vs Apache Solr

