Developer Tools · head to head
Atlantis vs Blacksmith

Atlantis
Developer Tools
Runs Terraform plan and apply from pull request comments, self-hosted and free
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Atlantis there is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.; Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- They diverge on capability: Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlantis and Blacksmith actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlantis | Blacksmith |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlantis
- Pull request plans
- Comment driven apply
- Workspace locking
- Policy checking
- Multi-platform webhooks
- Custom workflows
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlantis
- Making Terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approvernot Blacksmith
- Removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keysnot Blacksmith
- Getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platformnot Blacksmith
- Enforcing Conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can runnot Blacksmith
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Atlantis
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Atlantis
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Atlantis
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Atlantis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlantis
- There is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.
- The security surface is inherently sharp, because it is an internet-reachable webhook endpoint that executes applies with privileged credentials, gated by pull request comment authorisation that is coarse next to a real policy engine.
- It is stateful, holding a working directory and lock database on local disk, so high availability and horizontal scaling are awkward and you own upgrades, webhook plumbing, secret rotation and the host itself.
- It lacks the features that distinguish the commercial alternatives, with no native drift detection, no cost estimation, no managed state interface and no policy engine beyond the Conftest integration.
- Terragrunt and monorepo layouts are not first-class, requiring hand-written custom workflows and repository configuration that becomes a growing maintenance burden as the number of repositories increases.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlantis
Free- AtlantisFree
- Apache-2.0, no usage limits and no seat count
- No commercial edition and no paid support tier
- Community support through GitHub and the CNCF Slack channel
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlantis if
- You need pull request plans.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want comment driven apply.
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlantis or Blacksmith better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlantis starts at Free and Blacksmith at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlantis or Blacksmith?
- Atlantis starts at Free and Blacksmith at Free.
- Does Atlantis or Blacksmith run on more platforms?
- Atlantis runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use Atlantis for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Atlantis best used for?
- Atlantis is most often used for making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver, removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys, getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platform, enforcing conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can run. Of those, making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver and removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys are not what Blacksmith is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlantis do that Blacksmith cannot?
- Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Comment driven apply, Workspace locking, Policy checking. Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlantis: Is there a company behind Atlantis?
No. It runs as a series of LF Projects under the Linux Foundation and is maintained by volunteers. There is no vendor to buy support from and no service level agreement.
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceAtlantis: Is it a CNCF project?
No. It uses a channel in the CNCF Slack, which is often misread as membership, but the project sits under LF Projects rather than the CNCF.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceAtlantis: Does it work with OpenTofu?
Yes, there is a dedicated integration guide alongside Terraform, and it also has configuration for working with hosted Terraform backends.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceAtlantis: What does it not do that a paid platform does?
Drift detection, cost estimation, a managed state and run interface, and a real policy engine. Atlantis does pull request plan and apply well and stops there.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Atlantis vs Spacelift
- Atlantis vs HCP Terraform
- Atlantis vs Harness
- Atlantis vs Jitsu
- Atlantis vs Visual Studio Code
- Atlantis vs Tilt
- Atlantis vs Soketi
- Atlantis vs Pants Build
- Atlantis vs Steampipe
- Atlantis vs Refact
- Atlantis vs Penpot
- Atlantis vs GNU Emacs
- Atlantis vs Okteto
- Atlantis vs OpsLevel
- Atlantis vs PartyKit
- Atlantis vs PhpStorm
- Atlantis vs Pieces for Developers
- Atlantis vs RAD Studio
- Atlantis vs WarpBuild
- Atlantis vs Depot
- Atlantis vs Namespace
- Atlantis vs Earthly
- Atlantis vs Nx Cloud
- Atlantis vs Garden
- Atlantis vs ConfigCat
- Atlantis vs Dagger
- Atlantis vs Nix
- Atlantis vs Rust
- Atlantis vs Ansible
- Atlantis vs Restate
- Atlantis vs RubyMine
- Atlantis vs SonarQube
- Atlantis vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs Spacelift
- Blacksmith vs HCP Terraform
- Blacksmith vs Harness
- Blacksmith vs Jitsu
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs Tilt
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs Pants Build
- Blacksmith vs Steampipe
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Penpot
- Blacksmith vs GNU Emacs
- Blacksmith vs Okteto
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
