Softwr

Developer Tools · head to head

Blacksmith vs Turborepo

Blacksmith logo

Blacksmith

Developer Tools

2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Turborepo logo

Turborepo

Developer Tools

High-performance build system for JavaScript and TypeScript monorepos

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Turborepo no commercial support mentioned

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Turborepo actually diverge.

Attributes where Blacksmith and Turborepo differ
AttributeBlacksmithTurborepo
Pricing modelUnknownopen-source
PlatformsGitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOSJavaScript/TypeScript, npm, yarn, pnpm
FoundedUnknown2015

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Blacksmith

  • Bare metal runners
  • Multiple OS support
  • ARM support
  • Docker layer caching
  • Sticky disks
  • GitHub Actions observability
  • Free tier
  • Static IPs

Only in Turborepo

Nothing recorded that Blacksmith does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Blacksmith

  • Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Turborepo
  • Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Turborepo
  • Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Turborepo
  • Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Turborepo

Turborepo

  • Monorepo build orchestrationnot Blacksmith
  • JavaScript/TypeScript build optimizationnot Blacksmith
  • Incremental buildsnot Blacksmith
  • Task caching and remote executionnot Blacksmith

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Blacksmith

  • Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
  • macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
  • Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
  • Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo

Turborepo

  • No commercial support mentioned
  • Build tool with community-driven development

Pricing, plan by plan

Blacksmith

Free
  • Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
    • 3,000 free minutes per month
    • 2x faster hardware
    • 4x faster cache downloads
  • Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
    • 3,000 free minutes per month
    • 2x faster hardware
    • 4x faster cache downloads
  • Windows x64$0.008/minute
    • 3,000 free minutes per month
    • 2x faster hardware
    • 4x faster cache downloads
  • macOS M4$0.08/minute
    • 3,000 free minutes per month
    • 2x faster hardware
    • 4x faster cache downloads

Turborepo

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Turborepo review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Blacksmith if

  • You need bare metal runners.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
  • You also want multiple os support.
Blacksmith review

Choose Turborepo if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on JavaScript/TypeScript, npm, yarn, pnpm.
Turborepo review

Questions people ask

Is Blacksmith or Turborepo better?
Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Turborepo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Turborepo?
Blacksmith starts at Free and Turborepo at Free.
Does Blacksmith or Turborepo run on more platforms?
Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Turborepo runs on JavaScript/TypeScript, npm, yarn, pnpm.
Can I use Blacksmith for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Blacksmith best used for?
Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Turborepo is typically brought in for.
What can Blacksmith do that Turborepo cannot?
Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?

Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.

Source
Turborepo: Is Turborepo free?

Yes. Turborepo is open-source and free to use. The project is maintained and documented on turborepo.dev (redirected from turbo.build).

Source
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?

Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.

Source
Turborepo: Does Turborepo offer commercial support or enterprise tiers?

No pricing tiers or commercial support details are provided on the Turborepo documentation site. The project appears to be community-supported.

Source
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?

Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Blacksmith

More on Turborepo

Keep looking

Other head to heads