Technology · head to head
Close vs Height

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -
Height
Technology
A project management tool from a small independent vendor that uses AI agents to handle routine ticket maintenance.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Height has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription); Height it is one product from one small venture-funded company with no second line of business underwriting it, so adopting it as your system of record is a bet on that company's funding, and the tool holds work history you would have to reconstruct elsewhere if the bet fails.
- They diverge on capability: Close covers Built-in calling, Height covers Autonomous triage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Close and Height actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Only in Height
- Autonomous triage
- Duplicate detection
- Attribute maintenance
- Per-task chat
- Multiple views
- Developer integrations
- Custom fields and filters
- Public API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Close
- Inside salesnot Height
- Outbound salesnot Height
- Lead managementnot Height
- Sales engagementnot Height
- Pipeline trackingnot Height
Height
- A product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has timenot Close
- Teams leaving Jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worthnot Close
- A support or intake queue where incoming requests need categorising and deduplicating before anyone can plan themnot Close
- Startups that want tasks, chat and progress tracking in one tool rather than stitching a tracker to a chat appnot Close
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Height
- It is one product from one small venture-funded company with no second line of business underwriting it, so adopting it as your system of record is a bet on that company's funding, and the tool holds work history you would have to reconstruct elsewhere if the bet fails.
- The 2024 relaunch as Height 2.0 reoriented the product around AI agents and changed workflows customers had already built on, which is the clearest available evidence of how much the product may be re-shaped again under you.
- The ecosystem is small next to Jira, Linear and Asana: fewer third-party integrations, no consultancy market, and far less written material to search when something behaves unexpectedly, so support questions go to the vendor and wait.
- The automation only pays off if tasks contain enough substance for a model to work with; on a team whose tickets are two-word titles, the agents have nothing to triage or deduplicate and the product reduces to an ordinary tracker at a premium.
- Task content is processed by hosted large language models, so a security review becomes a question about subprocessors and data handling, and there is no self-hosted or on-premises deployment to fall back on if the answer is unacceptable.
- There is no widely used two-way synchronisation with Jira, so an organisation where one team adopts Height and the rest stay on Jira ends up with two systems of record and manual reconciliation between them.
Pricing, plan by plan
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Height
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Height review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Choose Height if
- You need autonomous triage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want duplicate detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Close or Height better?
- Neither clearly leads. Close starts at $9/month and Height at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Close or Height?
- Height has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $9/month for Close and Free for Height.
- Does Close or Height run on more platforms?
- Close runs on Web, iOS, Android. Height runs on Web.
- Can I use Height for free?
- Yes. Height has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Close starts at $9/month.
- What is Close best used for?
- Close is most often used for inside sales, outbound sales, lead management, sales engagement. Of those, inside sales and outbound sales are not what Height is typically brought in for.
- What can Close do that Height cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management. Height covers Autonomous triage, Duplicate detection, Attribute maintenance, Per-task chat.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceHeight: How is this different from Jira automation?
Jira automation is rule-based: you define a trigger and an action. Height's agents read the content of tasks and act on judgement, such as recognising that two tickets describe the same bug, which no rule can express.
Close: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceHeight: Can we self-host it?
No. It is software as a service only, with no on-premises or private-cloud deployment. If your requirements rule out a hosted tracker, this is not a candidate.
Close: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceHeight: What happens to our data if the company fails?
You would need an export and a migration to another tool. This is the standard risk with a single-product startup, and it is worth confirming the export path covers task history, comments and custom fields before committing to it.
Close: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceHeight: Does it work for non-engineering teams?
Yes, the views and custom fields are generic enough for marketing, operations or support queues. Its integrations, though, are aimed at software teams, so a non-engineering team gets less of the surrounding value.
Close: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceHeight: Do the AI features need our tickets to be well written?
In practice, yes. Triage, deduplication and attribute maintenance work from what is written in the task, so the return is much higher on a team that already writes descriptive tickets than on one that does not.
Close: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Jenkins
- Close vs Miro
- Close vs Plane
- Close vs Postman
- Close vs Raycast
- Close vs Monday.com
- Close vs Shortcut
- Close vs Coda
- Close vs Intercom
- Close vs Kubernetes
- Close vs Figma
- Close vs Lovable
- Close vs Lucidchart
- Close vs MongoDB
- Close vs Nagios XI
- Close vs Postgres
- Close vs MongoDB Atlas
- Height vs Attio
- Height vs Drift
- Height vs Asana
- Height vs Docker
- Height vs Mozilla Firefox
- Height vs Userpilot
- Height vs Personetics
- Height vs Superhuman
- Height vs ClickUp
- Height vs Linear
- Height vs Notion
- Height vs Amplitude
- Height vs Jenkins
- Height vs Miro
- Height vs Plane
- Height vs Postman
- Height vs Raycast
- Height vs Monday.com
- Height vs Shortcut
- Height vs Coda
- Height vs Intercom
- Height vs Kubernetes
- Height vs Figma
- Height vs Lovable
- Height vs Lucidchart
- Height vs MongoDB
- Height vs Nagios XI
- Height vs Postgres
- Height vs MongoDB Atlas
