Databases · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs NATS

Amazon Aurora
Databases
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

NATS
Databases
High-performance messaging system for cloud-native applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; NATS core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, NATS covers Very low latency.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and NATS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | NATS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Founded | 2006 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in NATS
- Very low latency
- JetStream
- Single binary
- Request-reply
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot NATS
- Data storagenot NATS
- Application backendnot NATS
- Reportingnot NATS
- Data analyticsnot NATS
NATS
- Service-to-service messaging where latency is the binding constraintnot Amazon Aurora
- Edge and IoT messaging where a lightweight broker mattersnot Amazon Aurora
- Replacing a heavier broker when the workload does not need its guaranteesnot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
NATS
- Core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- JetStream adds the durability but also the operational complexity NATS is chosen to avoid
- A much smaller ecosystem than Kafka or RabbitMQ, with fewer connectors and integrations
- Fewer people know it, so hiring and existing organisational knowledge favour the alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
NATS
Free- NATSFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose NATS if
- You need very low latency.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want jetstream.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or NATS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and NATS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or NATS?
- Amazon Aurora starts at Free and NATS at Free.
- Does Amazon Aurora or NATS run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. NATS runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what NATS is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that NATS cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. NATS covers Very low latency, JetStream, Single binary, Request-reply.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceNATS: Is NATS free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Synadia sells a managed service.
Amazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceNATS: Does NATS persist messages?
Core NATS does not — it is fire-and-forget. JetStream adds persistence, streaming and replay when you need them.
Amazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceNATS: NATS or Kafka?
NATS is far lighter and lower latency, and much simpler to run. Kafka is the answer when you need a durable replayable log and a large connector ecosystem.
Amazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Aurora vs Airtable
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Kafka
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Meilisearch
- Amazon Aurora vs Turso
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs DuckDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Aurora vs DataGrip
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs Google Cloud SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs MotherDuck
- NATS vs Cockroach Labs
- NATS vs PostgreSQL
- NATS vs Airtable
- NATS vs Elasticsearch
- NATS vs Apache Kafka
- NATS vs PlanetScale
- NATS vs Meilisearch
- NATS vs Turso
- NATS vs Azure SQL
- NATS vs ClickHouse
- NATS vs Couchbase
- NATS vs DuckDB
- NATS vs MariaDB
- NATS vs Oracle Database
- NATS vs DataGrip
- NATS vs Firebolt
- NATS vs Google Cloud SQL
- NATS vs MotherDuck
