Softwr

Mobile Development · head to head

Adjust vs Capacitor

Adjust logo

Adjust

Mobile Development

Mobile measurement and fraud prevention, owned by the ad network AppLovin since 2021

From
On request
Rated
-
Capacitor logo

Capacitor

Mobile Development

MIT-licensed native runtime bridging web apps to iOS, Android and native APIs

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Capacitor has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Adjust the vendor is owned by AppLovin, an advertising network and game publisher, so the party measuring campaign performance has a corporate interest in some of the inventory being measured.; Capacitor uI still renders in a system WebView, so complex animation and heavy graphics work require more manual tuning than a natively-rendered framework provides by default.
  • They diverge on capability: Adjust covers Install and event attribution, Capacitor covers Native project generation.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Adjust and Capacitor actually diverge.

Attributes where Adjust and Capacitor differ
AttributeAdjustCapacitor
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelPer attributed installOpen source, no licence fee
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsiOS, Android, WebWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mobile Development).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Adjust

  • Install and event attribution
  • Fraud prevention
  • Audience builder
  • Automate
  • Datascape reporting
  • Data residency options

Only in Capacitor

  • Native project generation
  • Plugin bridge
  • Custom native plugins
  • Live Reload
  • Framework agnostic
  • Capacitor Assets and Configure CLIs

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Adjust

  • An advertiser wanting fraud rejection applied before invoices are approved rather than clawed back afterwardsnot Capacitor
  • European organisations that need attribution data held in the European Unionnot Capacitor
  • Mid sized user acquisition teams that found the largest measurement partner's commitment level unaffordablenot Capacitor
  • Games publishers running spend across many networks who need one reconciled performance viewnot Capacitor

Capacitor

  • A team wrapping an existing responsive web app to publish it to the App Store and Play Storenot Adjust
  • A product using React or Vue that wants native device APIs without adopting a full mobile frameworknot Adjust
  • A developer who wants to drop into native Swift or Kotlin code for the parts a plugin does not covernot Adjust
  • A company migrating off Apache Cordova, since Capacitor was designed as a modern, actively maintained successornot Adjust

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Adjust

  • The vendor is owned by AppLovin, an advertising network and game publisher, so the party measuring campaign performance has a corporate interest in some of the inventory being measured.
  • Pricing is per attributed install on an annual commitment, meaning a successful campaign raises the measurement bill proportionally and overage above the commitment is charged at a worse rate.
  • App Tracking Transparency removed deterministic iOS attribution for users who decline tracking, so a significant portion of iOS reporting is modelled and the interface does not always separate modelled from observed.
  • Fraud prevention, audiences and the analytics layer are priced as separate modules, so a comparison against a competitor quote is only valid if module scope is matched line by line.
  • Attribution history stays with the vendor, so switching partners breaks year on year comparisons and the cost of leaving rises with every year of data accumulated.

Capacitor

  • UI still renders in a system WebView, so complex animation and heavy graphics work require more manual tuning than a natively-rendered framework provides by default.
  • Every native capability not covered by an official or community plugin means writing and maintaining native Swift and Kotlin code, which erodes the single-codebase promise for device-heavy apps.
  • It is maintained by the same team as Ionic, and while it does not require the Ionic UI library, its release cadence and roadmap priorities are set by a company now owned by OutSystems.
  • Cordova plugins are not automatically compatible and often need adaptation, so migrating a legacy Cordova app is a real porting project, not a drop-in swap.
  • App store review teams scrutinise WebView-wrapped apps more closely for "just a website" rejections, so thin wrapper apps carry more approval risk than natively-compiled alternatives.

Pricing, plan by plan

Adjust

On request
  • Adjust$undefined/year
    • Annual commitment priced on attributed install volume, with fraud prevention and audiences as add on modules
    • Terms are negotiated and not published; mid market discounting is generally more available than at the largest competitor

Capacitor

Free
  • CapacitorFree
    • MIT licensed, unlimited apps
    • Core plugin set included
    • Community support via GitHub and Discord

Which should you pick?

Choose Adjust if

  • You need install and event attribution.
  • You work on iOS, Android, Web.
  • You also want fraud prevention.

Choose Capacitor if

  • You need native project generation.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want plugin bridge.

Questions people ask

Is Adjust or Capacitor better?
Neither clearly leads. Adjust starts at On request and Capacitor at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Adjust or Capacitor?
Capacitor has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Adjust and Free for Capacitor.
Does Adjust or Capacitor run on more platforms?
Adjust runs on iOS, Android, Web. Capacitor runs on Web, iOS, Android.
Can I use Capacitor for free?
Yes. Capacitor has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Adjust starts at On request.
What is Adjust best used for?
Adjust is most often used for an advertiser wanting fraud rejection applied before invoices are approved rather than clawed back afterwards, european organisations that need attribution data held in the european union, mid sized user acquisition teams that found the largest measurement partner's commitment level unaffordable, games publishers running spend across many networks who need one reconciled performance view. Of those, an advertiser wanting fraud rejection applied before invoices are approved rather than clawed back afterwards and european organisations that need attribution data held in the european union are not what Capacitor is typically brought in for.
What can Adjust do that Capacitor cannot?
Adjust covers Install and event attribution, Fraud prevention, Audience builder, Automate. Capacitor covers Native project generation, Plugin bridge, Custom native plugins, Live Reload.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Adjust: Does AppLovin ownership compromise measurement?

There is no public evidence of manipulation, but the structural conflict exists. Some advertisers exclude Adjust for that reason alone and it is a legitimate position.

Capacitor: Do I need Ionic components to use Capacitor?

No. Capacitor is the native runtime and plugin bridge; the Ionic UI component library is a separate, optional layer.

Adjust: How does it compare with AppsFlyer on price?

Generally more flexible for mid sized advertisers. Compare module scope, not headline rates, because attribution alone is rarely what you need.

Capacitor: Is Capacitor free for commercial apps?

Yes, it is MIT licensed with no fee for commercial use, and there is no paid tier of Capacitor itself.

Adjust: Can data be kept in the EU?

Yes, European hosting is offered, which is a common reason for choosing it over United States based competitors.

Capacitor: Is it a replacement for Cordova?

Functionally yes for most teams, though existing Cordova plugins need adaptation rather than working unmodified.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads