Databases · head to head
NATS vs SurrealDB

NATS
Databases
High-performance messaging system for cloud-native applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SurrealDB
Databases
Multi-model database combining documents, graphs, vectors and time-series
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: NATS core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening; SurrealDB the listed $0.192/node/hr Scale pricing lacks transparent higher-tier rates, requiring a sales conversation for full production sizing.
- They diverge on capability: NATS covers Very low latency, SurrealDB covers Multi-model engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NATS and SurrealDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NATS
- Very low latency
- JetStream
- Single binary
- Request-reply
Only in SurrealDB
- Multi-model engine
- ACID transactions
- Hybrid retrieval
- Horizontal scaling
- Multi-region disaster recovery
- FIPS-compliant cryptography
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NATS
- Service-to-service messaging where latency is the binding constraintnot SurrealDB
- Edge and IoT messaging where a lightweight broker mattersnot SurrealDB
- Replacing a heavier broker when the workload does not need its guaranteesnot SurrealDB
SurrealDB
- AI agent memory and retrieval-augmented generationnot NATS
- Applications needing documents, graphs and vectors in one databasenot NATS
- Knowledge graph construction from unstructured datanot NATS
- Regulated workloads requiring SOC2/ISO27001/HIPAA-eligible hostingnot NATS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NATS
- Core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- JetStream adds the durability but also the operational complexity NATS is chosen to avoid
- A much smaller ecosystem than Kafka or RabbitMQ, with fewer connectors and integrations
- Fewer people know it, so hiring and existing organisational knowledge favour the alternatives
SurrealDB
- The listed $0.192/node/hr Scale pricing lacks transparent higher-tier rates, requiring a sales conversation for full production sizing.
- As a newer multi-model database, it has a smaller ecosystem of drivers, ORMs and community tooling than established single-model databases.
- HIPAA compliance is only available as an Enterprise add-on rather than included in standard paid tiers.
- Combining multiple data models in one engine can add query-planning complexity compared to purpose-built single-model databases.
Pricing, plan by plan
NATS
Free- NATSFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
SurrealDB
Free- StartFree
- 1 free instance, then from $0.021/hr
- 1GB storage free forever
- Vertical scaling to terabytes
- Scale$0.192/month
- $0.192/node/hr
- Production-grade fault tolerance
- Horizontal scaling to petabytes
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Self-hosted, custom pricing
- Clustered fault-tolerant deployments
- FIPS-compliant cryptography
Which should you pick?
Choose NATS if
- You need very low latency.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want jetstream.
Choose SurrealDB if
- You need multi-model engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want acid transactions.
Questions people ask
- Is NATS or SurrealDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. NATS starts at Free and SurrealDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NATS or SurrealDB?
- NATS starts at Free and SurrealDB at Free.
- Does NATS or SurrealDB run on more platforms?
- NATS runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. SurrealDB runs on web, api, windows, mac, linux.
- Can I use NATS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is NATS best used for?
- NATS is most often used for service-to-service messaging where latency is the binding constraint, edge and iot messaging where a lightweight broker matters, replacing a heavier broker when the workload does not need its guarantees. Of those, service-to-service messaging where latency is the binding constraint and edge and iot messaging where a lightweight broker matters are not what SurrealDB is typically brought in for.
- What can NATS do that SurrealDB cannot?
- NATS covers Very low latency, JetStream, Single binary, Request-reply. SurrealDB covers Multi-model engine, ACID transactions, Hybrid retrieval, Horizontal scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NATS: Is NATS free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Synadia sells a managed service.
SurrealDB: What does SurrealDB cost?
SurrealDB Cloud's Start plan is free with one free instance (then from $0.021/hr), the Scale plan runs $0.192/node/hr for production workloads, and Enterprise self-hosted deployments use custom pricing.
SourceNATS: Does NATS persist messages?
Core NATS does not — it is fire-and-forget. JetStream adds persistence, streaming and replay when you need them.
SurrealDB: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Start plan includes one free instance with 1GB of storage free forever and 1GB of outbound data transfer per month, aimed at prototypes and development.
SourceNATS: NATS or Kafka?
NATS is far lighter and lower latency, and much simpler to run. Kafka is the answer when you need a durable replayable log and a large connector ecosystem.
SurrealDB: How is billing handled?
Customers are invoiced monthly based on actual usage in a pay-as-you-go model with no long-term commitments, though commitment-based discounts are available.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- NATS vs Apache Pulsar
- NATS vs RabbitMQ
- NATS vs VerneMQ
- NATS vs EMQX
- NATS vs Redpanda
- NATS vs Timeplus
- NATS vs Solace PubSub+
- NATS vs YugabyteDB
- NATS vs Cockroach Labs
- NATS vs Teradata
- NATS vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- NATS vs turbopuffer
- NATS vs Apache Kafka
- NATS vs Apache Flink
- NATS vs Apache Druid
- NATS vs Turso
- NATS vs MotherDuck
- NATS vs Vespa
- NATS vs Zilliz
- NATS vs ArangoDB
- NATS vs RavenDB
- NATS vs DuckDB
- NATS vs Oracle Database
- NATS vs TimescaleDB
- NATS vs Estuary
- NATS vs QuestDB
- NATS vs CosmosDB
- NATS vs DataGrip
- NATS vs Firebolt
- NATS vs Google Cloud SQL
- NATS vs Microsoft SQL Server
- SurrealDB vs Apache Pulsar
- SurrealDB vs RabbitMQ
- SurrealDB vs VerneMQ
- SurrealDB vs EMQX
- SurrealDB vs Redpanda
- SurrealDB vs Timeplus
- SurrealDB vs Solace PubSub+
- SurrealDB vs YugabyteDB
- SurrealDB vs Cockroach Labs
- SurrealDB vs Teradata
- SurrealDB vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- SurrealDB vs turbopuffer
- SurrealDB vs Apache Kafka
- SurrealDB vs Apache Flink
- SurrealDB vs Apache Druid
- SurrealDB vs Turso
- SurrealDB vs MotherDuck
- SurrealDB vs Vespa
- SurrealDB vs Zilliz
- SurrealDB vs ArangoDB
- SurrealDB vs RavenDB
- SurrealDB vs DuckDB
- SurrealDB vs Oracle Database
- SurrealDB vs TimescaleDB
- SurrealDB vs Estuary
- SurrealDB vs QuestDB
- SurrealDB vs CosmosDB
- SurrealDB vs DataGrip
- SurrealDB vs Firebolt
- SurrealDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- SurrealDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
