Databases · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs EMQX

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); EMQX the move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, EMQX covers Erlang clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and EMQX actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | EMQX |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Per month by connection and session volume |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot EMQX
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot EMQX
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot Cockroach Labs
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot Cockroach Labs
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot Cockroach Labs
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments.
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else.
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales.
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or EMQX better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and EMQX at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or EMQX?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and EMQX at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or EMQX run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. EMQX runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what EMQX is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that EMQX cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cockroach Labs: What does the free Basic tier include?
The Basic tier is free and includes 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month, with a maximum compute of 30K RU/sec. No credit card is required to start.
SourceEMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
Cockroach Labs: How much do the paid tiers cost?
Standard tier starts at $0.18 per hour for 2 vCPUs, and Advanced tier starts at $0.60 per hour for 4 vCPUs. Both tiers support additional resources with higher costs for increased compute and storage.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
Cockroach Labs: What are the storage limits for each tier?
Basic plan supports up to 3 TiB storage, Standard tier up to 3 TiB, and Advanced tier up to 10 TiB per node with unlimited total storage.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
Cockroach Labs: Can I get trial credits before paying?
Yes, new users can try CockroachDB free with $400 in credits. The Basic and Standard plans do not require a credit card to start.
SourceEMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
Cockroach Labs: Do legacy contracts have different pricing?
Customers with annual or multi-year contracts entered before December 1, 2024 can view legacy pricing terms on a separate page, which apply until their contract renewal date.
SourceRelated pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs Google Cloud SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs TiDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Dgraph
- Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DataStax
- Cockroach Labs vs Neo4j
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Materialize
- Cockroach Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Turso
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs VerneMQ
- Cockroach Labs vs RabbitMQ
- Cockroach Labs vs NATS
- Cockroach Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Cockroach Labs vs Canary Labs
- Cockroach Labs vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Cockroach Labs vs Chroma
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Teradata
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Kafka
- Cockroach Labs vs Immuta
- EMQX vs YugabyteDB
- EMQX vs PostgreSQL
- EMQX vs Couchbase
- EMQX vs Google Cloud SQL
- EMQX vs Amazon Aurora
- EMQX vs Elasticsearch
- EMQX vs Oracle Database
- EMQX vs TiDB
- EMQX vs Dgraph
- EMQX vs CosmosDB
- EMQX vs DataStax
- EMQX vs Neo4j
- EMQX vs MariaDB
- EMQX vs Materialize
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Amazon RDS
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs Teradata
- EMQX vs Apache Kafka
- EMQX vs Immuta

