Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs pnpm

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; pnpm requires command-line proficiency to use
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and pnpm actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | pnpm |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, Windows, macOS |
| Founded | Unknown | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in pnpm
Nothing recorded that Blacksmith does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot pnpm
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot pnpm
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot pnpm
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot pnpm
pnpm
- Installing dependencies faster than npm in monorepo workspacesnot Blacksmith
- Sharing common dependencies across multiple projects to save disk spacenot Blacksmith
- Preventing dependency version conflicts in workspace environmentsnot Blacksmith
- Managing workspaces with many interdependent packagesnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
pnpm
- Requires command-line proficiency to use
- Community-driven support only
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
pnpm
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the pnpm review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or pnpm better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and pnpm at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or pnpm?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and pnpm at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or pnpm run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. pnpm runs on Linux, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what pnpm is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that pnpm cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
Sourcepnpm: Is pnpm free and open source?
Yes. pnpm is free and open source software developed for Node.js. Version 10 and 11 are currently available.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
Sourcepnpm: How does pnpm save disk space?
pnpm uses a content-addressable store with hard linking and symlinks to avoid duplication. All files are saved in a single place on disk and hard-linked to individual projects, dramatically reducing storage requirements compared to npm.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
Sourcepnpm: Is pnpm faster than npm?
Yes. pnpm performs installation in three stages: dependency resolution, directory structure calculation, and linking. Packages are fetched and linked as soon as possible, making it significantly faster than npm's sequential approach.
Sourcepnpm: Does pnpm support monorepos?
Yes. pnpm has built-in support for monorepositories. You can create a workspace using pnpm-workspace.yaml to unite multiple projects in a single repository.
Sourcepnpm: How does pnpm handle node_modules differently than npm?
pnpm uses symlinks to add only direct dependencies to node_modules root, preventing accidental access to undeclared dependencies. This encourages more explicit dependency management compared to npm's flattened node_modules structure.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Yarn
- Blacksmith vs Helm
- Blacksmith vs Buildkite
- Blacksmith vs Azure DevOps
- Blacksmith vs Deno
- Blacksmith vs JFrog Artifactory
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs Harness
- Blacksmith vs Argo CD
- Blacksmith vs GitLab CI/CD
- Blacksmith vs HCP Terraform
- Blacksmith vs Swagger UI
- Blacksmith vs Helix
- Blacksmith vs JetBrains Rider
- pnpm vs WarpBuild
- pnpm vs Depot
- pnpm vs Namespace
- pnpm vs Earthly
- pnpm vs Nx Cloud
- pnpm vs OpsLevel
- pnpm vs Garden
- pnpm vs ConfigCat
- pnpm vs Dagger
- pnpm vs Nix
- pnpm vs Rust
- pnpm vs Ansible
- pnpm vs PhpStorm
- pnpm vs Pieces for Developers
- pnpm vs RAD Studio
- pnpm vs Refact
- pnpm vs Restate
- pnpm vs RubyMine
- pnpm vs Yarn
- pnpm vs Helm
- pnpm vs Buildkite
- pnpm vs Azure DevOps
- pnpm vs Deno
- pnpm vs JFrog Artifactory
- pnpm vs Turborepo
- pnpm vs Harness
- pnpm vs Argo CD
- pnpm vs GitLab CI/CD
- pnpm vs HCP Terraform
- pnpm vs Swagger UI
- pnpm vs Helix
- pnpm vs JetBrains Rider

