Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Keycloak

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Keycloak actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Blacksmith does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Keycloak
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Keycloak
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Keycloak
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Blacksmith
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Blacksmith
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Blacksmith
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Blacksmith
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Keycloak?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Keycloak cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs ESLint
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Copilot
- Blacksmith vs Penpot
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs CLion
- Blacksmith vs GNAT Pro
- Blacksmith vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Blacksmith vs GNU Emacs
- Blacksmith vs Keil MDK
- Blacksmith vs Vite
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs CodeSandbox
- Blacksmith vs Eclipse IDE
- Blacksmith vs Moonrepo
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs GitHub Copilot
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Rust
- Keycloak vs CLion
- Keycloak vs GNAT Pro
- Keycloak vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Keycloak vs GNU Emacs
- Keycloak vs Keil MDK
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Bazel
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse IDE
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Nx Cloud
