Databases · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Teradata

Teradata
Databases
Long-established enterprise MPP data warehouse, rebranded in 2026 as the Autonomous Knowledge Platform, sold for cloud, on-premises and hybrid.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cockroach Labs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); Teradata licensing is negotiated rather than published, so there is no way to compare total cost against a consumption-priced warehouse without entering a sales cycle, and the comparison is only ever as good as the workload profile you gave them.
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Teradata covers Massively parallel architecture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Teradata actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Teradata |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Web |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in Teradata
- Massively parallel architecture
- Workload management
- Mature cost-based optimiser
- Cloud, on-premises and hybrid
- Bulk load utilities
- BTEQ scripting
- In-database analytics
- Enterprise Vector Store
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Teradata
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Teradata
Teradata
- A large existing Teradata estate where the practical question is which workloads to migrate first rather than whether to adoptnot Cockroach Labs
- High-concurrency mixed workloads where hundreds of analysts and scheduled jobs contend and predictable prioritisation matters more than peak single-query speednot Cockroach Labs
- Regulated reporting where the same query must produce the same answer for years and the audit trail of the existing implementation has valuenot Cockroach Labs
- Hybrid deployments where regulatory or data-residency rules keep a portion of the warehouse on-premises while the rest moves to cloudnot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Teradata
- Licensing is negotiated rather than published, so there is no way to compare total cost against a consumption-priced warehouse without entering a sales cycle, and the comparison is only ever as good as the workload profile you gave them.
- The SQL dialect and the loading utilities are Teradata-specific, so every stored procedure, macro and BTEQ script written against the platform is migration debt that grows with each release you ship.
- Primary index choice determines data distribution, and a poorly chosen index concentrates rows on a few processing units, which surfaces as one slow query rather than an error and needs a specialist to diagnose.
- The skills market is contracting, so DBA and workload-management expertise is expensive to hire, hard to replace when someone retires, and increasingly hard to buy from consultancies whose own bench has moved to cloud warehouses.
- The 2026 renaming of Vantage, VantageCloud, ClearScape and QueryGrid split documentation, runbooks and vendor material across two naming systems, so searching for an error or a configuration now returns results for a product that is described under a different name.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Teradata
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Teradata review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Teradata if
- You need massively parallel architecture.
- You also want workload management.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Teradata better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Teradata at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Teradata?
- Cockroach Labs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cockroach Labs and On request for Teradata.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Teradata run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Teradata runs on Web.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Yes. Cockroach Labs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Teradata starts at On request.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Teradata is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Teradata cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. Teradata covers Massively parallel architecture, Workload management, Mature cost-based optimiser, Cloud, on-premises and hybrid.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cockroach Labs: What does the free Basic tier include?
The Basic tier is free and includes 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month, with a maximum compute of 30K RU/sec. No credit card is required to start.
SourceTeradata: Is Teradata only on-premises?
No. It is sold for cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment, and the cloud offering is now branded Teradata Cloud. A large part of the installed base is still on-premises or hybrid.
Cockroach Labs: How much do the paid tiers cost?
Standard tier starts at $0.18 per hour for 2 vCPUs, and Advanced tier starts at $0.60 per hour for 4 vCPUs. Both tiers support additional resources with higher costs for increased compute and storage.
SourceTeradata: How does it compare to Snowflake or BigQuery?
On raw elasticity and cost transparency the cloud warehouses win. On mixed-workload concurrency management against a large existing query estate Teradata is still hard to replace, which is why migrations off it take years rather than quarters.
Cockroach Labs: What are the storage limits for each tier?
Basic plan supports up to 3 TiB storage, Standard tier up to 3 TiB, and Advanced tier up to 10 TiB per node with unlimited total storage.
SourceTeradata: Why do organisations stay on it?
Because the cost of leaving is the estate, not the data. Thousands of procedures, scripts and extracts written in a proprietary dialect have to be rewritten and revalidated, and in regulated reporting that revalidation is the expensive part.
Cockroach Labs: Can I get trial credits before paying?
Yes, new users can try CockroachDB free with $400 in credits. The Basic and Standard plans do not require a credit card to start.
SourceTeradata: What changed in the 2026 rebrand?
Vantage became the Autonomous Knowledge Platform, VantageCloud became Teradata Cloud, ClearScape Analytics became AI Studio and QueryGrid became Fabric. The underlying products are continuous with what came before.
Cockroach Labs: Do legacy contracts have different pricing?
Customers with annual or multi-year contracts entered before December 1, 2024 can view legacy pricing terms on a separate page, which apply until their contract renewal date.
SourceTeradata: Can it handle AI and vector workloads?
It has added an Enterprise Vector Store and in-database analytics branded AI Studio. Whether that is preferable to moving the data into a purpose-built vector store depends on how much of your data already lives in the warehouse.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs Google Cloud SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs TiDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Dgraph
- Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DataStax
- Cockroach Labs vs Neo4j
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Materialize
- Cockroach Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Turso
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Solr
- Cockroach Labs vs Immuta
- Cockroach Labs vs BigQuery
- Cockroach Labs vs LanceDB
- Cockroach Labs vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Cockroach Labs vs Vitess
- Cockroach Labs vs Aiven
- Cockroach Labs vs dbt
- Teradata vs YugabyteDB
- Teradata vs PostgreSQL
- Teradata vs Couchbase
- Teradata vs Google Cloud SQL
- Teradata vs Amazon Aurora
- Teradata vs Elasticsearch
- Teradata vs Oracle Database
- Teradata vs TiDB
- Teradata vs Dgraph
- Teradata vs CosmosDB
- Teradata vs DataStax
- Teradata vs Neo4j
- Teradata vs MariaDB
- Teradata vs Materialize
- Teradata vs TimescaleDB
- Teradata vs Turso
- Teradata vs Amazon RDS
- Teradata vs Airtable
- Teradata vs Solace PubSub+
- Teradata vs Apache Solr
- Teradata vs Immuta
- Teradata vs BigQuery
- Teradata vs LanceDB
- Teradata vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Teradata vs Vitess
- Teradata vs Aiven
- Teradata vs dbt

