Maps · head to head
Citymapper vs QGIS
QGIS
Maps
Free, open-source desktop GIS application that supports viewing, editing, and analysis of
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Citymapper has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Citymapper citymapper's own App Store listing states live transit and turn-by-turn features work only in a named list of specific cities (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and dozens of other listed cities), not globally, per the developer's own description.; QGIS requires technical knowledge to use effectively for advanced GIS analysis
- They diverge on capability: Citymapper covers Multi-modal routing, QGIS covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Citymapper and QGIS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Citymapper | QGIS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Ios, Android, Web | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: pricing model (freemium), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Citymapper
- Multi-modal routing
- Real-time departures
- Live bus tracking
- Disruption alerts
- Walking directions
- Uber
- Lyft
- Lime
Only in QGIS
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Citymapper
- Daily commutingnot QGIS
- City explorationnot QGIS
- Trip planningnot QGIS
- Mobility as a servicenot QGIS
QGIS
- Creating thematic maps showing population density by regionnot Citymapper
- Digitizing building footprints from satellite imagery for urban planningnot Citymapper
- Analyzing proximity of retail stores to competitor locationsnot Citymapper
- Performing spatial analysis of wildlife habitat suitabilitynot Citymapper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Citymapper
- Citymapper's own App Store listing states live transit and turn-by-turn features work only in a named list of specific cities (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and dozens of other listed cities), not globally, per the developer's own description.
QGIS
- Requires technical knowledge to use effectively for advanced GIS analysis
- Desktop application does not include built-in web publishing capabilities
Pricing, plan by plan
Citymapper
Free- FreeFree
- Multi-modal routing
- Real-time departures
- Basic navigation
- Citymapper Premium$4.99/month
- Live location sharing
- Weather integration
- Widgets
QGIS
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the QGIS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Citymapper if
- You need multi-modal routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Ios, Android, Web.
- You also want real-time departures.
Choose QGIS if
- You need core functionality.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Citymapper or QGIS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Citymapper starts at Free and QGIS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Citymapper or QGIS?
- Citymapper has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Citymapper and On request for QGIS.
- Does Citymapper or QGIS run on more platforms?
- Citymapper runs on Ios, Android, Web. QGIS runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Citymapper for free?
- Yes. Citymapper has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. QGIS starts at On request.
- What is Citymapper best used for?
- Citymapper is most often used for daily commuting, city exploration, trip planning, mobility as a service. Of those, daily commuting and city exploration are not what QGIS is typically brought in for.
- What can Citymapper do that QGIS cannot?
- Citymapper covers Multi-modal routing, Real-time departures, Live bus tracking, Disruption alerts. QGIS covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Citymapper: Does Citymapper offer paid membership?
Yes, Citymapper offers a CLUB membership tier with exclusive features, including AI-powered route selection. However, specific pricing details for CLUB membership are not disclosed on their main website.
SourceQGIS: Is QGIS free and open source?
Yes. QGIS is free and open-source software, licensed under the GNU General Public License, available for download and modification by anyone.
SourceCitymapper: Where can I find Citymapper CLUB pricing?
Citymapper CLUB pricing is not published on their website. You would need to check the mobile app (Apple App Store or Google Play Store) or contact Citymapper support directly for current pricing information.
SourceQGIS: What operating systems does QGIS support?
QGIS runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with installers available for each platform.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Citymapper vs Transit
- Citymapper vs Google Maps Platform
- Citymapper vs HERE Technologies
- Citymapper vs Apple Maps
- Citymapper vs Mapbox
- Citymapper vs Ride with GPS
- Citymapper vs Trailforks
- Citymapper vs AllTrails
- Citymapper vs onX Maps
- Citymapper vs Felt
- Citymapper vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Citymapper vs TomTom
- Citymapper vs Waze
- Citymapper vs What3words
- Citymapper vs Google Maps
- Citymapper vs HERE WeGo
- Citymapper vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Citymapper vs GRASS GIS
- Citymapper vs WhiteboxTools
- Citymapper vs Global Mapper
- Citymapper vs SAGA GIS
- Citymapper vs CesiumJS
- Citymapper vs Agisoft Metashape
- Citymapper vs Atlas.co
- Citymapper vs Emlid Studio
- Citymapper vs Leaflet
- Citymapper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Citymapper vs Potree
- Citymapper vs Foursquare Places API
- Citymapper vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Citymapper vs Fused
- Citymapper vs Geoapify
- Citymapper vs Leica Infinity
- QGIS vs Transit
- QGIS vs Google Maps Platform
- QGIS vs HERE Technologies
- QGIS vs Apple Maps
- QGIS vs Mapbox
- QGIS vs Ride with GPS
- QGIS vs Trailforks
- QGIS vs AllTrails
- QGIS vs onX Maps
- QGIS vs Felt
- QGIS vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- QGIS vs TomTom
- QGIS vs Waze
- QGIS vs What3words
- QGIS vs Google Maps
- QGIS vs HERE WeGo
- QGIS vs TomTom Developer Portal
- QGIS vs GRASS GIS
- QGIS vs WhiteboxTools
- QGIS vs Global Mapper
- QGIS vs SAGA GIS
- QGIS vs CesiumJS
- QGIS vs Agisoft Metashape
- QGIS vs Atlas.co
- QGIS vs Emlid Studio
- QGIS vs Leaflet
- QGIS vs ArcGIS Survey123
- QGIS vs Potree
- QGIS vs Foursquare Places API
- QGIS vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- QGIS vs Fused
- QGIS vs Geoapify
- QGIS vs Leica Infinity

