Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Vite

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Vite does not support Node.js built-in polyfills, requiring manual configuration for CommonJS libraries
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Vite actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Vite |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Node.js, Deno, Bun |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Vite
Nothing recorded that Blacksmith does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Vite
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Vite
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Vite
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Vite
Vite
- Developers speeding up hot module replacement during React developmentnot Blacksmith
- Vue.js teams reducing rebuild times in large monorepo codebasesnot Blacksmith
- Teams building with TypeScript without additional tooling configurationnot Blacksmith
- Open-source contributors testing code changes in sub-second feedbacknot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Vite
- Does not support Node.js built-in polyfills, requiring manual configuration for CommonJS libraries
- File watching fails on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 in certain conditions
- Smaller ecosystem and community compared to webpack
- Ampersands in Windows project paths cause module resolution failures
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Vite
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Vite review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Vite better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Vite at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Vite?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Vite at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Vite run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Vite runs on Node.js, Deno, Bun.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Vite is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Vite cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceVite: Does Vite support CommonJS dependencies?
Vite automatically converts CommonJS dependencies to ES modules during pre-bundling using esbuild, but it does not support Node.js built-in polyfills. For projects requiring Node builtins, additional configuration may be needed.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceVite: Can Vite work offline?
Vite requires internet for initial dependency pre-bundling with esbuild. Once dependencies are pre-bundled and cached, development can continue with local file serving, but full offline development is not supported.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceVite: What are Vite's system requirements on Windows?
Vite can run on Windows, but WSL2 users may experience file watching issues where Vite cannot detect file changes in certain conditions. Windows users with project paths containing ampersands may encounter module resolution failures with npm.
SourceVite: Does Vite support TypeScript, JSX, and CSS out of the box?
Yes. Vite natively supports TypeScript, JSX, CSS, and WebAssembly without additional configuration needed for basic use.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs ESLint
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Copilot
- Blacksmith vs Penpot
- Blacksmith vs Keycloak
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs CLion
- Blacksmith vs GNAT Pro
- Blacksmith vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Blacksmith vs GNU Emacs
- Blacksmith vs Keil MDK
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs CodeSandbox
- Blacksmith vs Eclipse IDE
- Blacksmith vs Moonrepo
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Vite vs Visual Studio Code
- Vite vs ESLint
- Vite vs pnpm
- Vite vs Turborepo
- Vite vs GitHub Copilot
- Vite vs Penpot
- Vite vs Keycloak
- Vite vs Rust
- Vite vs CLion
- Vite vs GNAT Pro
- Vite vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Vite vs GNU Emacs
- Vite vs Keil MDK
- Vite vs Bazel
- Vite vs CodeSandbox
- Vite vs Eclipse IDE
- Vite vs Moonrepo
- Vite vs Nx Cloud

