Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Spacelift

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Spacelift users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Spacelift actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Spacelift |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | By private worker and tier, not by user |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web, Self-hosted, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Spacelift
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Spacelift
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Spacelift
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Spacelift
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot Blacksmith
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot Blacksmith
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot Blacksmith
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between.
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround.
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter Plus$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- Business$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want policy as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Spacelift better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Spacelift at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Spacelift?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Spacelift at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Spacelift run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Spacelift is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Spacelift cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceSpacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
Spacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Spacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs Atlantis
- Blacksmith vs Harness
- Blacksmith vs Cortex
- Blacksmith vs Backstage
- Blacksmith vs Okteto
- Blacksmith vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Blacksmith vs HCP Terraform
- Blacksmith vs Azure DevOps
- Blacksmith vs Frappe
- Blacksmith vs Deno
- Blacksmith vs Fig
- Blacksmith vs Git
- Blacksmith vs GoLand
- Spacelift vs WarpBuild
- Spacelift vs Depot
- Spacelift vs Namespace
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Nx Cloud
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs Garden
- Spacelift vs ConfigCat
- Spacelift vs Dagger
- Spacelift vs Nix
- Spacelift vs Rust
- Spacelift vs Ansible
- Spacelift vs Refact
- Spacelift vs Restate
- Spacelift vs RubyMine
- Spacelift vs Soketi
- Spacelift vs SonarQube
- Spacelift vs Sourcegraph
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Azure DevOps
- Spacelift vs Frappe
- Spacelift vs Deno
- Spacelift vs Fig
- Spacelift vs Git
- Spacelift vs GoLand
